Calling Johnny Lightning
Originally posted by 99svtlightning
Not flaming you or anything...but what makes you think that KB or anyone else for that matter would reply to your fax? I can see KB taking the time for a magazine article or something or that nature. Think about it, some guy off the boards calls your business asking for a showdown?
Not flaming you or anything...but what makes you think that KB or anyone else for that matter would reply to your fax? I can see KB taking the time for a magazine article or something or that nature. Think about it, some guy off the boards calls your business asking for a showdown?
Personally, I think KB should step up to the plate. This is a real test from a person that has neither of the two, just wants the real facts. Both blowers could be installed at the shop, tested and returned, or taken back by the WORKS or KB rep on site.
He has formally made a offer, its no different than someone saying, Hey LIGHTNING SHOOTOUT AT CECIL!! Heads up fastest truck wins and becomes TOP DOG!!
I praise you for trying so hard Marcus. I hope this happens. There is no reason it sholdnt unless people are just to scared to see the results.
One little test could prove alot.... One "COULD" be better than the other, They could be "SO CLOSE" it comes down to personal prefferance. Lastly, Only one of the Blower Vendors has said yes and if the other dosent, THAT WILL LOOK BAD IMO!
Originally posted by BLackBoLT99
Who says I haven't contacted a magazine? And no flame taken or intended, but if they are so sure about their product, then why can't they send someone down with a blower, doing the test and then taking the blower back and leaving with the results. (Not some crap that was in the mags with a "bazooka" air tube, 25psi on a stock bottom end, racing fuel and "no chip" B.S. ) because, maybe you're smart enough to realize, gee that's b/s if I put 25 psi to a stock bottom end it will blow, but I KNOW there are some here, and all around the world that actually believed that it wouldn't. So, if they don't have time for little ol' me, and whoever else wants to know, what's to say they'll have time for a potential customer asking questions, or a current customer with a service issue? Not directly related, but to me, falls in the same category of customer service. Wheather it be potential customer, or current customer. Sure it's a long shot, but all I see so far is WORKS, standing behind their product, with pride, willing, wanting and waiting to go through with this little test.
p.s. Just because all you've seen me talk about here is "Come on KB/JL, where are you" Doesn't mean I haven't contacted a Chip Tuner, with an in house Dyno, and a wideband a/f reader, and different magazines.
Who says I haven't contacted a magazine? And no flame taken or intended, but if they are so sure about their product, then why can't they send someone down with a blower, doing the test and then taking the blower back and leaving with the results. (Not some crap that was in the mags with a "bazooka" air tube, 25psi on a stock bottom end, racing fuel and "no chip" B.S. ) because, maybe you're smart enough to realize, gee that's b/s if I put 25 psi to a stock bottom end it will blow, but I KNOW there are some here, and all around the world that actually believed that it wouldn't. So, if they don't have time for little ol' me, and whoever else wants to know, what's to say they'll have time for a potential customer asking questions, or a current customer with a service issue? Not directly related, but to me, falls in the same category of customer service. Wheather it be potential customer, or current customer. Sure it's a long shot, but all I see so far is WORKS, standing behind their product, with pride, willing, wanting and waiting to go through with this little test.
p.s. Just because all you've seen me talk about here is "Come on KB/JL, where are you" Doesn't mean I haven't contacted a Chip Tuner, with an in house Dyno, and a wideband a/f reader, and different magazines.
Also, I can't understand your post. Do you mean that you think a stock bottom end will take 25psi? I can gaurantee you that a stock bottom end will not take 25psi very long. All things things being perfect, it will last for a while. But the first time any issue develops(and it will), fuel starvation due to low fuel, bad gas, drastic change in weather...your motor will blow. At 25psi you are darn near 700hp at the crank, almost double what Ford intended.
Originally posted by reality1
I would not hesitate to install either Blower on my Truck that is backed by either Sal or JL
Having said that, I think we need a package that includes a roll cage.
I think it would be nice if one of the tuners set up a jig so that the steel can be uniform, cut and nibbled and shipped via frieght truck to be welded and installed locally.
I really like Dons' cage and I think I am quoting him correctly as saying that his was about the fifth to be built by this particular party and they finally got it right.
I would hate to install a cage and then find out I can't move the seat or it is not NHRA legal
Jim
I would not hesitate to install either Blower on my Truck that is backed by either Sal or JL
Having said that, I think we need a package that includes a roll cage.
