Signature Size Change & Enforcement
PS - I own 2 Linux web servers of my own - hosting over 80 accounts with over 120 domains. I administer 8 copies of VB and 14 copies of photopost. Ive been volunteer mod here since 2000. Imagine my frustration at watching this unfold
Edit - I would expect that anything that is non standard ( non VB ) that breaks will not be fixed. WHat that means is that as time goes on in an effort to make things easy ( cheap ) for IB to support all the IB sites will eventually look VERY similar with similar features and functions
Last edited by Silver_2000; Jun 4, 2008 at 10:30 PM.
feckin a. prob 75% of all my sigs are 600x150. And i supply a ton of people here with sigs. <snip>.
Ill have to make a thread sometime this weekend so i can gather everyones sigs n resize em.
Ill have to make a thread sometime this weekend so i can gather everyones sigs n resize em.
Last edited by Rockpick; Jun 4, 2008 at 10:40 PM. Reason: Poor Language - rp
Thanks, Silver - did you receive my PM?
Last - on my forum, we are all volunteers, me included. The owner does give us little perks but no money changes hands. We enjoy ad-free browsing, for example. Regular members who don't want ads have to pay a subscription fee.
Last - on my forum, we are all volunteers, me included. The owner does give us little perks but no money changes hands. We enjoy ad-free browsing, for example. Regular members who don't want ads have to pay a subscription fee.

The Red Dog is a pretty neat place, we ate there several times when we lived up there. I hope your parents enjoyed their visit!
Last edited by wild-mtn-rose; Jun 5, 2008 at 02:07 AM. Reason: Removing my sig becasue I posted again right below!!
The first stage to implementation has gone in to place. Not totally sure if it's working or not but, I plan to experiment some when I have some time...
At this time, you are unable to add a signature that is greater than the 500x100 rule (by theory)... this has not/will not affect current signatures.
Also, WMR - it affects the .jpg or .bmp (or other) in the signature only right now... key words, right now. Text may be one of the next targets.
At this time, you are unable to add a signature that is greater than the 500x100 rule (by theory)... this has not/will not affect current signatures.
Also, WMR - it affects the .jpg or .bmp (or other) in the signature only right now... key words, right now. Text may be one of the next targets.
Last edited by wild-mtn-rose; Jun 5, 2008 at 02:06 AM. Reason: Removing my sig becasue I posted again right below!!
haha. i know a lot of people are gonna have to resize. i personally think 500x100 is a little small. with all the mods and money people have put into their rides, they should be able to show it off. its gonna be hard to do now with a sig where you can barely make out the shape and color of it. 
I for one applaud the sig size restriction, some of the outrageous ones on here make pages load really slow. I don't have dial-up anymore but when I did the huge sigs really sucked!!
Kudo's admin...
I know it's not going to happen. I'm not complaining. I'm just voicing my opinion. I still wish we could do 600 x 250 as a maximum signature size. My old signature was 550 x 150 and it was not big at all. I am curious though. Are moderators going to do something about the people who list out all of their mods in text? That's ridiculous.
I think this is bull crap. People like me, who have massive sigs, are very upset. I plan on leading a revolt. Nah, i kid, i think this has been a long time coming. I fully support you MODS!!! Its friday, u know what that means..... 





I know it's not going to happen. I'm not complaining. I'm just voicing my opinion. I still wish we could do 600 x 250 as a maximum signature size. My old signature was 550 x 150 and it was not big at all. I am curious though. Are moderators going to do something about the people who list out all of their mods in text? That's ridiculous.
the text controls work well - the image controls we are still playing with
RP,
See my post here
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=335824
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...34&postcount=3
This is a problem because no matter the size of the uploaded image the galleries here stretch it to 600 pixels wide.
See my post here
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=335824
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...34&postcount=3
This is a problem because no matter the size of the uploaded image the galleries here stretch it to 600 pixels wide.
Thanks. Not sure how to remedy this one...
It's looking more and more like the total PITA generated by this attempt at making the forums more user/surfer friendly is turning in to a nightmare....
The lack of support is starting to become blatently obvious to all of the members, isn't it?
It's looking more and more like the total PITA generated by this attempt at making the forums more user/surfer friendly is turning in to a nightmare....
The lack of support is starting to become blatently obvious to all of the members, isn't it?
Thanks. Not sure how to remedy this one...
It's looking more and more like the total PITA generated by this attempt at making the forums more user/surfer friendly is turning in to a nightmare....
The lack of support is starting to become blatently obvious to all of the members, isn't it?
It's looking more and more like the total PITA generated by this attempt at making the forums more user/surfer friendly is turning in to a nightmare....
The lack of support is starting to become blatently obvious to all of the members, isn't it?





