Bad Fords.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-17-2006, 09:56 PM
cyclone vampire's Avatar
Suspended
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: great white north
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bad Fords.....

what is the worst ford engine built?, what is the worst Ford you have ever owned? with all the best Ford Engine post's, just curious to see how life is on the dark side...
 
  #2  
Old 01-17-2006, 10:26 PM
zapster's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ....I could be anywhere....
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
anything in a tempo

...zap!
 
  #3  
Old 01-18-2006, 01:56 AM
Kool Aid's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 351 Cleveland is a 'rich man's' motor.

Another was the 427 Cross Bolt and the 427 Long Chain, both very expensive to buy parts for.

The Boss 429 was another one for deep pockets.

These are all probably considered good motors, but I never had enough money to do anything with them.

The 460 Lima hogged out to 500+ cubic inches is much better motor than any of those listed, and lot's less money.

In a Fox body Mustang coupe, they really work.

 
  #4  
Old 01-18-2006, 04:37 AM
Datafive0's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
early 4.2 V6's were a problem child...
Then you have the early 2.3L non-turbo 4 banger, the first 4.6L were crap and powerless. carb'd 1.9L 4 banger, I may catch crap.. the Flathead V8, was a problem child when it was first intrduced. Speaking of expensive to repair and buy parts for, the 428CJ.. Wow! Durable but god, were they expensive when something went shouth....

let us not forget the the "ford engines they did not make"
1.6L mazda used in the Capri's, the German 2000CC OHV toy motor used in the pinto.. well maintained it would last, but on a whole it was a unique experment.. 1.8L Mazda used in the early escort GT's (dies at 80K)

That is all I can recall off the top of my head, but I am sure the list will be added to..
 
  #5  
Old 01-18-2006, 08:18 AM
adrianspeeder's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dover AFB DE / Harrisburg PA
Posts: 4,970
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
The 230somthin cuin. V6 put in the F150 in the early 80s. I have only ever seen one in a junkyard.

Adrianspeeder
 
  #6  
Old 01-18-2006, 08:38 AM
MONGONGO's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: WHITE CLOUD KS
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TEMPO'S ! that's great.. When my wife and I were first married in 1992 we bought one and really thought we were styling.. It was even a 4wd/AWD tempo... Youd push a button like a 4wd truck.. That car was never right! Used oil from the word go. and depending on how the sun rose that day decided if it was gonna start or not. And on one day the compression check would be bad, and then it would show good!!!!!!!! Ill never forget that car Never!

Oh and the motor in an 1986 bronco 2.. that thing cost me thousands! And im not kidding.

We did not have it long mabey a year and then traded it for a special edition dynasty.. Now that was a nice car traded it off with 180 thousand miles. And have stayed with dodge Cars since. But she cant get me to change on my trucks.
 
  #7  
Old 01-18-2006, 09:48 AM
oldnnew's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clarence, NY
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zapster
anything in a tempo

...zap!

Hey buddy, them are fightin' words!

My 1994 Tempo with the 2.3 and 5-speed have almost 150,000 trouble free miles! I rely on the old car for 120 mile round trips to work every day, and it always delivers.
Stop baggin' on the old Tempo, it was a good car in it's day..... (of course, there are always exceptions!)
 
  #8  
Old 01-18-2006, 09:54 AM
Aaron_j's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anything in a Ford Escort, before Mazda started engineering them.

Most 2.3's
 
  #9  
Old 01-18-2006, 10:31 AM
ddellwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,823
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Fortunately, I haven't had a bad Ford yet. Now if we were talking GM's, then I'd invite you to pull up a bar stool and order a drink, cause we'd be here for awhile!
 
  #10  
Old 01-18-2006, 10:33 AM
ddellwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,823
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by MONGONGO
When my wife and I were first married in 1992 we bought one and really thought we were styling...
Now there are two words I've never used in conjunction with one another -- "Tempo" and "styling".....
 
  #11  
Old 01-18-2006, 10:57 AM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Posts: 26,015
Received 68 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by ddellwo
Now there are two words I've never used in conjunction with one another -- "Tempo" and "styling".....
My thoughts exactly, but then, ole Zap is kind of on a different cloud. I mean, he (his wife) has a restored 4 door Falcon. The man is just on a different cloud, but one that I respect a lot.
 
__________________
Jim
  #12  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:01 AM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Posts: 26,015
Received 68 Likes on 64 Posts
What was that square bodied Ford from the 80s called. That was one piece of crap. Of course, most cars from the 80s were a piece of crap. Oh yeah, just thought of it. The Granada.
 
__________________
Jim
  #13  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:07 AM
98Navi's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.3, turbo or not. Had an 88 (I think it was 88, I try to forget) Thunderchicken turbo. It ran like an abused stepchild while I drove it. SOld it to some chick for $1200. She drove it 32 miles, the waterpump crapped out, and she kept on truckin. It went another 8 miles before shutting down. Estimated cost for head repair if possible was $1480 (included R&R) New head was quoted some astronomical number. Only ford I have ever had that the motor crapped out on.

The only other one, maybe the 260 V8 in the early mustangs. Don't know if it had problems, but it didn't last long in the pony, 2 or 3 years at most.
 
  #14  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:26 AM
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Posts: 26,015
Received 68 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by 98Navi
2.3, turbo or not. Had an 88 (I think it was 88, I try to forget) Thunderchicken turbo. It ran like an abused stepchild while I drove it. SOld it to some chick for $1200. She drove it 32 miles, the waterpump crapped out, and she kept on truckin. It went another 8 miles before shutting down. Estimated cost for head repair if possible was $1480 (included R&R) New head was quoted some astronomical number. Only ford I have ever had that the motor crapped out on.

The only other one, maybe the 260 V8 in the early mustangs. Don't know if it had problems, but it didn't last long in the pony, 2 or 3 years at most.
The 260 was a very solid, reliable motor. It was in the Falcons and Fairlanes through 1964. It was only in the Early 64 1/2 Mustang. It was the predecessor of the 289. Shelby actually used the 260 in his first GT40.
 
__________________
Jim
  #15  
Old 01-18-2006, 11:38 AM
05SilverFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
352.....................leaked oil everywhere, rattled, clanked, and made a host of other noises, idled rough as he!!.
 


Quick Reply: Bad Fords.....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.