I think it would be nice if one of the tuners set up a jig so that the steel can be uniform, cut and nibbled and shipped via frieght truck to be welded and installed locally.
I really like Dons' cage and I think I am quoting him correctly as saying that his was about the fifth to be built by this particular party and they finally got it right.
I would hate to install a cage and then find out I can't move the seat or it is not NHRA legal
Jim
Originally posted by ICULOKN
I dont think I agree with that at all. Usually its the "LITTLE" people that bring alot to the table. Thats how big things get started. PSP, JLP, JDM, & REM did not get started by buying spots in magazines they went out and "PROVED THEMSELVES" and the product they offer.
Personally, I think KB should step up to the plate. This is a real test from a person that has neither of the two, just wants the real facts. Both blowers could be installed at the shop, tested and returned, or taken back by the WORKS or KB rep on site.
He has formally made a offer, its no different than someone saying, Hey LIGHTNING SHOOTOUT AT CECIL!! Heads up fastest truck wins and becomes TOP DOG!!
I praise you for trying so hard Marcus. I hope this happens. There is no reason it sholdnt unless people are just to scared to see the results.
One little test could prove alot.... One "COULD" be better than the other, They could be "SO CLOSE" it comes down to personal prefferance. Lastly, Only one of the Blower Vendors has said yes and if the other dosent, THAT WILL LOOK BAD IMO!
I dont think I agree with that at all. Usually its the "LITTLE" people that bring alot to the table. Thats how big things get started. PSP, JLP, JDM, & REM did not get started by buying spots in magazines they went out and "PROVED THEMSELVES" and the product they offer.
Personally, I think KB should step up to the plate. This is a real test from a person that has neither of the two, just wants the real facts. Both blowers could be installed at the shop, tested and returned, or taken back by the WORKS or KB rep on site.
He has formally made a offer, its no different than someone saying, Hey LIGHTNING SHOOTOUT AT CECIL!! Heads up fastest truck wins and becomes TOP DOG!!
I praise you for trying so hard Marcus. I hope this happens. There is no reason it sholdnt unless people are just to scared to see the results.
One little test could prove alot.... One "COULD" be better than the other, They could be "SO CLOSE" it comes down to personal prefferance. Lastly, Only one of the Blower Vendors has said yes and if the other dosent, THAT WILL LOOK BAD IMO!
While you guys are trying to get the impossible done, call up Dodge and Ford so they can do a 1/4th mile shootout with their '04 Ram SRT-10 against an '03 Lightning...
Or call up REM, JL, JDM, and PSP and have them meet at a dyno facility with their equipment and see who can get a stock lightning to get the best dyno and 1/4th mile #'s.
It is not going to happen and neither is this test between KB and Works blowers. It is obvious that many people have already ordered what they think is better for them. In a few months you will see the results. Those who have choosen to wait and see will be better informed than those who have already placed orders.
Or call up REM, JL, JDM, and PSP and have them meet at a dyno facility with their equipment and see who can get a stock lightning to get the best dyno and 1/4th mile #'s.
It is not going to happen and neither is this test between KB and Works blowers. It is obvious that many people have already ordered what they think is better for them. In a few months you will see the results. Those who have choosen to wait and see will be better informed than those who have already placed orders.
I dont think much has been proven at all.
These types of tests happen all the time, people get together and do some real testing. I guess if KB dont want to do it, someone will just buy both and do real testing for all of us.
Turning the boost up is not a option. The test is for both blowers at the Same Boost, on the same truck, with the same person tuning them, within HOURS of each dyno. True more power could be had if PSP or JLP was TWEAKING the trucks to their specs. I think it would be easy for anyone to see why this should happen.
I see it like this right now.....
WORKS Trucks
Many have been riding around testing the blower for over 10,000 miles.
There is one truck with over 70,000 on it, and 20,000 of it is with the 140.
All of the dyno charts for the works have looked great and made some serious power.
The ones that have been to the track layed good numbers down
The 112 and some NOS is the fastest Lightning through the 1/4 Mile right now.
Most of the test trucks are on STOCK bottom end trucks.
Most of these trucks are running around 15-16lbs of boost.
One Known WORKS failure, reason unknown.
KB Trucks
I know of a few JLP trucks with the KB.
Many have Dynoed with great power.
