~-*-~Follow up to RP's 'VOTE' thread
Originally posted by momalle1
So, having "bad information" is a viable excuse when GW invades another country, but not OK for Kerry when fighting through a campaign?
So, having "bad information" is a viable excuse when GW invades another country, but not OK for Kerry when fighting through a campaign?
Its the main act at spinstock, and sporky dropped the brown acid.
This is the most telling of the embedded reporter who said they didn't see.
"Certainly, some of the soldiers headed off on their own [and] looked through the bunkers just to look at the vast amount of ordnance lying around. But as far as we could tell, there was no move to secure the weapons, nothing to keep looters away," she said."
Originally posted by wittom
Did you hear the kid on Unfiltered yesterday? He was trained by the military and it seems he was trained on what to say on the radio. Truth abounds!
Did you hear the kid on Unfiltered yesterday? He was trained by the military and it seems he was trained on what to say on the radio. Truth abounds!
Re: Re: Re: Serotta
Originally posted by Army of 2 Mom
I do believe you're right arrbilly, I will change that accordingly.
How's the golf game btw?
Golf is not a sport I play well. My putting is pretty good, but my driving leaves a bit to be desired and that's if I can even hit it!
However, I could challenge you to a game of darts.
I'm an ARMY OF 2 MOM and Bush INVITED Iraqi's to attack our CHILDREN with his "BRING ’EM ON" message!
I do believe you're right arrbilly, I will change that accordingly.
How's the golf game btw?
Golf is not a sport I play well. My putting is pretty good, but my driving leaves a bit to be desired and that's if I can even hit it!
However, I could challenge you to a game of darts.
I'm an ARMY OF 2 MOM and Bush INVITED Iraqi's to attack our CHILDREN with his "BRING ’EM ON" message!
Mmmm, darts...
The following is a transcript of an interview aired on MSNBC today:
Amy Robach (AR): And it's still unclear exactly when those explosives disappeared. Here to help shed some light on that question is Lai Ling. She was part of an NBC news crew that traveled to that facility with the 101st Airborne Division back in April of 2003. Lai Ling, can you set the stage for us? What was the situation like when you went into the area?
Lai Ling Jew (LLJ): When we went into the area, we were actually leaving Karbala and we were initially heading to Baghdad with the 101st Airborne, Second Brigade. The situation in Baghdad, the Third Infantry Division had taken over Baghdad and so they were trying to carve up the area that the 101st Airborne Division would be in charge of. As a result, they had trouble figuring out who was going to take up what piece of Baghdad. They sent us over to this area in Iskanderia. We didn't know it as the Qaqaa facility at that point but when they did bring us over there we stayed there for quite a while. We stayed overnight, almost 24 hours. And we walked around, we saw the bunkers that had been bombed, and that exposed all of the ordinances that just lied dormant on the desert.
AR: Was there a search at all underway or did a search ensue for explosives once you got there during that 24-hour period?
LLJ: No. There wasn't a search. The mission that the brigade had was to get to Baghdad. That was more of a pit stop there for us. And, you know, the searching, I mean certainly some of the soldiers head off on their own, looked through the bunkers just to look at the vast amount of ordnance lying around. But as far as we could tell, there was no move to secure the weapons, nothing to keep looters away. But there was - at that point the roads were shut off. So it would have been very difficult, I believe, for the looters to get there.
AR: And there was no talk of securing the area after you left. There was no discussion of that?
LLJ: Not for the 101st Airborne, Second Brigade. They were -- once they were in Baghdad, it was all about Baghdad, you know, and then they ended up moving north to Mosul. Once we left the area, that was the last that the brigade had anything to do with the area.
AR: Well, Lai Ling Jew, thank you so much for shedding some light into that situation. We appreciate it.
LLJ: Thank you.
Amy Robach (AR): And it's still unclear exactly when those explosives disappeared. Here to help shed some light on that question is Lai Ling. She was part of an NBC news crew that traveled to that facility with the 101st Airborne Division back in April of 2003. Lai Ling, can you set the stage for us? What was the situation like when you went into the area?
Lai Ling Jew (LLJ): When we went into the area, we were actually leaving Karbala and we were initially heading to Baghdad with the 101st Airborne, Second Brigade. The situation in Baghdad, the Third Infantry Division had taken over Baghdad and so they were trying to carve up the area that the 101st Airborne Division would be in charge of. As a result, they had trouble figuring out who was going to take up what piece of Baghdad. They sent us over to this area in Iskanderia. We didn't know it as the Qaqaa facility at that point but when they did bring us over there we stayed there for quite a while. We stayed overnight, almost 24 hours. And we walked around, we saw the bunkers that had been bombed, and that exposed all of the ordinances that just lied dormant on the desert.
