Michael Jackson
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
Originally Posted by arrbilly
otherwise it would have been a dem landslide... 
So, even though it was 2 against one, I had to do my best to insure the integrity of the state was maintained. However, I failed and it went Dem, that’s ok I got something for Raoul’s goat in 2008…
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, and Delaware
XLT and ARR
GO HILLARY IN '08!!!!!! She's gonna kick butt if she runs. Too many people love her to much.
I'm out for now, but will be sure to follow up on all this crap later.
When there is time less valued to waiste on such nonsense.
I'm out for now, but will be sure to follow up on all this crap later.
When there is time less valued to waiste on such nonsense.
Last edited by ureagletz; Jun 14, 2005 at 08:56 PM.
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, and Delaware
Pretty funny for a 15 year old... YOU'RE ONLY 15!!! SHOULDN'T YOU BE IN BED BY NOW. GO AND KISS YOUR MOMMY AND DADDY GOOD NIGHT AND GET YOUR BUTT IN BED!!!!! No wonder you have repeated 5th grade so many times.
Which by the way it's for "a" 15 year old not "an" 15 year old, duh.
Try again!
T
Which by the way it's for "a" 15 year old not "an" 15 year old, duh.
Try again!
T
Last edited by ureagletz; Jun 14, 2005 at 08:58 PM.
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, and Delaware
Raoul
Don't know what you're trying to say by that but what ever I guess.
I mean if the woman wants to go and break the rules, then fine go ahead break them. But be ready to take what you got coming. I have complete respect for her now. I might even go so far as to watch whatever she has on tv now, though boring as it may be just because she made the right decisions.
No pun intended
I mean if the woman wants to go and break the rules, then fine go ahead break them. But be ready to take what you got coming. I have complete respect for her now. I might even go so far as to watch whatever she has on tv now, though boring as it may be just because she made the right decisions.
No pun intended
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in the EU
Dear ureagletz,
You claim to be a "financial writer" and then chide someone on his or her incorrect word usage. However, in your response to cia-agent:
I count at least eight grammar/spelling/incorrect word usage errors above. There are five (actually six but we’ll let one go) incomplete sentences, no question mark after a question, and you misspelled respectable. Also, it’s break, not brake, and nevertheless is one word.
Later, you continue your butchering of the English language with:
The above contains two errors (three if you count “gonna”). The last "sentence" is not actually a complete sentence and you misspelled waste.
Then you responded to Burt with this gem:
I'm just wondering, are the tears poor, or were you implying that Burt is the poor one?
Then, of course, you impressed us with your command of the English language (because you're a writer) with this:
In your attempt to belittle someone for their grammar, you write a paragraph that has three errors in it; you’re missing a question mark, good-night is hyphenated, and it’s wonder, not wander.
To quote you . . . try again.
Oh, and by the way, as a "financial writer", in your response to cia-agent, I am surprised that you did not correct him for his apparent misunderstanding of why Martha went to jail. It would seem to me that a financial writer would point out to someone that Martha did not do time for insider trading, but rather was convicted for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to federal investigators. The judge in her case dismissed the most serious charges of securities fraud.
Just out of curiosity, who is it that employs you as a financial writer, Mad magazine? Do you often exhibit a lack of knowledge over such simple financial issues as Martha Stewart? More importantly, are your printed articles as poorly written as your posts are, demonstrating a lack of knowledge of basic grammar?
I’m not even going to comment on the David Duke reference.
You’re new here, and you’ve made it clear that you are here for no other reason than to cause trouble. Please don’t.
You claim to be a "financial writer" and then chide someone on his or her incorrect word usage. However, in your response to cia-agent:
As a financial writer, I know the consequences of giving that sort of information away. I keep to my "Insider Trading Agreements" like they were the only thread my life is hanging on. When I decide to buy, sell, or trade stocks I do it only when it is legal for me to do so. Which by the way normally sets me at the end of the line just like the next guy. But never the less I know to NEVER brake my agreement.
I do, however, agree that she made the most repectable decision to just do her time and just deal with it. Had she gone through all the pain staking process of appeals then I would be sick of her too. The biggest reason why I am now Pro Martha (even though her prison was a day camp). Had Michael done the same then I would be less bitter towards him. But he just can't face up to the fact that what he is doing is wrong.
It's only now that he announces that he will not allow any more kids to sleep in his bed. Now that he was so close the cell block that he can smell Bubba's bung. Why couldn't he have had that already taken care of. All the money he has he could have had any man or woman he wanted legally. Shamefully that isn't his liking.
I do, however, agree that she made the most repectable decision to just do her time and just deal with it. Had she gone through all the pain staking process of appeals then I would be sick of her too. The biggest reason why I am now Pro Martha (even though her prison was a day camp). Had Michael done the same then I would be less bitter towards him. But he just can't face up to the fact that what he is doing is wrong.
It's only now that he announces that he will not allow any more kids to sleep in his bed. Now that he was so close the cell block that he can smell Bubba's bung. Why couldn't he have had that already taken care of. All the money he has he could have had any man or woman he wanted legally. Shamefully that isn't his liking.
Later, you continue your butchering of the English language with:
GO HILLARY IN '08!!!!!! She's gonna kick butt if she runs. Too many people love her to much.
I'm out for now, but will be sure to follow up on all this crap later.
When there is time less valued to waiste on such nonsense."
I'm out for now, but will be sure to follow up on all this crap later.
When there is time less valued to waiste on such nonsense."
Then you responded to Burt with this gem:
"Yeah, here's one for you so you can wipe your poor little tears away."
I'm just wondering, are the tears poor, or were you implying that Burt is the poor one?
Then, of course, you impressed us with your command of the English language (because you're a writer) with this:
"Pretty funny for a 15 year old... YOU'RE ONLY 15!!! SHOULDN'T YOU BE IN BED BY NOW. GO AND KISS YOUR MOMMY AND DADDY GOOD NIGHT AND GET YOUR BUTT IN BED!!!!! No wander you have repeated 5th grade so many times.
Which by the way it's for "a" 15 year old not "an" 15 year old, duh.
Try again!
T
Which by the way it's for "a" 15 year old not "an" 15 year old, duh.
Try again!
T
To quote you . . . try again.
Oh, and by the way, as a "financial writer", in your response to cia-agent, I am surprised that you did not correct him for his apparent misunderstanding of why Martha went to jail. It would seem to me that a financial writer would point out to someone that Martha did not do time for insider trading, but rather was convicted for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to federal investigators. The judge in her case dismissed the most serious charges of securities fraud.
Just out of curiosity, who is it that employs you as a financial writer, Mad magazine? Do you often exhibit a lack of knowledge over such simple financial issues as Martha Stewart? More importantly, are your printed articles as poorly written as your posts are, demonstrating a lack of knowledge of basic grammar?
I’m not even going to comment on the David Duke reference.
You’re new here, and you’ve made it clear that you are here for no other reason than to cause trouble. Please don’t.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Dear ureagletz,
You're a$$ just got owned by kobiashi biotch! Do me a favor, **** and put a plug in your chili hole. Yeah, I know... We all know that ain't gonna happen. So just keep it up. See what happens. 
Have a nice day and Bon Voyage'. 
You're a$$ just got owned by kobiashi biotch!
Do me a favor, **** and put a plug in your chili hole. Yeah, I know... We all know that ain't gonna happen. So just keep it up. See what happens. Have a nice day and Bon Voyage'.