Most of the trucks with the KB run very well through the 1/4 mile
JLP has the fastest Non-NOS truck through the 1/4 with a KB on it right now
Most of the trucks testing the KB are built up trucks
Most of these trucks are running 17+ lbs of boost
4 Known Failures with the KB blower, reason unknown
TO me the testing there is really no help. Its not true testing in the same conditions. You have Built motor Race trucks verse you average street player.
How to make a true test of the two? Reread the first part of this post.
These types of tests happen all the time, people get together and do some real testing. I guess if KB dont want to do it, someone will just buy both and do real testing for all of us.
Turning the boost up is not a option. The test is for both blowers at the Same Boost, on the same truck, with the same person tuning them, within HOURS of each dyno. True more power could be had if PSP or JLP was TWEAKING the trucks to their specs. I think it would be easy for anyone to see why this should happen.
I see it like this right now.....
WORKS Trucks
Many have been riding around testing the blower for over 10,000 miles.
There is one truck with over 70,000 on it, and 20,000 of it is with the 140.
All of the dyno charts for the works have looked great and made some serious power.
The ones that have been to the track layed good numbers down
The 112 and some NOS is the fastest Lightning through the 1/4 Mile right now.
Most of the test trucks are on STOCK bottom end trucks.
Most of these trucks are running around 15-16lbs of boost.
One Known WORKS failure, reason unknown.
KB Trucks
I know of a few JLP trucks with the KB.
Many have Dynoed with great power.
Most of the trucks with the KB run very well through the 1/4 mile
JLP has the fastest Non-NOS truck through the 1/4 with a KB on it right now
Most of the trucks testing the KB are built up trucks
Most of these trucks are running 17+ lbs of boost
4 Known Failures with the KB blower, reason unknown
TO me the testing there is really no help. Its not true testing in the same conditions. You have Built motor Race trucks verse you average street player.
How to make a true test of the two? Reread the first part of this post.
Originally posted by ICULOKN
WORKS Trucks
Many have been riding around testing the blower for over 10,000 miles.
There is one truck with over 70,000 on it, and 20,000 of it is with the 140.
All of the dyno charts for the works have looked great and made some serious power.
The ones that have been to the track layed good numbers down
The 112 and some NOS is the fastest Lightning through the 1/4 Mile right now.
Most of the test trucks are on STOCK bottom end trucks.
Most of these trucks are running around 15-16lbs of boost.
One Known WORKS failure, reason unknown.
KB Trucks
I know of a few JLP trucks with the KB.
Many have Dynoed with great power.
Most of the trucks with the KB run very well through the 1/4 mile
JLP has the fastest Non-NOS truck through the 1/4 with a KB on it right now
Most of the trucks testing the KB are built up trucks
Most of these trucks are running 17+ lbs of boost
4 Known Failures with the KB blower, reason unknown
WORKS Trucks
Many have been riding around testing the blower for over 10,000 miles.
There is one truck with over 70,000 on it, and 20,000 of it is with the 140.
All of the dyno charts for the works have looked great and made some serious power.
The ones that have been to the track layed good numbers down
The 112 and some NOS is the fastest Lightning through the 1/4 Mile right now.
Most of the test trucks are on STOCK bottom end trucks.
Most of these trucks are running around 15-16lbs of boost.
One Known WORKS failure, reason unknown.
KB Trucks
I know of a few JLP trucks with the KB.
Many have Dynoed with great power.
Most of the trucks with the KB run very well through the 1/4 mile
JLP has the fastest Non-NOS truck through the 1/4 with a KB on it right now
Most of the trucks testing the KB are built up trucks
Most of these trucks are running 17+ lbs of boost
4 Known Failures with the KB blower, reason unknown
WORKS
Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year.
The works blower which failed for unknown reason wasn't covered under warranty.
KB
JL burnt a valve last year while running a prototype KB (small) blower.
New KB was retooled after failures.
Originally posted by easterisland
WORKS
Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year.
WORKS
Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year.
Dammit, don't turn my thread into another bitch fight!!!!! If this is what it'll turn into, I'll ask Doug or Steve to lock it, if he doesn't get to it first
I'm not one to give up(not in my nature), so thank you 99 and Easter for expressing your views on KB not possibly wanting to, but until I hear it from the horses mouth, I'm going to keep trying.
I do feel the same way Rich does though. If one party has agreed to play, why not the second party? Going by your scenario, "Summit and Jegs" or "Ford and Chevy" either way, no matter what name you give it, ONE party has said yes.
