There has not been a Christianity thread in a while...
Shines and I have found and are a part of something bigger than us. We have a higher power to look for guidance for. We have someone who can always be talked to and will always listen. We are easily forgiven for our sins. No matter what we go through in life, we have someone who will help us through. We have God, as opposed to you "Free Minded" people. You have no higher power. No superior to look upon. No one to seek guidance or forgiveness. You are lost minds that need to power of God to help you see the light.
I understand your POV now.
You ever watch SouthPark Stealth?
You know how Cartman says "I'm gonna kick you in the nuts!"
So one day my wife was half drunk, and she said it to me while trying to mock Cartman, but she accidentally said "Shnuts"
It just sounded funny at the time.
You know how Cartman says "I'm gonna kick you in the nuts!"
So one day my wife was half drunk, and she said it to me while trying to mock Cartman, but she accidentally said "Shnuts"
It just sounded funny at the time.
When you say, take it verbatim, you also have to consider the context. When you talk of cruelty etc, are you referring to New Testament or Old Testament? This was supposed to be a discussion of Chritianity, which is New Testament. There is no cruelty that I can remember other than Christians being persecuted in the New Testament.
In the New Testament Jesus makes constant references to "scripture". In Matthew 22:29 Jesus says: "You are in error, because you do not know the scriptures, or the power of God." Now, just what were these scriptures that Jesus was making reference to? The New Testament? At the time there was no such thing as a New Testament. Every reference to "scripture" in the New Testament establishes one more link to the Old Testament. How many times does the New Testament refer to Old Testament "scriptures"? 52 times.
In the New Testament, Abraham is referred to 68 times, the ancient Israelites are mentioned 73 times, Jacob 26 times, Issac 20 times, Elijah 29 times, Isiah 22 times, Noah 8 times, King David is mentioned 58 times, and the name Moses appears 80 times. You think these numbers don't establish an important connection? You don't think that Jesus held that the teachings of Moses were important? Jesus gives an absolute endorsement of the teachings and laws of Moses. "If you believe Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?" John 5:45
You can't sit there and tell me that the New Testament is not inexorably linked in the deepest ways to the Old Testament.
In John 1:1, we read "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." In verse 14, we read: "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us." We are told explicitly that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament. Most Christians, in particular the Catholics, already accept this. But, by logical extension, you must also accept therefore that it was Jesus Christ who ordered the Israelites to slaughter millions of defenseless men, women and children in the conquest of Canaan; it was Jesus Christ who killed every firstborn child in Egypt; it was Jesus Christ who ordered king Saul to butcher thousands of children and babies in the genocide of the Amalakites; it was Jesus Christ who ordered the Israelites to capture and mass-rape 32,000 young girls of the Midianite tribe after killing their families; it was Jesus Christ who struck dead 50,000 innocent people at Beshemish for merely looking into the ark of the covenant; it was Jesus Christ who caused the painful asphyxiation of every man, woman, child and animal on the face of the earth during the flood of Noah (with the exception of 8 people and 2 of each animal species); and it was Jesus Christ who condemned every person ever born to a state of eternal suffering, all because 6000 years ago a curious and naive woman ate a piece of fruit. And, of course, it was Jesus Christ who sent 2 bears to chase down 42 little kids and disembowel them for just acting like kids. 2 Kings, 2:23-24
when did it ever say that God created Adam and Eve at the same time?? Last i checked he created man (adam) then the created the rest of the world Then created Eve. He created her to give Adam a mate and because Adam was lonely. So please tell me where it says they were created at the same time!!
Then God said, "Let us make humans in our image, in our likeness. Let them rule the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, the domestic animals all over the earth, and all the animals that crawl on the earth." So God created humans in his image. In the image of God he created them. He created them male and female.
You have just proven my point. Genesis 1:1 through 2:3 says God made the rest of the world, and then made man and woman together, last. Genesis 2:4-25 tells a completely different story, the one you are referring to.
Perhaps your God created your morals, but you can't possibly say he/she/it created the morals for everyone else.
Shines and I have found and are a part of something bigger than us. We have a higher power to look for guidance for. We have someone who can always be talked to and will always listen. We are easily forgiven for our sins. No matter what we go through in life, we have someone who will help us through. We have God, as opposed to you "Free Minded" people. You have no higher power. No superior to look upon. No one to seek guidance or forgiveness. You are lost minds that need to power of God to help you see the light.
