I was going to post a response to him calling me a "moron", but I realized that he can't help himself. A man without a solid defense and no offense will attempt to bring his opponents down to his level.

I especially think it's funny that he has continually attacked Sport with his immature name calling and Sport is to smart to take the bait (way to go Sport).

I truly respect CIA-Agent and most of the other liberals here for their opinions and they way they present themselves. They're a great asset to have on the board, no matter how wrong they are (j/k). On the other hand, I'm glad loudest doesn't support President Bush, it would be too embarrasing to think we have anything in common.

 

It boils down to this…

Those who can not debate intelligently without the name calling, put downs or goofy intimidation just don’t have a legitimate or logical position to stand on. They are going on what has been implanted into their skulls from weak coward people like Kerry and company who have never really done anything to help people. Kerry and company, liberals in general, have done there very best to split America up into little slices. They have done this through class, age, education level and even skin color.

Many liberal democrats, not all but many are the biggest racist group in America. Kerry is a prime example of that.

NO, poor people do not deserve what us busting our *** have. NO the lazy do not deserve what us busting our *** have. NO the homeless do not deserve what us busting our *** have. The reason none of those particular groups of whiners deserve what us busting our *** have is because they are unwilling to bust their own *** to get it.

There are needy is this country but the “truly” needy is such a very small group if you weeded out all the liberal whiners sitting on their *** off the public pay roll you would have enough cash to make the few needy much richer then any of us busting our *** are.

Those are the FACTS.

Anyhow you can tell those that debate with true convictions, true logic, and a proper thought process because they do so with out the need of name calling, put downs or goofy intimidation. It is called a strong mind vs. a weak mind and the weak mind will always lose…

 

Oh yea, my neighbor served 3 tours in Vietnam and he sees Kerry for the traitor that he is.

Interesting information that CNN had on today. Seems the military backs President Bush overwhelmingly. Wonder why that would be if President Bush treats them (and me) as bad as Kerry says.

 

Like herr cheney.. 'wahhh, he talked about my lesbo daughter, even though I did more than once... waaaa'
Theres your crybaby, as well as your grandpa's definition of a weak mind all rolled ito one.

I feel there is a lack of confidence from you guys in whether shrub is gonna make it, a sort of desperation.

So you are finally admitting shrub is going to lose.
Don't you feel better now.

uhhh, politics? career survival?
you can't be that much of a moro... idio... republican, can you?

Don't worry Nick, you'll be needy soon enough.

 

 

Dang! Now what am I gonna put on that steak burt is buying me.

I'm gonna need somethin

Raoul, "You call this a steak!"
Burt, "It came from a cow!"
Raoul, "Before or after it was a shoe?"

(Who says we have to stop going at it after the election)

 

Once again we have normal liberal retoric. Its called a straw man and it is an illogical fallacy. This is where the individual takes the issue at hand, twist the issue and attacks the twisted issue, disregarding (and ignoring) the original issue. Thanks for helping me teach debate class loudist!

~Colby

 

We now have fairly compelling evidence, in the form of a Military Times survey of its readership (primarily career military officers and enlisted personnel), that reports of the demise of Bush's popularity were premature. By an astonishing 72 to 17 percent margin, the active-duty military personnel who took the survey favored Bush over Kerry (Guard and Reserve respondents favored Bush, 73 to 18 percent). Frankly, the margin greatly exceeds anything that I or any other analyst had expected.

This goes to PROVE why the democrats will do everything in their power to throw out as many military votes as possible as they did in Florida in 2000.

The military does NOT want some weak coward timid man like Kerry leading them because Kerry will completely ignore them as he did with those he stabbed in the back in Vietnam. Kerry is not nor has he ever been concerned with those in the military and those serving know that for a FACT or there would not be over 70% support for President Bush.

Do NOT over look another very important aspect which is the Guards and Reserves who too support President Bush by over 70%.

Talk about land slides, the military has given Kerry what he deserves a major defeat and told Kerry they do not want a weak coward timid man as a follower but a true leader to lead them, they want President Bush as their Commander In Chief…

 

So that was shrub's style in the debates.
Thanks!

 

gentlemen, to be fair it seems to me that both sides are masters of using the straw man in debates.

 

Military Times is owed by who? Gannett

A revelation that the military votes primarily republican?
Not in the least.

So on one hand splort, you site a magazine poll, very scientific <-sarcasm), and the results are heavily right wing, no surprise there as historically the military has been right wing almost exclusevely, although I was surprised at how well Kerry is reported doing in that poll, which makes it even more suspect.

Your 'weak coward timid' describes perfectly shrubs actions all his life.
coward, pulled strings for guard duty knowing the guard wouldn't see combat therefore avoiding any danger.
weak, as in minded, lucky to have 2 sypapses fireing in the right order.
timid, sits quietly with a deer caught in the headlights expression while we were under attack on 9/11. (also see weak.)