Lightning

BOP reflashed PCM is in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 08:36 PM
  #106  
jmimac351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Originally posted by Grey03
ROTFLMAO @ ****.

It works as advertised? All I see are false claims that cant be backed up with any tech info. Yes, the dyno session looks good, and the results seem promising, but are you gonna post any graphs or just type in the info??

How does it achieve its A/F ratio goal again by using only the MAF and IAT? Nobody has even attempted to explain that one.

There is no way in hell that the new reflash knew there was a vacumm leak, unless it uses the 02's to sense A/F. So with that said, try jetting the NOS nozzle up to 150 and jet the fuel nozzle down to 75 and lets see that amazing computer reflash compensate for that difference. I bet you it cant, but that is what you guys have been saying all along, that it can compensate and reach its A/F goal no matter what.

I'll repeat it again, if there was a vacumm leak, the computer richend up and your 12.5 is more like a 13.5 or leaner in reality with the vacumm leak fixed.

Debate it all you want boys, but lets prove it at the track, alot of dyno queens here lately, starting to look like the Supra boards..


CONSTANT YIELD

Hellllllloooooooo!!!! There is no fuel nozzle!!! It runs off the computer! Can you guys not read? You want to believe things are a certain way so much that it affects your comprehension skills.

Yesterday you guys were complaining about no dyno results. Now those are not good enough and the only thing that means anything is a trip to the track. OK.

Believe it, don't believe it. Who cares? It's your loss. Others reading this thread will make up their own mind.

Grey03, ego is not everything. Best to have a little class.

Jim
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #107  
cyntaxx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 1
From: here
Originally posted by Grey03
Debate it all you want boys, but lets prove it at the track, alot of dyno queens here lately, starting to look like the Supra boards..

Weren't you one of the people who demanded dyno numbers for this?

PLASMA BOOSTER
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #108  
03Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Grey03

I would like to see you take your tuner chip and add 4lb of bost, then run it, add an additional 55 hp shot of NO2 and run it, then put on a 75 shot of NO2 and run it, then put on a 100 shot of NO2 and run it ON THE SAME PROGRAM!
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 08:50 PM
  #109  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
His so called tuning abiltiies already blow up trucks as it is with standard 4# lowers. 4th of july is over, no need to have explosions from adding juice to his programs. lol

Hell, go ask JDM. They are working on one of JJ's tuned trucks as we speak.


You Got 0wned
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 08:53 PM
  #110  
NateTrun2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Conway, AR
sorry guys, had email probs. This time they should have sent.
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #111  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Thanks nat


Got 3 copies from ya
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:19 PM
  #112  
red00Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Arlington,Tx
Originally posted by cpeapea
dude nate, we should dyno your 4lber then swap my 6 on there to see where the a/f goes. this would be a true test of the consistent a/f ratio goal.
I would like to see that....of course you will have to give the computer a chance to learn it for a few miles.

--wes
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #113  
hslightnin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach
Originally posted by 03Lightning
hslightnin

I mean that there was no change in programing between runs.
The only changes that were made form run to run was shooting NO2 and then trying 3 different sized jets, each time increasing the shot of NO2. Nothing was done to the computer in any of the runs, no fliping chips, no reflashing progams, absolutely nothing!
o i c, sorry bout that

on another note it looks like the A/f went up 1% with the nitrous
is that still within limits?
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:43 PM
  #114  
Grey03's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: All over the US
Originally posted by Flying ****
His so called tuning abiltiies already blow up trucks as it is with standard 4# lowers. 4th of july is over, no need to have explosions from adding juice to his programs. lol

Hell, go ask JDM. They are working on one of JJ's tuned trucks as we speak.


You Got 0wned


when you are ready to debate anything associated with the above statements without resorting to your usual MO of name calling and bash talking without facts, and if you are willing to do this debate on the above issues in a mature and responsible way, I will be here waiting for that day, but until then, your MO gets you owned everytime you post ****, and everyone knows it exept you. Start a thread anytime you want ****, I'm waiting.

READY AND WILLING
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:43 PM
  #115  
NateTrun2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Conway, AR
Originally posted by red00Lightning
I would like to see that....of course you will have to give the computer a chance to learn it for a few miles.

--wes

it doesn't learn it in a few miles. It learns it in a few seconds
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:44 PM
  #116  
NateTrun2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Conway, AR
Originally posted by hslightnin
o i c, sorry bout that

on another note it looks like the A/f went up 1% with the nitrous
is that still within limits?
yes. Thats normal with nitrous. I don't like the baselines because they are screwed up like I said about the n.o.s fuel regulator vac line.
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #117  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Originally posted by Grey03


when you are ready to debate anything associated with the above statements without resorting to your usual MO of name calling and bash talking without facts, and if you are willing to do this debate on the above issues in a mature and responsible way, I will be here waiting for that day, but until then, your MO gets you owned everytime you post ****, and everyone knows it exept you. Start a thread anytime you want ****, I'm waiting.

READY AND WILLING

Yawn JJ

PLASMA BOOSTER
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #118  
captainoblivious's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by NateTrun2
sorry guys, had email probs. This time they should have sent.
Still no go

captainoblivious@hotmail.com
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 10:10 PM
  #119  
NateTrun2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Conway, AR
Originally posted by captainoblivious
Still no go

captainoblivious@hotmail.com
on the way
 
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 10:52 PM
  #120  
03Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
hslightnin

It looks like we are still not on the same page. The AFR went up bacause you are comparing it to a none NO2 run that was unusually ritch. The tuners at Speed Works felt that it was because interfearance from the NO2 fuel pressure modification. What AFR do 4lb chiped trucks show in the same conditons? Also no one has addressed why when the NO2 jets were changed the AFR stayed within .50 and as close as .00 (even) as the increasingly higher shots were used. This couldn't be adaptive strategy could it?
 

Last edited by 03Lightning; Jul 9, 2003 at 11:01 PM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.