For me personally, religion was one area of my life where I really struggled as I got older. Growing up, I never felt pressured to follow the Bible verbatim, and really saw it as more of a guide. When I started learning more about Catholicism, where things went from gray to black and white, it all started to fall apart. A true Catholic, and some would argue a true Christian, believes that God is infallible, which means that if he believes one part of the bible, he must believe the whole thing, not just select bits and pieces. But the Bible is so full of contradictions and inaccuracies, it almost single handedly invalidated Christianity for me.
The way that God in the Old Testament is the diametrical opposite of the God in the New Testament just didn't wash if he was infallible. Deuteronomy 21:18-21 says that we should stone to death disobedient children, and Exodus 21:7 says it's okay to sell your daughter into slavery. But Jesus tells us to 'do violence to no man', to 'turn the other cheek', and to 'love our enemies.' Then I found out that in the Bible, God takes the lives of 2,270,365 people. Satan is only responsible for 10 deaths; those of Job's seven sons and three daughters. And he's the bad guy? I finally came to the conclusion that the Bible advocates prejudice, superstition, cruelty, and murder, and I have no interest in believing in something like that. The God I grew up believing in would be appalled by much of what is written on those pages.
It was then that I accepted myself as being agnostic. I believed in God enough to ask for his help in the past, and I dont believe in hypocrisy or being a fairweather friend, so I still believed in God, I just felt that none of the organized religions that I was aware of knew any better than I did what he wanted, or expected of me.
That's where I was a few years ago, maybe 10. Then things like science and logic crept into the picture. If left to my own devices, I would often find myself questioning the logic of believing in God. At first, all it took to snap me out of it was hearing some other yahoo going on about how he knew there was no God, and I'd be in his face arguing in a heartbeat, and would eventually walk away feeling like someone was looking down on me approvingly.
As time went on, though, and I became more honest with myself, I found the idea of an actual God, as I understood him, more and more difficult to accept. I always thought of atheists as sad, depressing pessimists, and felt sorry for them, which is probably why I struggled for so long before openly admitting that I had become one. I hung on to the term 'agnostic' for a long time because it was like an atheist, but not as depressing. lol. Or at least that's how I perceived them.
But I'm not sad and depressed. And even if I was, being an atheist would have had nothing to do with it. As strange as this may sound to you, I actually felt better, and happier, after "coming out of the atheist closet." It's not for any of the reasons I thought it would be, either. I don't suddenly feel like I can now get away with things I shouldn't do, or like it's no longer wrong to do immoral things. I don't do bad things because I know they're wrong, not because I fear being punished by God. I am the source of my morals, not someone or something else, and I guess it took becoming an atheist for me to fully realize that. All those years I gave God the credit, and I was doing it myself, dammit! lol.
I mistook my conscience as being God giving me advice. When I made a decision that worked well for me, it was my own intelligence that subconsciously guided me, and not some greater being that I was following blindly.
But that's just me.
The Bible, like many other religious books, is a GREAT book of morals. Thats it, and when it is taken a step farther (literal translation, for example) then it becomes the work of evil. I truly believe RELIGION is the root of ALL evil. It is the reason the world it the way it is, it is the reason for mass genocide and horrible executions. Every major tragedy that has befallen man, has come so in the name of, or for the sake of a religion. Every war, every mass genocide, all the conflicts going on in both the middle east, and much more so in Africa, are a direct relation to a religion. An "idea" is one thing, a "belief" is a whole nother .
The Bible has been used in the past, and is continued today to be used as a form of control, over the mass of people. People are generally operating on a low form of humanity. They only do good, out of hopes of reward, or fear of punishment. That is not to say all people do, simply the majority (even if that be 50.0000001% ). Look at how the Bible has changed over the years. It has gone from gloom and doom, fire and brimstone, to accepteance and understanding. Christians nit and pick the Bible and say these parts of the Old Testament don't count, but these other parts of the Old Testament do count. Which ever is more convenient at the time. In the beginning suicide was not a sin, and during the early times, many Roman Catholics began killing both themselves and their children in hopes of a better life in Heaven. The pope quickly changed it, so that suicide was a direct ticket to hell. How can you take a religion seriously, when so many human interventions happen. Man wrote the bible, and man can and will lie for his own advantages. The bible was written HUNDREDS of years AFTER Jesus Christ, not one person who wrote it was alive during his time, nor knew someone who was alive. How accurate can it be ? Accurate enough to base my entire life and all the ways I think around it ? No. During the time it was written, stuff that today seems simple and easy to explain through science and other discoveries was strictly a mystery to them, only explained through the phenomena of "God".
