Lightning

Magnum Powers Blower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:01 AM
  #31  
blown318's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 0
From: Dyer, IN
Originally posted by l-menace
whining girlfriends --Hate
Whining kids in grocery store --Hate
Whining girlfriends in the mall -- HATE

Whining from a supercharger --> LOVE

 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:15 AM
  #32  
Suavy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 0
From: Bridgeport, MI
Casey02L,

Yes, like I said I had many people come up to me and say that thing sounds like a friggen jet!

Keep in mind I was spinning the chit out of it to using a 11.5" pulley and a 2 lb uper = 24 lbs of boost!

I guess thats why I blew both head gaskets!


Peace, Suavy
 

Last edited by Suavy; Sep 10, 2003 at 12:18 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:35 AM
  #33  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Originally posted by Suavy
Casey02L,

Yes, like I said I had many people come up to me and say that thing sounds like a friggen jet!

Keep in mind I was spinning the chit out of it to using a 11.5" pulley and a 2 lb uper = 24 lbs of boost!

I guess thats why I blew both head gaskets!


Peace, Suavy
Its safe to assume the head gaskets blew because of the insane temps that blower is making bro.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:39 AM
  #34  
Suavy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 0
From: Bridgeport, MI
No it was mostly the fact that the heads were under torqued


Peace, Suavy
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:42 AM
  #35  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
How did you come up to this conclusion?
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:43 AM
  #36  
eatoncharged's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
That is a ton of boost for a small roots supercharger Suavy, not doubting that but I will be the first to admit a screw would be beneficial at that RPM.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 01:25 AM
  #37  
Tim Skelton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Originally posted by captainoblivious
Are the production ones going to have a boost bypass?
Is there any reason at all why this would be eliminated?

Anyone?
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 01:33 AM
  #38  
eatoncharged's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
They are probaly not needed for test blowers. I was told they are for economy on the highway and so fourth. You don't waste time putting them in on something you are testing.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 01:38 AM
  #39  
promodlightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally posted by Suavy
No it was mostly the fact that the heads were under torqued


Peace, Suavy
who torqued your heads..... ......undertorquing is rampant here in Florida....
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 09:01 AM
  #40  
blown318's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,081
Likes: 0
From: Dyer, IN
Originally posted by promodlightning
who torqued your heads..... ......undertorquing is rampant here in Florida....
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #41  
Justin@JDM's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Scott,

Ford put the four supression holes to quiet the blowers down some. By doing that they did sacrifice some performance of the blower. The production one will have a fully working bypass system similar tot he stock Eatons. The pic I posted is that of one of the first prototype ones we got. It did not have new rotor packs in them. They were taken out of a stock Eaton that was pretty abused and had some flaking and rubbing.

Justin@JDM
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 10:30 AM
  #42  
rscoleman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Fl/Tenn
What were the heads torqued to? If the truck was detonating real bad it could've pushed the gaskets out, even if the heads were torqued correctly.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 11:57 AM
  #43  
Grey03's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: All over the US
I was under the impression that the noise supression holes are actually heat relief holes put there to allow some of the heat generated by the rotors to leave and not be trapped in the upper part of the blower, the somewhat quieter blower was a bonus.

ANTI RATTLE
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:02 PM
  #44  
easterisland's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
It seems to me that heat relief and less air being shoved through a single small triangular opening instead of one small triangular opening and two 1"x2" ports is the same thing.

thank you for your opinion
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #45  
captainoblivious's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally posted by Tim Skelton
Is there any reason at all why this would be eliminated?

Anyone?
Tim - if you remember, way back when there where pictures of the KB prototype which did not have the bypass. I was just curious if was going to be on the production version since that wasn't mentioned yet.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.