Lightning

Whippled Lightning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #106  
WaveBlaster785's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by l-menace
Rob,
I'm not going to get into a pissing match with you, but if the MP was putting out over 20# ... aww nevermind.

That puts my conservative street tune 435/522 on my stock block to shame.
you beat me, 15 more hp and 66 more ft/lbs.

Please explain how The pressure in the combustion chamber is going to be different? will it be cooler? will it allow you to run more timing? will the tune be different?

I'm not trying to be a smartass. I'm trying to figure out how the engine will know that it has a $3300 blower and now has to make more power ... at the same pressure that the 1/2 price magnum was making.

Is the Whipple that much more efficient and it doesn't that much parasitic power to spin it? thus freeing up horsepower, instead of actually creating more?

I'm pretty sure he was saying that cylinder pressure rises with boost, and with the Eaton and with the KB, or Whipple he would be able to make more power on LESS boost, and therefore lower cylinder pressures.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:17 AM
  #107  
whip's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: MA
Originally Posted by LightningTuner
Yep JJ, pretty good amount too.
Hahahaha!
Thats a good one!
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #108  
Tim Skelton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Originally Posted by l-menace
. . . I'm trying to figure out how the engine will know that it has a $3300 blower and now has to make more power ... at the same pressure that the 1/2 price magnum was making.

Is the Whipple that much more efficient and it doesn't that much parasitic power to spin it? thus freeing up horsepower, instead of actually creating more?
It's not about boost or pressure, it's about density.

The Whipple will supply cooler air with less parasitic drag. On the KB at stock pressures, that amounts to 16 rwHP. The Whipple should be similar.

At 20 PSIG, the gap would be huge.
 

Last edited by Tim Skelton; Jul 11, 2005 at 12:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #109  
31Charlie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by Grimace
2 weeks.
Lol, never gets olds.

So let me get this straight. Whipple is saying I can put their blower on my completely stock '00 block and get up to 15psi of boost with out worrying about blowing the engine and gain 175 hp with out a tune. Wow.

31C
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #110  
honda hunter's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Bahrain
Originally Posted by 31Charlie
Lol, never gets olds.

So let me get this straight. Whipple is saying I can put their blower on my completely stock '00 block and get up to 15psi of boost with out worrying about blowing the engine and gain 175 hp with out a tune. Wow.

31C
September now according to another thread I read
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #111  
l-menace's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
It's not about boost or pressure, it's about density.

The Whipple will supply cooler air with less parasitic drag. On the KB at stock pressures, that amounts to 16 rwHP. The Whipple should be similar.

At 20 PSIG, the gap would be huge.
isn't pressure directly related to density, or vice versa?
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #112  
brain bypass's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
Originally Posted by l-menace
isn't pressure directly related to density, or vice versa?
pressure, temperature, and density are all related.

say you have two cannisters of air both at 100 psi. one is 100*F the other is 200*F, the one with a lower temp will have a proportionally higher density.
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #113  
Magnum Powers's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by brain bypass
pressure, temperature, and density are all related.

say you have two cannisters of air both at 100 psi. one is 100*F the other is 200*F, the one with a lower temp will have a proportionally higher density.
That is correct! And Sal has told me he data logged both the KB's and Mag's air charge temperature running the same boost pressure and the Mag's air charge temperature was lower by quite a bit. In other tests Sal has run a PE aginst the Mag with the Mag making 5 pounds more boost yet the Mag had the same air charge temperature as the PE with the PE running 5 pounds less boost.

Charles
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #114  
Master Of Pain's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Webster, TX
Originally Posted by Magnum Powers
That is correct! And Sal has told me he data logged both the KB's and Mag's air charge temperature running the same boost pressure and the Mag's air charge temperature was lower by quite a bit. In other tests Sal has run a PE aginst the Mag with the Mag making 5 pounds more boost yet the Mag had the same air charge temperature as the PE with the PE running 5 pounds less boost.

Charles
Exactly. The more heat energy matter has, the more the excited and energetic the molecules (or atoms) are, and they will have a larger distance between them, hence lower density per volume. This rate of thermal expansion (or contraction) is fairly linear with most matter, with few exceptions (such as water-ice).
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #115  
Magnum Powers's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Master Of Pain
Exactly. The more heat energy matter has, the more the excited and energetic the molecules (or atoms) are, and they will have a larger distance between them, hence lower density per volume. This rate of thermal expansion (or contraction) is fairly linear with most matter, with few exceptions (such as water-ice).
Master, I sent you an email but I figure your mail server threw it in the trash.
How about give me a call or send me an email, I'd like to discuss something with you.

Cheers,
Charles
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #116  
Master Of Pain's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Webster, TX
Originally Posted by Magnum Powers
Master, I sent you an email but I figure your mail server threw it in the trash.
How about give me a call or send me an email, I'd like to discuss something with you.

Cheers,
Charles
ojref@yahoo.com is good, or ojref@oplink.net

I'll try to ring you later on today.
 