I won't be getting ANY personal gain from this, and ontop of that, I run a very big risk of EITHER blower blowing my rods out. But I do want to know the, "what's what and who's who" of aftermarket superchargers.
And 99, what I meant about the 25psi thing was, two magazines ran the story on the KB blower (basically the same article). In it, they mentioned things like, "stock bottom end" and "NO chip", and "bazooka air tube". With that they reported 500+ hp. I know alot people believed that article. But you and I know that 25psi, on a non chipped, stock bottom end Lightning will blow.. and who in the hell is going to have a damn PVC pipe w/ filter hanging out the side of their hood?
I want the tests done right. The right tune, the right plugs, the right readings and measurements, and the right opinions, facts, and data given about BOTH s/c. If KB and WORKS want to take it to the drag strip. I've been known to hit up the 1/4 and do pretty damn well if I may say so. If they want to ttest it on a stock truck at low boost (me), and then on a built truck at high boost, I'm sure I can find a few built L's out here as well. It'll still be two highly un-biased tests.
I'm not one to give up(not in my nature), so thank you 99 and Easter for expressing your views on KB not possibly wanting to, but until I hear it from the horses mouth, I'm going to keep trying.
I do feel the same way Rich does though. If one party has agreed to play, why not the second party? Going by your scenario, "Summit and Jegs" or "Ford and Chevy" either way, no matter what name you give it, ONE party has said yes.
I won't be getting ANY personal gain from this, and ontop of that, I run a very big risk of EITHER blower blowing my rods out. But I do want to know the, "what's what and who's who" of aftermarket superchargers.
And 99, what I meant about the 25psi thing was, two magazines ran the story on the KB blower (basically the same article). In it, they mentioned things like, "stock bottom end" and "NO chip", and "bazooka air tube". With that they reported 500+ hp. I know alot people believed that article. But you and I know that 25psi, on a non chipped, stock bottom end Lightning will blow.. and who in the hell is going to have a damn PVC pipe w/ filter hanging out the side of their hood?
I want the tests done right. The right tune, the right plugs, the right readings and measurements, and the right opinions, facts, and data given about BOTH s/c. If KB and WORKS want to take it to the drag strip. I've been known to hit up the 1/4 and do pretty damn well if I may say so. If they want to ttest it on a stock truck at low boost (me), and then on a built truck at high boost, I'm sure I can find a few built L's out here as well. It'll still be two highly un-biased tests.
Originally posted by LightningTuner
Uhh, would you care to elaborate on that, because I sure don't know what you're talking about.
Uhh, would you care to elaborate on that, because I sure don't know what you're talking about.
Here are a couple of quotes I found by searching.
Sal said, "Well, I can't say it was easy. Made some changes to the truck over the winter, and was plagued with gremlins since then. Broken parts, poor traction, tuning new combo, etc.,etc." 4/27/02
"...too bad sal broke a valve spring...." taken from a PSP customer. 4/09/2002
You're comment was- "Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year." That comment undeniably says that I had engine problems related to/because of the Works 112. You can't mean otherwise, because then your statement would have nothing to do with this blower thread.
Since I've heard lots of interesting "stories" from other vendors about my problems last year, let me clear up the air. I had a broken valve spring at the GA NMRA. That issue was resolved and was not related to the blower. I had head gasket SEALING issues with a new style of gasket I was trying, that had a secondary bore shim that kept falling out of place when the heads were placed on the motor. That issue has also been resolved and also was not blower related. My third problem, was that I was trying a custom fuel system, and since I was the first person to go with a custom rail/lines/cell setup, there were lots of bugs to be worked out. One of those bugs was a faulty aftermarket regulator, that sometimes worked and sometimes didn't, giving me all sorts of fuel delivery issues for quite a while. That issue has been resolved, and was ALSO not blower related.
So since none of my "engine problems" were related to my Works 112, it's quite obvious to me that all you are doing now is grasping any piece of information that you can find, to argue your losing debates, since you never have anything nice to say anymore on this board, and can never be wrong no matter how wrong you are proven.
Since I've heard lots of interesting "stories" from other vendors about my problems last year, let me clear up the air. I had a broken valve spring at the GA NMRA. That issue was resolved and was not related to the blower. I had head gasket SEALING issues with a new style of gasket I was trying, that had a secondary bore shim that kept falling out of place when the heads were placed on the motor. That issue has also been resolved and also was not blower related. My third problem, was that I was trying a custom fuel system, and since I was the first person to go with a custom rail/lines/cell setup, there were lots of bugs to be worked out. One of those bugs was a faulty aftermarket regulator, that sometimes worked and sometimes didn't, giving me all sorts of fuel delivery issues for quite a while. That issue has been resolved, and was ALSO not blower related.
