The Moon........
#46
#48
There are so many benefits that have been reaped from space exploration.. Its all around everyone who lives a modern life.. Pushing the limits of whats possible is what humans do. If it were not in our nature to do that we would still be living in caves. Our ancestors explored and settled the world. It up to us and our descendants to do the same thing in the galaxy and the universe in general..
#52
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velcro
Space exploration hadn't begun then.
Popular misconception, tho. Some think the Vulcans gave it to us.
The space program found practical uses for it.
#53
I think the true reason we have not been back is we were driven off by The Clangers & The Soup Dragon!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej3d3...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej3d3...eature=related
#56
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capricorn_One
Sez it's a Mars landing inspired by those who don't believe in space travel.
Barb Streisand's husband stars in it. O.J., too.
Sez it's a Mars landing inspired by those who don't believe in space travel.
Barb Streisand's husband stars in it. O.J., too.
Last edited by High-ster; 09-04-2011 at 03:23 PM.
#57
Doesn't anyone remember that in 1567, Galileo transported the moon to Alpha Centuari using da Vinci's forgotten "laser" technology? That is why Mona Lisa is a painting instead of a laser etching--no one was "rad" enough to appreciate lasers at the time.
Galileo replaced the moon with a holographic image, also first found in Leo's notebooks...
Galileo replaced the moon with a holographic image, also first found in Leo's notebooks...
#58
1.) None of our current telescopes is powerful enough to detect them. Even in an image from the Hubble telescope, they are smaller than a single pixel. Hubble can only distinguish things on the moon that are more than 60 meters wide. For a telescope powerful enough to detect the SPECK of the landing craft, the lens would have to be 18 miles long.
The moon is about 235,000 miles away, or about 800-1000 times as far as those satellite photos. The lunar lander chassis is well under two car-lengths long -- so there's no way you're going to be able to spot objects that size from as far away as the moon is. And the other stuff they left there is much smaller than the chassis.
#59