Last edited by Master Of Pain; Jul 11, 2005 at 05:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #117  
KBELL's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Rob_02Lightning
If there is a clear answer to what makes them run trouble free, I surely am interested in knowing it. SO, can Jim Bell "or someone" PLEASE clear this up for me, ("in laymen talk").
Are we saying only a stock air box will retain the wrrnty on a KB ???

or maybe a Airaid System too, (since it seals against the hood when closed)
Response:
Rob,
I think everyone must decide for themselves if they want their engine - supercharged or non, Kenne Bell or other, stock or modified - to suck in “cool” or “hot” air. But who can deny that ANY engine will run better, make more power and be more reliable with cooler air? I think the combination of a SEALED BOX, FENDERWELL FEED AND FRONT AUXILIARY HOSE is the best setup for a Lightning owner looking for both max cool air and air flow. The JLP kit comes closest to meeting these requirements so we recommend it and warranty kits with the JLP or the stock air box. Our customers should be aware that Kenne Bell hasn’t yet declined to warranty anyone’s supercharger because of a “hot air” kit. We have no way of knowing what kind of system our customers run, but the temperature can be determined. We ARE making an honest attempt to convince Lightning owners that COOL AIR is better than HOT AIR for any supercharger including ours. The Airaid System looks good for cool air flow but appears to lack the auxiliary air hose of the JLP kit and therefore could not supply enough air to feed your high HP Lightnings.

Jim Bell
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 01:49 PM
  #118  
KBELL's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by WaveBlaster785
Jim, you stated that you know exactly how many blowers have locked up or failed, I for one would like to know this number. PLEASE POST THIS NUMBER SO WE CAN SEE HOW FEW HAVE FAILED.
1. Of all the Lightning superchargers sold since introduction in 12/’03, our records show 44 failures from rotor to case contact. All were warrantied. The total number sold is confidential. There have been only 4 warranties in the last 6-1/2 months. All were the “old style.” The threads you see about KB’s “locking up” are not the new redesigned case. The good news is no reported failures with the new design, so it appears we’ve solved the problem. So, I think I’ll disagree when you say we STILL have a problem.

Originally Posted by WaveBlaster785
So far if I'm on track I have a blower that cannot be spun past X RPM, isn't designed for trucks that use extremely mild cams, and cannot be used with 90% of aftermarket air induction kits. Is this correct so far?
2. Contrary to what you may have heard, we recognized the issues with the case and did, in fact, re-design it - twice. Yes, we should have got it 100% the first time, but we didn’t. For one, we screwed up and didn’t foresee the effect of the “hot air” kits. I agree, Kenne Bell may not make 90% of the inlet “hot air” kit suppliers happy, but making them love us was never one of my priorities. Instead, I must do and recommend - as any manufacturer does - what I believe to be in the best interest of Kenne Bell products and customers. To a few, it may sound like we’re making excuses, but to us, it’s both a recommendation and a warning. And I don’t care what other supercharger manufacturers recommend or don’t recommend for inlet kits. All supercharger companies list a maximum recommended rpm. Kenne Bell is not unique here - or hiding anything. To the best of my knowledge, I don’t recall us ever stating you can’t use a cam with our superchargers. We don’t care what cam - mild or hot - the customer uses. Just don’t over rev the supercharger.

You raise some other good but technically complex issues on Kenne Bell vs. Eaton cases, discharge temp, etc. that are beyond the scope of this text and probably not all that interesting to everyone. However, if you would like to discuss them further, feel free to give me a call.

Jim Bell
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #119  
WaveBlaster785's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by KBELL
Response:
Rob,
I think everyone must decide for themselves if they want their engine - supercharged or non, Kenne Bell or other, stock or modified - to suck in “cool” or “hot” air. But who can deny that ANY engine will run better, make more power and be more reliable with cooler air? I think the combination of a SEALED BOX, FENDERWELL FEED AND FRONT AUXILIARY HOSE is the best setup for a Lightning owner looking for both max cool air and air flow. The JLP kit comes closest to meeting these requirements so we recommend it and warranty kits with the JLP or the stock air box. Our customers should be aware that Kenne Bell hasn’t yet declined to warranty anyone’s supercharger because of a “hot air” kit. We have no way of knowing what kind of system our customers run, but the temperature can be determined. We ARE making an honest attempt to convince Lightning owners that COOL AIR is better than HOT AIR for any supercharger including ours. The Airaid System looks good for cool air flow but appears to lack the auxiliary air hose of the JLP kit and therefore could not supply enough air to feed your high HP Lightnings.

Jim Bell
The PSP kit runs two hoses, one through the fenderwell and one to the bottom of the box.

Just an FYI, I wasn't sure if you had done the research to know that someone other than JLP sells a coldair kit. Seeing as some of us are not willing to pay 185 dollars for a box and filter, 100 for a scoop, and another 20 for a lid.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #120  
Sharpshooter's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
How about the PSP Fast Air kit. When moving my IAT is at ambient temperature. It has 2 "AUXILIARY HOSE's" At idle the temp does climb, but I would imagine JLP's does the same thing.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 AM.