I am so pi$$ed at Ford- need help
#46
crankshafts
I have been readin posts on this site for more than a year and rarely provide feedback. This crankshaft debate is about all I can take. Without knowing for sure that the cranks are not steel, some people are condemning ford for being cheap. Let me tell you what I see on this site. Some of you are apparently willing to modify your trucks and live with the consequenses. Others believe that they should be able to modify their trucks to whatever level they feel necessary and if it develops a problem, Ford should warranty it and appologize for not making it strong enough to handle the level of boost they are at. Having been a lifelong Ford owner, I have to say I am embarrassed to say I own a Lightning after reading some of these posts. If you are truely that unhappy with Ford products, go over to the other side of the fence (Dodge/Chevy/Toyota/Nissan) where the grass is greener and the warranties are unlimited????? Otherwise, maybe you should man-up and deal with whatever problems your modifications have caused. Really, 21 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end????? I am sure most will not want to hear this, but, it needs to be said.
#47
#48
Originally posted by cyntaxx
The problem here is the fact that Ford put cheaper and weaker parts in than they advertised. This has nothing to do with warranties or mods. This is about Ford advertising certain forged components and not including them.
The problem here is the fact that Ford put cheaper and weaker parts in than they advertised. This has nothing to do with warranties or mods. This is about Ford advertising certain forged components and not including them.
#49
Re: crankshafts
Originally posted by vpat
I have been readin posts on this site for more than a year and rarely provide feedback. This crankshaft debate is about all I can take. Without knowing for sure that the cranks are not steel, some people are condemning ford for being cheap. Let me tell you what I see on this site. Some of you are apparently willing to modify your trucks and live with the consequenses. Others believe that they should be able to modify their trucks to whatever level they feel necessary and if it develops a problem, Ford should warranty it and appologize for not making it strong enough to handle the level of boost they are at. Having been a lifelong Ford owner, I have to say I am embarrassed to say I own a Lightning after reading some of these posts. If you are truely that unhappy with Ford products, go over to the other side of the fence (Dodge/Chevy/Toyota/Nissan) where the grass is greener and the warranties are unlimited????? Otherwise, maybe you should man-up and deal with whatever problems your modifications have caused. Really, 21 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end????? I am sure most will not want to hear this, but, it needs to be said.
I have been readin posts on this site for more than a year and rarely provide feedback. This crankshaft debate is about all I can take. Without knowing for sure that the cranks are not steel, some people are condemning ford for being cheap. Let me tell you what I see on this site. Some of you are apparently willing to modify your trucks and live with the consequenses. Others believe that they should be able to modify their trucks to whatever level they feel necessary and if it develops a problem, Ford should warranty it and appologize for not making it strong enough to handle the level of boost they are at. Having been a lifelong Ford owner, I have to say I am embarrassed to say I own a Lightning after reading some of these posts. If you are truely that unhappy with Ford products, go over to the other side of the fence (Dodge/Chevy/Toyota/Nissan) where the grass is greener and the warranties are unlimited????? Otherwise, maybe you should man-up and deal with whatever problems your modifications have caused. Really, 21 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end????? I am sure most will not want to hear this, but, it needs to be said.
#50
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by cyntaxx
The problem here is the fact that Ford put cheaper and weaker parts in than they advertised. This has nothing to do with warranties or mods. This is about Ford advertising certain forged components and not including them.
The problem here is the fact that Ford put cheaper and weaker parts in than they advertised. This has nothing to do with warranties or mods. This is about Ford advertising certain forged components and not including them.
As I stated before several times, there is no credible evidence that anyone got a cast crank or cast pistons. Everyone should just take a deep breath and wait for evidence.
My posts were clearly qualified as "what ifs" in relation to "what if" questions. Nobody is suing anybody yet. And I would not even participate in, much less file, a suit not grounded on substantial evidence.
And for the record, I am not complaining about any part on my engine (except for the annoying but apparently harmless piston slap).
#52
#53
#54
Originally posted by Calightnin
So far I havent seen anyone say they have a cast crank from the factory build except Alphadoggy. So Id agree. Check it again. Is that your original crank?