AR: Was there a search at all underway or did a search ensue for explosives once you got there during that 24-hour period?
LLJ: No. There wasn't a search. The mission that the brigade had was to get to Baghdad. That was more of a pit stop there for us. And, you know, the searching, I mean certainly some of the soldiers head off on their own, looked through the bunkers just to look at the vast amount of ordnance lying around. But as far as we could tell, there was no move to secure the weapons, nothing to keep looters away. But there was - at that point the roads were shut off. So it would have been very difficult, I believe, for the looters to get there.
AR: And there was no talk of securing the area after you left. There was no discussion of that?
LLJ: Not for the 101st Airborne, Second Brigade. They were -- once they were in Baghdad, it was all about Baghdad, you know, and then they ended up moving north to Mosul. Once we left the area, that was the last that the brigade had anything to do with the area.
AR: Well, Lai Ling Jew, thank you so much for shedding some light into that situation. We appreciate it.
LLJ: Thank you.
Don't you get tired of being wrong?
Don't you get tired of being Rove's B!tch?
Don't you get it that shrub and cronies are liars of the first degree?
You call yourself an analytical thinker, a seeker of the truth?
Start exhibiting it more.
Well, as a side note, you know what is ironic, or just plain stupid? Kerry and company talking about dangerous weapons that can cause mass destruction, or weapons of mass destruction…
Did Kerry not state there is NO WMD’S in Iraq, that Iraq was nothing to worry about? Kerry has absolutely NO proof that those weapons were there the day troops arrived and found NONE at the depot. However Kerry is using “intelligence” that tells him there were weapons there, not sure where he got his intelligence but nonetheless he is relying on some kind of intelligence and he is hell bent on the fiction that those weapons were there the day the troops arrived.
So, he is a timid coward man relying on some kind of intelligence that tells him something he has absolutely NO idea about, absolutely NO proof about, but wants everybody to believe him YET it is not ok for the President to rely on intelligence that told us there were WMD’S there, WMD’S that Kerry is now claiming to be there.
Ironic or just plain stupid, you be the judge…
Some of you people backing Kerry have got it really hard. I am really beginning to feel bad for you. Your boy thinks it was the wrong war at the wrong time and Iraq was not a threat, and there was nothing to worry about in Iraq. Now, after removing over 400,000 tons of explosivies your boy is worried about 380 tons missing but yet has NO proof they were there the day our troops arrived.
If he wasn’t worried about the other 400,000 tons why is he so worried about 380 tons or 0.095% that is missing? If Kerry had his way he would have let Iraq keep the complete 400,380 tons of high explosivies or WMD’S.
You all beginning to see a problem with this guy yet?
”I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against the $87 billion…”
“The wrong war at the wrong time for the wrong reason…”
"We need to pass a global test..."
Did Kerry not state there is NO WMD’S in Iraq, that Iraq was nothing to worry about? Kerry has absolutely NO proof that those weapons were there the day troops arrived and found NONE at the depot. However Kerry is using “intelligence” that tells him there were weapons there, not sure where he got his intelligence but nonetheless he is relying on some kind of intelligence and he is hell bent on the fiction that those weapons were there the day the troops arrived.
So, he is a timid coward man relying on some kind of intelligence that tells him something he has absolutely NO idea about, absolutely NO proof about, but wants everybody to believe him YET it is not ok for the President to rely on intelligence that told us there were WMD’S there, WMD’S that Kerry is now claiming to be there.
Ironic or just plain stupid, you be the judge…
Some of you people backing Kerry have got it really hard. I am really beginning to feel bad for you. Your boy thinks it was the wrong war at the wrong time and Iraq was not a threat, and there was nothing to worry about in Iraq. Now, after removing over 400,000 tons of explosivies your boy is worried about 380 tons missing but yet has NO proof they were there the day our troops arrived.
If he wasn’t worried about the other 400,000 tons why is he so worried about 380 tons or 0.095% that is missing? If Kerry had his way he would have let Iraq keep the complete 400,380 tons of high explosivies or WMD’S.
You all beginning to see a problem with this guy yet?
”I voted for the $87 billion before I voted against the $87 billion…”
“The wrong war at the wrong time for the wrong reason…”
"We need to pass a global test..."
Last edited by 01 XLT Sport; Oct 27, 2004 at 05:49 PM.
