Bush Killed The One-Fifties!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #46  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by Raptor05121
You're wrong, but then right. I just did a Hydrogen Term Paper for Physical Science class and I learned that the element hydrogen does NOT exist on earth. We have to "mine" it from water with electrolysis methods which are vagely expensive and only produce a very minimal amount of hydrogen. Also, hydrogen is an energy carrier like electricity not an energy producer like fuel. Even then, a hydrogen fuel cell will have to be at the minimum 5x larger than a gasoline tank to hold the same amount. ALSO....the vehicle is run on a motor (I know the British are going to disagree with me on this one, but by definition, a motor is an electrically operated machine while an engine is one run by internal combustion or other means) so basically your "motor" is getting power from an energy "carrier" in this huge-a$$ tank that is holding a very lethal substance (when mixed with an oxygen environment). An example of this is is if you puncture your fuel cell and hydrogen is mixed with O2 and a spark appears, your car is the next Hindenburg, but on a smaller scale. So let's hope the recdnecks don't go off-roading in their hyrodgen-powered "H-150's" (as I assume Ford will name them, pun intended)

-Alex


...getting ready for the 3 million posts to combat mine....
Please tell me you used other sources besides wikipedia for your paper.

@ the goat man!

- NCSU

Edited to Add... Your second sentance is just wrong. The element hydrogen does exist on earth, in many forms, just not naturally in its elemental form. There is a huge difference between the two statements.

and you can run hydrogen in an ICE.
 

Last edited by NCSU_05_FX4; Dec 20, 2007 at 08:20 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #47  
MSH's Avatar
MSH
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
///
 

Last edited by MSH; Mar 10, 2008 at 09:20 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #48  
RacingJake's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
From: Abilene
I think it's time for a few more atomic power plants so we can plug our electric car's and truck's in before bed time.

We better use the power of the nuke before the rest of the worldy nuke's us
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 09:33 AM
  #49  
RacingJake's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
From: Abilene
Originally Posted by MSH
There are a lot of US patents that improve mpg or use other sources of energy. They are bought by oil companies and shelved to protect the demand for their product, OIL.
You got that right, I remember back in the 70's about a car that could get 50 mpg, Some Oil Company showed up and never heard another word about that car.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #50  
scott1981's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Raptor05121
You're wrong, but then right. I just did a Hydrogen Term Paper for Physical Science class and I learned that the element hydrogen does NOT exist on earth. We have to "mine" it from water with electrolysis methods which are vagely expensive and only produce a very minimal amount of hydrogen. Also, hydrogen is an energy carrier like electricity not an energy producer like fuel. Even then, a hydrogen fuel cell will have to be at the minimum 5x larger than a gasoline tank to hold the same amount. ALSO....the vehicle is run on a motor (I know the British are going to disagree with me on this one, but by definition, a motor is an electrically operated machine while an engine is one run by internal combustion or other means) so basically your "motor" is getting power from an energy "carrier" in this huge-a$$ tank that is holding a very lethal substance (when mixed with an oxygen environment). An example of this is is if you puncture your fuel cell and hydrogen is mixed with O2 and a spark appears, your car is the next Hindenburg, but on a smaller scale. So let's hope the recdnecks don't go off-roading in their hyrodgen-powered "H-150's" (as I assume Ford will name them, pun intended)

-Alex


...getting ready for the 3 million posts to combat mine....
Interesting info. Although it has potential problems Ford was able to use it to power the Fusion to over 200mph. I am not so sure 1 answer exist. I think diesel engines in most larger trucks & SUV's would help and hybrid of hydrogen technology for smaller vehicles would work. TRial and error will be a major part of this, the company that comes out with the right answer and markets it properly will be huge in the next 20 years.
 

Last edited by scott1981; Dec 20, 2007 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #51  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Originally Posted by scott1981
Interesting info, looks like the future doesnt have that many great options sadly..
I shout it from the mountaintops and it falls on deaf ears...

GOAT DUNG!
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #52  
shifty_85's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 0
From: farmington hills, MI
haha a nuclear powerd car/truck. id love to see that car accident
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #53  
Raptor05121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 7
From: Live Oak, FL
Originally Posted by NCSU_05_FX4
Please tell me you used other sources besides wikipedia for your paper.
Well, wiki was one of the major roles, I just plucked a few details from other websites to get credit.

Originally Posted by NCSU_05_FX4
The element hydrogen does exist on earth, in many forms, just not naturally in its elemental form.
Right, I meant to say this. It is not available as an element, but is through a compound.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #54  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by MSH
I'm all for a car or truck that runs on tap water. Of course that will never happen. Even if they did have a mass produced engine that runs on water, the auto makers and the oil companies will make sure you still have to go to the corner Exxon and fill up with "special water" that costs $5 a gallon.
"There's this car man, and it runs on water!"


As for
Originally Posted by RacingJake
You got that right, I remember back in the 70's about a car that could get 50 mpg, Some Oil Company showed up and never heard another word about that car.
http://www.snopes.com/autos/business/carburetor.asp

Some of you guys out there are kinda paranoid...

- NCSU
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #55  
Pheonixx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
all you need is 1.21 jigawatts and some bananna peels and a half can of beer...

 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #56  
MercedesTech's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
From: Rohnert Park, CA
Originally Posted by Pheonixx
all you need is 1.21 jigawatts and some bananna peels and a half can of beer...

dude! can't forget the "fluxator Compacitor" ! ! ! most important for fuel effeciency and time travel.

(this thread is a bit off topic I think )
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #57  
Buzzz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by lenore
Maybe it will force the Car manufacturors to get off gas, I would love to stick it to the Arabs and Venezulia scum that soak us dry. Heck they own everything now because of our high oil useage. We should have taken them over and converted to something different. just my 2 cents worth.
Man do you have some learning to do. You think the Arabs force us to use oil? You think they squash all the alternative fuel ideas? Wake up, it's the large oil corporations. They will not let another fuel source to come in and ruin their money train. They will continue to suck us dry by constantly raising gas prices with their petty excuses.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #58  
turtle313's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Dahlgren, VA
Originally Posted by Buzzz
Man do you have some learning to do. You think the Arabs force us to use oil? You think they squash all the alternative fuel ideas? Wake up, it's the large oil corporations. They will not let another fuel source to come in and ruin their money train. They will continue to suck us dry by constantly raising gas prices with their petty excuses.
It's a combined effort. OPEC and Big Oil.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #59  
TheCure's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Over Here
Originally Posted by turtle313
It's a combined effort. OPEC and Big Oil.
I wonder if the conspiracy nuts on a Yaris or Prius bb bitch about big oil or battery conglomerates or do they bitch about people driving 1/2 ton pickups around with nothing in the bed?:santa:
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 02:21 PM
  #60  
turtle313's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Dahlgren, VA
Originally Posted by TheCure
I wonder if the conspiracy nuts on a Yaris or Prius bb bitch about big oil or battery conglomerates or do they bitch about people driving 1/2 ton pickups around with nothing in the bed?:santa:
Are you trying to imply that I'm a conspiracy nut?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.