Warning To All...
Originally posted by Grey03
Who?
Ya'll keep believing what you want, but you are gettting warmer.
any other guesses?
Cool to see everyone getting into the hidden message thing thou
YSDKWIA AYNW
Ja
Who?
Ya'll keep believing what you want, but you are gettting warmer.
any other guesses?
Cool to see everyone getting into the hidden message thing thou
YSDKWIA AYNW
Ja
...
Originally posted by JeffsLightning
Did I say I was worried? Sounds like you having been hangin' round' Cyn... ...
Did I say I was worried? Sounds like you having been hangin' round' Cyn... ...
Originally posted by JeffsLightning
Did I say I was worried?
Sounds like you having been hangin' round' Cyn... ...
Did I say I was worried?
Sounds like you having been hangin' round' Cyn... ...
Roush/Ruslow vs. FRPP vs. Belltech
Originally posted by cyntaxx
Hehehe once I get my suspension goodies, we'll see who outhandles one another guys...
Roush/Ruslow vs. FRPP vs. Belltech
Hehehe once I get my suspension goodies, we'll see who outhandles one another guys...
Roush/Ruslow vs. FRPP vs. Belltech
I wont even spray.....
Originally posted by Brian Baskin
Lawsuits don't naturally have to suceed. Eventhough we sign a disclaimer disvolving tracks from liability, suits can be filed. They'll be thrown out in court, but they can be used to negatively publicise a track to hurt business or affect that track's status with NHRA/FFW/etc, by showing that it's run by a bunch of slack-jawed yokels. Even without a lawsuit, just the fact, or rumor, that a certain track is letting people in without true tech is enough to change the type of attendance. Serious racers may go elsewhere, worried that they'll be lined up against someone with a half-assed vehicle. And those with half-assed vehicles would find a new home there, knowing they can throw a car together and not get hassled over it. So there are still many negative aspects that can still result from the incident.
Lawsuits don't naturally have to suceed. Eventhough we sign a disclaimer disvolving tracks from liability, suits can be filed. They'll be thrown out in court, but they can be used to negatively publicise a track to hurt business or affect that track's status with NHRA/FFW/etc, by showing that it's run by a bunch of slack-jawed yokels. Even without a lawsuit, just the fact, or rumor, that a certain track is letting people in without true tech is enough to change the type of attendance. Serious racers may go elsewhere, worried that they'll be lined up against someone with a half-assed vehicle. And those with half-assed vehicles would find a new home there, knowing they can throw a car together and not get hassled over it. So there are still many negative aspects that can still result from the incident.
And some have been able to get past the release for "unforeseen conditions" (such as poor condition of the racing surface, improper barrier construction, etc). The theory is that you agreed to take on only those risks which you reasonably would know about, not hidden ones. But in general, a race track release is very effective. Even if some dumbass files a suit, on a pure issue of law such as this, it would not take long to prevail on a motion -- maybe even before having to answer and appear.



..