My My.... how clever.
What Sporky? thats it?
You spouted off so freely when you got the transmission from daddy rove that the explosives weren't there, yea thats it, they weren't there when we got there, thats the ticket.
But when faced with the facts... thats it?
No admission of being used by the dark forces?
No realization that you are once again a fool?
And you still believe that shrub is going to make it?
The only way he getting back in is if he steals it again, because its not the will of the majority of people.
Govener shrub brother is already pulling dirty tricks in florida,
Ohio is also reporting shennanigans, like letters and phone calls telling voters that their polling precinct has moved to another location.
These is the type of people you want running the show?
They haven't bent us over enough already, that you are hoping to give them another go?
How about that loser leaves for 6 months challenge?
If you are so sure of yourself, Sporky...
I've already accepted.
Cluck cluck?
Who's the weak coward?
Huh?
What Sporky? thats it?
You spouted off so freely when you got the transmission from daddy rove that the explosives weren't there, yea thats it, they weren't there when we got there, thats the ticket.
But when faced with the facts... thats it?
No admission of being used by the dark forces?
No realization that you are once again a fool?
And you still believe that shrub is going to make it?
The only way he getting back in is if he steals it again, because its not the will of the majority of people.
Govener shrub brother is already pulling dirty tricks in florida,
Ohio is also reporting shennanigans, like letters and phone calls telling voters that their polling precinct has moved to another location.
These is the type of people you want running the show?
They haven't bent us over enough already, that you are hoping to give them another go?
How about that loser leaves for 6 months challenge?
If you are so sure of yourself, Sporky...
I've already accepted.
Cluck cluck?
Who's the weak coward?
Huh?
Last edited by loudist; Oct 27, 2004 at 06:16 PM.
Originally posted by loudist
What are you blabbering about?
What are you blabbering about?
http://www.unfilteredradio.com/
If you scroll down to the Unfiltered 10/26/04 you will see a link to that optruth site that you have given a link to. They had a "disscussion" with a young soldier recently back from Iraq.
That is what I was "blabbering" about.
Originally posted by wittom
This:
http://www.unfilteredradio.com/
If you scroll down to the Unfiltered 10/26/04 you will see a link to that optruth site that you have given a link to. They had a "disscussion" with a young soldier recently back from Iraq.
That is what I was "blabbering" about.
This:
http://www.unfilteredradio.com/
If you scroll down to the Unfiltered 10/26/04 you will see a link to that optruth site that you have given a link to. They had a "disscussion" with a young soldier recently back from Iraq.
That is what I was "blabbering" about.
Or are you assumeing he doesn't have his own point of view?
I can't imagine you would be listening to that radio program.
Breaking character for a moment.
What is really sad is that no matter who wins, approximately half of the country is going to be scared.
Traumatised by the fear mongering from both sides.
I've never seen this country so polarised.
This is truly the sad outcome, half of our nation will feel a sense of hopelessness and possibly doom.
For how long no one can tell.
The lunar eclipse is tonight... the tribes will be restless.
What is really sad is that no matter who wins, approximately half of the country is going to be scared.
Traumatised by the fear mongering from both sides.
I've never seen this country so polarised.
This is truly the sad outcome, half of our nation will feel a sense of hopelessness and possibly doom.
For how long no one can tell.
The lunar eclipse is tonight... the tribes will be restless.
Originally post by loudist
Breaking character for a moment.
What is really sad is that no matter who wins, approximately half of the country is going to be scared.
Traumatised by the fear mongering from both sides.
I've never seen this country so polarised.
This is truly the sad outcome, half of our nation will feel a sense of hopelessness and possibly doom.
For how long no one can tell.
The lunar eclipse is tonight... the tribes will be restless.
Breaking character for a moment.
What is really sad is that no matter who wins, approximately half of the country is going to be scared.
Traumatised by the fear mongering from both sides.
I've never seen this country so polarised.
This is truly the sad outcome, half of our nation will feel a sense of hopelessness and possibly doom.
For how long no one can tell.
The lunar eclipse is tonight... the tribes will be restless.
This is by far the most intellectual thing you've said. There is hope.
Fox just had a former soldier from the 101 airborn saying he was there at the time these weapons should have been at that site and that he or no one from his unit saw any of the weapons that supposedly came up missing.
He stated there were normal ordinance but there not the explosives that the Times had reported and that Skerry is now saying Bush lost...
Sled...
He stated there were normal ordinance but there not the explosives that the Times had reported and that Skerry is now saying Bush lost...
Sled...