So since none of my "engine problems" were related to my Works 112, it's quite obvious to me that all you are doing now is grasping any piece of information that you can find, to argue your losing debates, since you never have anything nice to say anymore on this board, and can never be wrong no matter how wrong you are proven.
Originally posted by LightningTuner
You're comment was- "Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year." That comment undeniably says that I had engine problems related to/because of the Works 112. You can't mean otherwise, because then your statement would have nothing to do with this blower thread.
Since I've heard lots of interesting "stories" from other vendors about my problems last year, let me clear up the air. I had a broken valve spring at the GA NMRA. That issue was resolved and was not related to the blower. I had head gasket SEALING issues with a new style of gasket I was trying, that had a secondary bore shim that kept falling out of place when the heads were placed on the motor. That issue has also been resolved and also was not blower related. My third problem, was that I was trying a custom fuel system, and since I was the first person to go with a custom rail/lines/cell setup, there were lots of bugs to be worked out. One of those bugs was a faulty aftermarket regulator, that sometimes worked and sometimes didn't, giving me all sorts of fuel delivery issues for quite a while. That issue has been resolved, and was ALSO not blower related.
So since none of my "engine problems" were related to my Works 112, it's quite obvious to me that all you are doing now is grasping any piece of information that you can find, to argue your losing debates, since you never have anything nice to say anymore on this board, and can never be wrong no matter how wrong you are proven.
You're comment was- "Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year." That comment undeniably says that I had engine problems related to/because of the Works 112. You can't mean otherwise, because then your statement would have nothing to do with this blower thread.
Since I've heard lots of interesting "stories" from other vendors about my problems last year, let me clear up the air. I had a broken valve spring at the GA NMRA. That issue was resolved and was not related to the blower. I had head gasket SEALING issues with a new style of gasket I was trying, that had a secondary bore shim that kept falling out of place when the heads were placed on the motor. That issue has also been resolved and also was not blower related. My third problem, was that I was trying a custom fuel system, and since I was the first person to go with a custom rail/lines/cell setup, there were lots of bugs to be worked out. One of those bugs was a faulty aftermarket regulator, that sometimes worked and sometimes didn't, giving me all sorts of fuel delivery issues for quite a while. That issue has been resolved, and was ALSO not blower related.
So since none of my "engine problems" were related to my Works 112, it's quite obvious to me that all you are doing now is grasping any piece of information that you can find, to argue your losing debates, since you never have anything nice to say anymore on this board, and can never be wrong no matter how wrong you are proven.
I said, "Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year." How do I know that all of your problems were not related to the blower? You say they aren't blower related. I say you had problems. I never said you had problems because the 112 caused them. If I had known for certain your problems stemmed from the M112 I would have said, Sal has had many problems due to the works 112.
I don't know for sure JL burned his valve because of the KB. However, I used the same basic wording with him.
I've been trying to be fair here, so just chill out.
I have had engine problems with my truck. They have been with the Roush suspension installed. The engine problems I have experienced are due to, or because of the amount of nitrous I was running.
Originally posted by easterisland
How do I know that all of your problems were not related to the blower?
How do I know that all of your problems were not related to the blower?
The fuel problem had the back injectors not getting enuff fuel if I remember right. That was not due to the 112 was it? LOL
If you weren't sure, then you shouldn't have said anything. Or maybe you should try ASKING about an issue for once in your life, instead of jumping into heated debates with information you are not sure of.
"Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year."
"Sal has had many problems due to the works 112."
As far as I'm concerned, that's the same thing. This is a blower thread, talking about quality and reliability of the different blowers, so there is no possible way for your comment to NOT be taken as I was having problems with my motor due to the blower. If that was the case, then the statement doesn't even apply to this topic.
"Sal has had many engine problems with the works 112 last year."
"Sal has had many problems due to the works 112."
As far as I'm concerned, that's the same thing. This is a blower thread, talking about quality and reliability of the different blowers, so there is no possible way for your comment to NOT be taken as I was having problems with my motor due to the blower. If that was the case, then the statement doesn't even apply to this topic.


