truth or myth?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #1  
NothingButFords's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Canada
truth or myth?

is it true that sc's wear down your engine fast?
or just a myth?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #2  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
its all how you drive and how its tuned
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #3  
ScottFF00's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
truth
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #4  
Raptor05121's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 7
From: Live Oak, FL
well a stock engine running normal sea level has 14.7 psi in the intake. now add a supercharger and increase it by 7-10 psi and like most people, increase fuel rate, etc etc. its not going to decrease engine wear!
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #5  
FX4 Matt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, Ma
Originally Posted by built54
its all how you drive and how its tuned
X2 if you have a good tune and drive like you have a brain you will get 100k+
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #6  
Smok][n's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
i agree that a properly tuned and well driven s/c motor can last a long time.

but all things being equal, i believe that more often than not a stock vehicle will have less problems in the long run..
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
Shinesintx's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas Tx
My lack of extensive physics, or engine knowledge...I would have to believe it would not last as long. Engine is working harder?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #8  
GerRod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Originally Posted by FX4 Matt
X2 if you have a good tune and drive like you have a brain you will get 100k+

X3. By the time I get to 100k, I'll probably turn it in for something else anyway.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #9  
stoffer's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,678
Likes: 82
From: missing Texas...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Muffl...em360023602750

the easiest way to "add power" to your truck
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #10  
CDB03STX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Bryant, AL
Originally Posted by GerRod
X3. By the time I get to 100k, I'll probably turn it in for something else anyway.
I just rolled over 100K. Motor is still riunning strong and not using any oil (other than blow-by). From day 1 of the install, I had already given the thought of another moter..tranny...rear-end, cause I knew I couldn't keep my foot out of it.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #11  
tj03f150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Spring/Woodlands, Tx.
ive read that turbos are easier on ur engine. of course if tuned right and all that
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 11:05 PM
  #12  
JMC's Avatar
JMC
Technical Article Contributor
25 Year Member
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 11
From: Windsor,Ontario,Canada
A turbo requires less HP to produce the same amount of power as a supercharger. The parasitic loss of a turbo is about 15ph. On a supercharger it is say at least 50 and some times 75. So to produce 400 crank Hp the turbo engine requires 415 where the supercharged engine could require 475. So the turbo requires less out of the engine. So will the blown engine last as long as a N/A engine? The triton's weak point are the rods and then the pistons. The Rods will not live long a levels exceeding 450 hp. If you do not tune right detonation will destroy the pistons. So stay under 450 crank Hp and tune it right and your blown engine should last as long as an N/A version.

JMC
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 12:03 AM
  #13  
NothingButFords's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Canada
i'm running a 302 windsor
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #14  
mrpositraction's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Originally Posted by JMC
A turbo requires less HP to produce the same amount of power as a supercharger. The parasitic loss of a turbo is about 15ph. On a supercharger it is say at least 50 and some times 75. So to produce 400 crank Hp the turbo engine requires 415 where the supercharged engine could require 475. So the turbo requires less out of the engine. So will the blown engine last as long as a N/A engine? The triton's weak point are the rods and then the pistons. The Rods will not live long a levels exceeding 450 hp. If you do not tune right detonation will destroy the pistons. So stay under 450 crank Hp and tune it right and your blown engine should last as long as an N/A version.

JMC
I've been told and read the ring lands will fold before the rods will break, either way it breaks, but just backwards from what you said. I have also heard the 450 hp is at the wheels, not the motor.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #15  
twmalonehunter's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Washington, PA
Originally Posted by mrpositraction
I've been told and read the ring lands will fold before the rods will break, either way it breaks, but just backwards from what you said. I have also heard the 450 hp is at the wheels, not the motor.

Well I hope it's 450 at the wheels! Can't imagine going to the trouble of a Roushcharger for 322 RWHP or less. I think there are plenty of guys running 380-400 RWHP with no problems. It seems like problems with the motor arise from some type of failure, like an injector, clogged fuel filter, bad tune, etc. My mechanic said to make sure and have a fuel pressure gauge and watch during hard acceleration. Fuel pressure drops I guess equals trouble.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.