S&B/Evolution 07 5.4
Aren't the gains from any of these cold air intake systems minimal at best, even when properly tuned? 10% power gains mentioned in this thread seem pretty high, most actual dyno tests I've seen are more in the range of 5-8 horsepower and maybe 1 mpg increase. I'd be willing to bet the average joe would not feel the seat of the pants difference of 7hp on a 6000lb vehicle. The perceived gains are more likely coming from an increase intake roar that makes it seem like you have more power.
Aren't the gains from any of these cold air intake systems minimal at best, even when properly tuned? 10% power gains mentioned in this thread seem pretty high, most actual dyno tests I've seen are more in the range of 5-8 horsepower and maybe 1 mpg increase. I'd be willing to bet the average joe would not feel the seat of the pants difference of 7hp on a 6000lb vehicle. The perceived gains are more likely coming from an increase intake roar that makes it seem like you have more power.
__________________
Jim
Jim
Last edited by Bluejay; Nov 30, 2009 at 11:12 AM.
FX4Life, I'm going to "quibble" with one of your earlier posts. The OEM intake is NOT 3 inches. If you measure the diameter of the snorkel opening, it's only 2 inches. If you simply remove it, or replace it with a 3" diameter tube (the "Gotts Mod") you get a 3" intake.
Now, that may not seem like a big deal, but the cross-sectional area of a 2" intake is only 3.14159 square inches. While the cross-sectional area of a 3" intake is 7.069 square inches - 2.25 times as much! (Which means, of course, that you can potentially pull in more than twice as much air at a given time).
As long as the MAF sensor space is not altered, Bill Cohron has said the sensor there can measure this airflow accurately (and it won't change anyway except at high RPMs). The lean problem has been with some intakes that alter the sensor environment. I frankly don't know if the S&B intake falls into this category. And, I imagine that good R&D can design around this problem too.
- Jack
Now, that may not seem like a big deal, but the cross-sectional area of a 2" intake is only 3.14159 square inches. While the cross-sectional area of a 3" intake is 7.069 square inches - 2.25 times as much! (Which means, of course, that you can potentially pull in more than twice as much air at a given time).
As long as the MAF sensor space is not altered, Bill Cohron has said the sensor there can measure this airflow accurately (and it won't change anyway except at high RPMs). The lean problem has been with some intakes that alter the sensor environment. I frankly don't know if the S&B intake falls into this category. And, I imagine that good R&D can design around this problem too.
- Jack
As long as the MAF sensor space is not altered, Bill Cohron has said the sensor there can measure this airflow accurately (and it won't change anyway except at high RPMs). The lean problem has been with some intakes that alter the sensor environment. I frankly don't know if the S&B intake falls into this category. And, I imagine that good R&D can design around this problem too.
Just for example.. The 2005+ Mustangs use a MAF tube that is 83mm and than aftermarket MAF tubes are 90-95mm. JLT even makes a 110mm MAF tube for the 2010 Mustang!
FX4Life, I'm going to "quibble" with one of your earlier posts. The OEM intake is NOT 3 inches. If you measure the diameter of the snorkel opening, it's only 2 inches. If you simply remove it, or replace it with a 3" diameter tube (the "Gotts Mod") you get a 3" intake.
- Jack
- Jack
I was unaware how big the snorkel was, so thanks for that info
?
I ran the edge and S&B combo since the S&B intake came out, you will not run lean. I never had any issues from this setup what so ever; in fact S&B markets the intake as the intake that needs no tune! Just take the negative cable on the battery loose while your installing the intake so it can relearn.
I will second what Bluejay says, after going to custom tunes there is no comparison. You get the advantage of actually getting all you can from your intake/exhaust setup, added power, better driveability, etc, etc... The list is a long one, but in short they are well worth the $$$! With custom tunes you will be able tune it, but forget it you wont because its so much more fun to drive
I will second what Bluejay says, after going to custom tunes there is no comparison. You get the advantage of actually getting all you can from your intake/exhaust setup, added power, better driveability, etc, etc... The list is a long one, but in short they are well worth the $$$! With custom tunes you will be able tune it, but forget it you wont because its so much more fun to drive

please enlighten me how you can claim this will not run lean without providing air fuel numbers?, do you even know how lean the afr can be from the programmed mixture before the cel comes on? one final note-waiting for a cel to come on to tell you that you are running lean is playing russian roulette, you may want to do this with your engine, thats all fine and dandy, but don't give out advice without substantial proof that it is running right to other members.

I can also ask you the reverse question; How can you claim that every intake HAS to be custom tuned, because you know for a FACT that every intake makes a car/truck run lean? How can you explain all the people that run intakes for years with no tune and never have an issue? So... I guess your misleading members too then?
You don't like my argument, and I don't like yours; You think mine is invalid, and I think the same of yours.
I'm not sitting here asking you to provide proof that every intake causes a lean condition, and warrants a tune. I don't doubt that some do run lean, I also am pretty sure there are more intakes out there installed without a tune doing just fine.Am I saying that all intakes never cause a lean condition, no. Am I saying that you should not get custom tunes to go with your intake, no.
Am I saying I firmly believe that you don't have to get a tune just because you installed an intake, yes sir. Am I saying that a custom tune takes full advantage of your modifications, yes sir.
Last edited by FX4life; Dec 1, 2009 at 06:17 PM.
- Jack