Steve
So far I havent seen anyone say they have a cast crank from the factory build except Alphadoggy. So Id agree. Check it again. Is that your original crank?
Steve
#55
#56
Originally posted by cyntaxx
The problem here is the fact that Ford put cheaper and weaker parts in than they advertised. This has nothing to do with warranties or mods. This is about Ford advertising certain forged components and not including them.
The problem here is the fact that Ford put cheaper and weaker parts in than they advertised. This has nothing to do with warranties or mods. This is about Ford advertising certain forged components and not including them.
#57
Originally posted by MaxTorque02
Looks like you have already found Ford guilty by the above statement. You need to learn to make sure you have some facts in place to back up your accusations. To fly off on a whim and accuse Ford of something that nobody knows if they did or not, only makes you and others that have followed, look foolish. I'm not saying that the cranks are forged or cast, but I'm going to wait and see some actual proof before I make accusations towards Ford.
Looks like you have already found Ford guilty by the above statement. You need to learn to make sure you have some facts in place to back up your accusations. To fly off on a whim and accuse Ford of something that nobody knows if they did or not, only makes you and others that have followed, look foolish. I'm not saying that the cranks are forged or cast, but I'm going to wait and see some actual proof before I make accusations towards Ford.
Last edited by cyntaxx; 07-18-2003 at 07:51 PM.
#58
George, one thing to remember if you, indeed, did get a cast crank.
Cast cranks can be very durable if they are prepped right, and balanced properly.
If you keep the RPM within reason, it will probably live long and prosper. It's RPM that kills them.
I've run cast cranks in many high performance applications, and have yet to break one. On my short stroke motors, 6500 RPM has proven to be a safe level.
With our long stroke motors, I probably wouldn't wind them up that tight.
Cast cranks can be very durable if they are prepped right, and balanced properly.
If you keep the RPM within reason, it will probably live long and prosper. It's RPM that kills them.
I've run cast cranks in many high performance applications, and have yet to break one. On my short stroke motors, 6500 RPM has proven to be a safe level.
With our long stroke motors, I probably wouldn't wind them up that tight.
#59
Re: crankshafts
Originally posted by vpat
I have been readin posts on this site for more than a year and rarely provide feedback. This crankshaft debate is about all I can take. Without knowing for sure that the cranks are not steel, some people are condemning ford for being cheap. Let me tell you what I see on this site. Some of you are apparently willing to modify your trucks and live with the consequenses. Others believe that they should be able to modify their trucks to whatever level they feel necessary and if it develops a problem, Ford should warranty it and appologize for not making it strong enough to handle the level of boost they are at. Having been a lifelong Ford owner, I have to say I am embarrassed to say I own a Lightning after reading some of these posts. If you are truely that unhappy with Ford products, go over to the other side of the fence (Dodge/Chevy/Toyota/Nissan) where the grass is greener and the warranties are unlimited????? Otherwise, maybe you should man-up and deal with whatever problems your modifications have caused. Really, 21 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end????? I am sure most will not want to hear this, but, it needs to be said.
I have been readin posts on this site for more than a year and rarely provide feedback. This crankshaft debate is about all I can take. Without knowing for sure that the cranks are not steel, some people are condemning ford for being cheap. Let me tell you what I see on this site. Some of you are apparently willing to modify your trucks and live with the consequenses. Others believe that they should be able to modify their trucks to whatever level they feel necessary and if it develops a problem, Ford should warranty it and appologize for not making it strong enough to handle the level of boost they are at. Having been a lifelong Ford owner, I have to say I am embarrassed to say I own a Lightning after reading some of these posts. If you are truely that unhappy with Ford products, go over to the other side of the fence (Dodge/Chevy/Toyota/Nissan) where the grass is greener and the warranties are unlimited????? Otherwise, maybe you should man-up and deal with whatever problems your modifications have caused. Really, 21 pounds of boost on a stock bottom end????? I am sure most will not want to hear this, but, it needs to be said.
Last edited by alphadoggy; 07-19-2003 at 03:11 PM.