Want to know my personal beliefs? I like to use what Einstein said as an example. Much better said then anything I could come up with:
"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God."
(The following is from Einstein and Religion by Max Jammer, Princeton University Press)
"I'm not an atheist, and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws. Our limited minds grasp the mysterious force that moves the constellations."
He said it best, IMO. He is truly a fascinating man, someone I think everyone should look into a little more closely.
The Bible has been used in the past, and is continued today to be used as a form of control, over the mass of people. People are generally operating on a low form of humanity. They only do good, out of hopes of reward, or fear of punishment. That is not to say all people do, simply the majority (even if that be 50.0000001% ). Look at how the Bible has changed over the years. It has gone from gloom and doom, fire and brimstone, to accepteance and understanding. Christians nit and pick the Bible and say these parts of the Old Testament don't count, but these other parts of the Old Testament do count. Which ever is more convenient at the time. In the beginning suicide was not a sin, and during the early times, many Roman Catholics began killing both themselves and their children in hopes of a better life in Heaven. The pope quickly changed it, so that suicide was a direct ticket to hell. How can you take a religion seriously, when so many human interventions happen. Man wrote the bible, and man can and will lie for his own advantages. The bible was written HUNDREDS of years AFTER Jesus Christ, not one person who wrote it was alive during his time, nor knew someone who was alive. How accurate can it be ? Accurate enough to base my entire life and all the ways I think around it ? No. During the time it was written, stuff that today seems simple and easy to explain through science and other discoveries was strictly a mystery to them, only explained through the phenomena of "God".
Want to know my personal beliefs? I like to use what Einstein said as an example. Much better said then anything I could come up with:
"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God."
(The following is from Einstein and Religion by Max Jammer, Princeton University Press)
"I'm not an atheist, and I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws. Our limited minds grasp the mysterious force that moves the constellations."
He said it best, IMO. He is truly a fascinating man, someone I think everyone should look into a little more closely.
to make it easier to anyone believing my interpridation of the book,speak now:
Anyone disagree with me ??

You sound to me like a spiritual person, rather than a religious person (like many others in this thread).
Last edited by PKRWUD; Aug 20, 2008 at 06:31 AM.
Actually, let me add one more point; Both of my parents are ordained ministers, and I was raised in a loving, Protestant Christian home. I have seen some wonderful things done that were attributed to religion, so I wouldn't say that it is entirely evil, but it is an extremely powerful weapon for those that are evil.
That is true, and is one more reason why Intelligent Design should be taught in church, not in a science class.
I'm really not sure how you can say such a thing. I can understand why you would want to; the Old Testament is a bloody massacre with very little moral rectitude, especially when compared to the New Testament, but you just can't do that. The two are very deeply intertwined, trying to ignore the Old Testament invalidates the New Testament.
In the New Testament Jesus makes constant references to "scripture". In Matthew 22:29 Jesus says: "You are in error, because you do not know the scriptures, or the power of God." Now, just what were these scriptures that Jesus was making reference to? The New Testament? At the time there was no such thing as a New Testament. Every reference to "scripture" in the New Testament establishes one more link to the Old Testament. How many times does the New Testament refer to Old Testament "scriptures"? 52 times.
In the New Testament, Abraham is referred to 68 times, the ancient Israelites are mentioned 73 times, Jacob 26 times, Issac 20 times, Elijah 29 times, Isiah 22 times, Noah 8 times, King David is mentioned 58 times, and the name Moses appears 80 times. You think these numbers don't establish an important connection? You don't think that Jesus held that the teachings of Moses were important? Jesus gives an absolute endorsement of the teachings and laws of Moses. "If you believe Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?" John 5:45
You can't sit there and tell me that the New Testament is not inexorably linked in the deepest ways to the Old Testament.
In John 1:1, we read "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." In verse 14, we read: "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us." We are told explicitly that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament. Most Christians, in particular the Catholics, already accept this. But, by logical extension, you must also accept therefore that it was Jesus Christ who ordered the Israelites to slaughter millions of defenseless men, women and children in the conquest of Canaan; it was Jesus Christ who killed every firstborn child in Egypt; it was Jesus Christ who ordered king Saul to butcher thousands of children and babies in the genocide of the Amalakites; it was Jesus Christ who ordered the Israelites to capture and mass-rape 32,000 young girls of the Midianite tribe after killing their families; it was Jesus Christ who struck dead 50,000 innocent people at Beshemish for merely looking into the ark of the covenant; it was Jesus Christ who caused the painful asphyxiation of every man, woman, child and animal on the face of the earth during the flood of Noah (with the exception of 8 people and 2 of each animal species); and it was Jesus Christ who condemned every person ever born to a state of eternal suffering, all because 6000 years ago a curious and naive woman ate a piece of fruit. And, of course, it was Jesus Christ who sent 2 bears to chase down 42 little kids and disembowel them for just acting like kids. 2 Kings, 2:23-24
I'm really not sure how you can say such a thing. I can understand why you would want to; the Old Testament is a bloody massacre with very little moral rectitude, especially when compared to the New Testament, but you just can't do that. The two are very deeply intertwined, trying to ignore the Old Testament invalidates the New Testament.
