My Predictions
Just a minor point here. Everyone DOES understand that Rasmussen's polls are always slanted in favor of the GOP, don't they?
Why would you reference a poll that only tells you what you want to hear? You can bet the Romney camp doesn't.
Frank, do I understand you think the President IS a dictator? Is the opinion that he is not, a "Democratic talking point"? It certainly can't be the characterization of the GOP as the "party of NO". That was a stated goal of the Republican leadership. Don't you remember?
- Jack
Why would you reference a poll that only tells you what you want to hear? You can bet the Romney camp doesn't. Frank, do I understand you think the President IS a dictator? Is the opinion that he is not, a "Democratic talking point"? It certainly can't be the characterization of the GOP as the "party of NO". That was a stated goal of the Republican leadership. Don't you remember?
- Jack

Rasmussen's polls are not slanted in favor of the GOP. This is a common falsehood generated by the left wing nutters. They just don't oversample dems as much, that's how they get their results. Rasmussen is the most accurate major pollster out there.
I have no idea how you get the idea that I think the president is a dictator. You must be uptight over the election.
However, when the president's party has control of all 3 branches of gov't, the balance of power is almost non-existent. Let's not try to play word games here. The future of this country is at stake. Especially with newborns now owing over 200,000 dollars in debt. If Romney wins and he doesn't get the job done, we'll go another route in 2016.
Here's a good article that explains how Rasmussen and Gallup sample. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...=feeds-newsxml
You won't get this kind of reporting in Cali or from the 3 blind mice : ABCCBSNBC
You won't get this kind of reporting in Cali or from the 3 blind mice : ABCCBSNBC
There's where you're wrong again, Jack. For my employee's sake. Because if Obamacare is fully implemented, I'll have to let more people go in the next 2-3 years.
- Jack
????
Care to explain that? Is it in anyway like voting for revenge?
You really think Frank WANTS to fire his employees, but is looking for an excuse to provide cover? Got any evidence?
Care to explain that? Is it in anyway like voting for revenge?
You really think Frank WANTS to fire his employees, but is looking for an excuse to provide cover? Got any evidence?
Actually Jack, I am proud to employee people and my desire is to be hiring, not layoffs. My health insurance costs have risen 4 times in the last 30 months.
What has gotten into you?
What has gotten into you?
Alot of these polls that point to an Obama win or that have it all tied up at this point assume that the Democrats will get equal or greater turnout to 2008. The latest CNN poll for example is D+11, which is absurd. This election will come down to turnout, and I don't believe Obama will get as much as he did in 2008. I see turnout being about equal this time, maybe the Democrats get a D+3 advantage in turnout overall, but Romney still wins in that scenario.
Frank--Don't know if this is a possibility for you, but some of the major restaurant chains are cutting many of their full time employees to part time. They are still getting almost the same number of hours, but not quite. It has been a while, but I think it 32 hours instead of 40 hours per week. This prevents the restaurant from having to buy health insurance and keeps them from being fined for not buying. Unfortunately the employees take a double whammy pay cut. They lose actual pay and they have to buy their own health insurance. I haven't heard if the chains are increasing hourly pay to compensate for the shorter hours.
Early voting counts in the states that report early/absentee is already pointing to Obama not getting near the turnout that he got in 2008. I think alot of pollsters are going to have egg on their face by the time this is over.
IMO, Republicans are less likely to talk to pollsters and more likely to turn out.
Heck, with early voting, people here are voting 20 or more times!
Frank, it's always easier to fire people than it is to "work smarter". Putting the blame on the other guy makes it easier for you to look in the mirror. We as a Country have gotten very good at this paradigm. Why don't you start thinking creatively?
- Jack
Frank, it's always easier to fire people than it is to "work smarter". Putting the blame on the other guy makes it easier for you to look in the mirror. We as a Country have gotten very good at this paradigm. Why don't you start thinking creatively?
- Jack







