32V Twin Turbo 5.4L Project - Pics and Commentary
Very nice
Only issue I could see is if the MAF was in a location that has a bend or turbulence in front of it. Which could be the case if it's coming out of the intercooler. Might consider having it placed in the middle of that long straight pipe before the TB. Just something that could cause tuning problems in the future.
Only issue I could see is if the MAF was in a location that has a bend or turbulence in front of it. Which could be the case if it's coming out of the intercooler. Might consider having it placed in the middle of that long straight pipe before the TB. Just something that could cause tuning problems in the future.
Originally Posted by Casey02L
Very nice
Only issue I could see is if the MAF was in a location that has a bend or turbulence in front of it. Which could be the case if it's coming out of the intercooler. Might consider having it placed in the middle of that long straight pipe before the TB. Just something that could cause tuning problems in the future.
Only issue I could see is if the MAF was in a location that has a bend or turbulence in front of it. Which could be the case if it's coming out of the intercooler. Might consider having it placed in the middle of that long straight pipe before the TB. Just something that could cause tuning problems in the future.
Originally Posted by ShockTherapy
Thanks Casey. The MAF is actually about 6" away from the outlet of the IC through a straight pipe, so it shouldn't be a problem. They have done numerous blow through MAF setups that had the MAF as close if not a little closer than that to the IC and said it's not a problem. It only becomes an issue if you come right off of a bend into the MAF. I plan on totally doing away with the MAF (and converting to a speed density setup) before the end of the year, so I wanted it in a spot that wouldn't be seen once I take it out and put in a patch pipe.
Originally Posted by Casey02L
... I wanna be doing the same thing very soon, but with a big single turbol
T88 maybe ?I was telling the guys at the shop today I would be extremely happy with 650 RWHP at 10psi on pump gas. They laughed at me and said it shouldn't take that much boost to get 650 with my setup.
Here's to hoping/wishing they are right.
Originally Posted by Casey02L
That will work great if you have that much pipe in front of it. Just couldn't tell from the picture. I wanna be doing the same thing very soon, but with a big single turbol
dear god, i thought i was addicted. THIS MAN NEEDS URGENT TREATMENT!! im not even cloose to sure but that looks like a good $15,000 - 20,000 chillin under the hood. what kind of numbers do you think you'll get? 800hp / 900tq?
edit: id like to add that ive come to the conclusion that having enough torque to pull the skin of the earth measurably tighter when you stomp on the gas is ok.
edit: id like to add that ive come to the conclusion that having enough torque to pull the skin of the earth measurably tighter when you stomp on the gas is ok.
Last edited by Big Shooter; Aug 11, 2005 at 04:51 PM.
Originally Posted by Big Shooter
dear god, i thought i was addicted. THIS MAN NEEDS URGENT TREATMENT!! im not even cloose to sure but that looks like a good $15,000 - 20,000 chillin under the hood. what kind of numbers do you think you'll get? 800hp / 900tq?
edit: id like to add that ive come to the conclusion that having enough torque to pull the skin of the earth measurably tighter when you stomp on the gas is ok.
edit: id like to add that ive come to the conclusion that having enough torque to pull the skin of the earth measurably tighter when you stomp on the gas is ok.

Numbers? well....I will be VERY happy if I get 650RWHP at 10psi on pump gas, and 800 either on a pump gas or race tune about 16-17 psi. With my 60lb injectors I figure I will have to run a tune where I up the base fuel pressure about 10psi to hit 800.