In the New Testament Jesus makes constant references to "scripture". In Matthew 22:29 Jesus says: "You are in error, because you do not know the scriptures, or the power of God." Now, just what were these scriptures that Jesus was making reference to? The New Testament? At the time there was no such thing as a New Testament. Every reference to "scripture" in the New Testament establishes one more link to the Old Testament. How many times does the New Testament refer to Old Testament "scriptures"? 52 times.
In the New Testament, Abraham is referred to 68 times, the ancient Israelites are mentioned 73 times, Jacob 26 times, Issac 20 times, Elijah 29 times, Isiah 22 times, Noah 8 times, King David is mentioned 58 times, and the name Moses appears 80 times. You think these numbers don't establish an important connection? You don't think that Jesus held that the teachings of Moses were important? Jesus gives an absolute endorsement of the teachings and laws of Moses. "If you believe Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?" John 5:45
You can't sit there and tell me that the New Testament is not inexorably linked in the deepest ways to the Old Testament.
In John 1:1, we read "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." In verse 14, we read: "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us." We are told explicitly that Jesus Christ is the God of the Old Testament. Most Christians, in particular the Catholics, already accept this. But, by logical extension, you must also accept therefore that it was Jesus Christ who ordered the Israelites to slaughter millions of defenseless men, women and children in the conquest of Canaan; it was Jesus Christ who killed every firstborn child in Egypt; it was Jesus Christ who ordered king Saul to butcher thousands of children and babies in the genocide of the Amalakites; it was Jesus Christ who ordered the Israelites to capture and mass-rape 32,000 young girls of the Midianite tribe after killing their families; it was Jesus Christ who struck dead 50,000 innocent people at Beshemish for merely looking into the ark of the covenant; it was Jesus Christ who caused the painful asphyxiation of every man, woman, child and animal on the face of the earth during the flood of Noah (with the exception of 8 people and 2 of each animal species); and it was Jesus Christ who condemned every person ever born to a state of eternal suffering, all because 6000 years ago a curious and naive woman ate a piece of fruit. And, of course, it was Jesus Christ who sent 2 bears to chase down 42 little kids and disembowel them for just acting like kids. 2 Kings, 2:23-24
__________________
Jim
Jim



Thanks for the laugh!
[QUOTE=PKRWUD;3341344]Actually, let me add one more point; Both of my parents are ordained ministers, and I was raised in a loving, Protestant Christian home. I have seen some wonderful things done that were attributed to religion, so I wouldn't say that it is entirely evil, but it is an extremely powerful weapon for those that are evil.[/QUOTE]
Now to that I can totally agree! Religeon or a faith in God is not the problem. The problem is man's perversion of these things for his on benefit and greed. That has been going on since the beginning of man.
Now to that I can totally agree! Religeon or a faith in God is not the problem. The problem is man's perversion of these things for his on benefit and greed. That has been going on since the beginning of man.
__________________
Jim
Jim
Ok, where is the man who started this thread?
There has been some pretty fascinating "answers" put out there and as we can see, just about everybody has their own interpretation of the Bible to suit their needs.
Not only have contradictions been pointed out in the Bible, people have then denied those and then contradicted themselves and each other.
How is a good, honest Agnostic like me supposed to make sense of this?
Now that Pandora's Box has been opened, Shines, what's your take on some of the later replies?
There has been some pretty fascinating "answers" put out there and as we can see, just about everybody has their own interpretation of the Bible to suit their needs.
Not only have contradictions been pointed out in the Bible, people have then denied those and then contradicted themselves and each other.
How is a good, honest Agnostic like me supposed to make sense of this?
Now that Pandora's Box has been opened, Shines, what's your take on some of the later replies?
Last edited by EnglishAdam; Aug 20, 2008 at 09:51 AM.




