Ala. town hit by tornadoes bans FEMA trailers
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Ala. town hit by tornadoes bans FEMA trailers
CORDOVA, Ala. – James Ruston's house was knocked off its foundation by tornadoes that barreled through town last month and is still uninhabitable. He thought help had finally arrived when a truck pulled up to his property with a mobile home from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Then he got the call: Single-wide mobile homes, like the FEMA one, are illegal in the city of Cordova.
The city's refusal to let homeless residents occupy temporary housing provided by FEMA has sparked outrage in this central Alabama town of 2,000, with angry citizens filling a meeting last week and circulating petitions to remove the man many blame for the decision, Mayor Jack Scott.
Ruston and many others view the city's decision as heartless, a sign that leaders don't care that some people are barely surviving in the rubble of a blue-collar town.
"People have to live somewhere. What's it matter if it's in a trailer?" asked Felicia Boston, standing on the debris-strewn lot where a friend has lived in a tent since a tornado destroyed his home on April 27.
Scott has heard all the complaints, and he isn't apologizing. He said he doesn't want run-down mobile homes parked all over town years from now.
"I don't feel guilty," he said. "I can look anyone in the eye."
Located about 35 miles northwest of Birmingham, Cordova was hit by a pair of powerful tornadoes on April 27, the day twisters killed more than 300 people across the Southeast. Officials say 238 died in Alabama, the highest death toll for any state in a spring of violent weather.
An EF-3 twister with winds of at least 140 mph slammed into the town around 5:30 a.m., knocking out power and damaging numerous buildings. An EF-4 with winds around 170 mph struck about 12 hours later, killing four people and cutting a path of destruction a half-mile wide through town.
Scores of homes, businesses and city buildings were destroyed or damaged by the time the winds died down. Nearly every red-brick storefront was whacked along Main Street, which is now deserted and blocked by a chain-link fence.
Residents whose homes were destroyed assumed they would be able to live in one of the hundreds of long, skinny mobile homes that FEMA is providing as temporary housing for tornado victims. After all, the Cordova Police Department, a pharmacy, a bank and City Hall all have moved into similar trailers since the storm.
But the city enacted a law three years ago that bans the type of mobile homes provided by FEMA, called single-wide trailers. Older single-wide mobile homes were grandfathered in under the law and double-wide mobile homes are still allowed, Scott said, but new single-wides aren't allowed and a tornado isn't any reason to change the law, even temporarily.
The city's stance prompted an outcry that's not getting any quieter, especially with other cities with similar laws granting waivers. About 200 people attended a community meeting last night where some tried to shout down Scott.
"There are trailers all over here but (Scott) wants to clean all the trash out. He doesn't like lower-class people," said Harvey Hastings.
The cotton mill, brick plant and coal mine that once made Cordova prosperous shut down years ago, but native Tony Tidwell said leaders seem to believe residents are flush with cash and can afford to build big, new houses to replace the mobile homes and small frame homes that twisters blew away.
"Let the people have a place to live," he said. To make matters worse, he said, the city is imposing a mean double standard when it refuses to let residents live in FEMA trailers but is using a nearly identical structure for police headquarters.
Scott said the city can use small trailers because it's for the common good.
"It's temporary and we know it's temporary," said the mayor. "We're trying to provide services for everyone."
Storm victims are supposed to live in FEMA housing for no longer than 18 months after a disaster, yet about 260 campers are still occupied by survivors of hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the Gulf Coast last more than five years after those storms. The same thing could happen in Cordova if the city bends it rules to help tornado victims, Scott said.
Officials with FEMA have said it's a local issue and they remain ready to offer help to storm victims.
"We have several options available, and work with each community, to provide the best alternative possible for those who need housing assistance," Michael Byrne, FEMA's federal coordinating officer for Alabama, said in a statement. "We stand ready to help."
Ruston said he doesn't want to live in a mobile home forever, and he didn't want to leave Cordova to move in with a relative after his FEMA trailer was turned away.
Now, he said, it might not be worth going back.
"If we're going to have a mayor like that I'll just go elsewhere," he said.
Then he got the call: Single-wide mobile homes, like the FEMA one, are illegal in the city of Cordova.
The city's refusal to let homeless residents occupy temporary housing provided by FEMA has sparked outrage in this central Alabama town of 2,000, with angry citizens filling a meeting last week and circulating petitions to remove the man many blame for the decision, Mayor Jack Scott.
Ruston and many others view the city's decision as heartless, a sign that leaders don't care that some people are barely surviving in the rubble of a blue-collar town.
"People have to live somewhere. What's it matter if it's in a trailer?" asked Felicia Boston, standing on the debris-strewn lot where a friend has lived in a tent since a tornado destroyed his home on April 27.
Scott has heard all the complaints, and he isn't apologizing. He said he doesn't want run-down mobile homes parked all over town years from now.
"I don't feel guilty," he said. "I can look anyone in the eye."
Located about 35 miles northwest of Birmingham, Cordova was hit by a pair of powerful tornadoes on April 27, the day twisters killed more than 300 people across the Southeast. Officials say 238 died in Alabama, the highest death toll for any state in a spring of violent weather.
An EF-3 twister with winds of at least 140 mph slammed into the town around 5:30 a.m., knocking out power and damaging numerous buildings. An EF-4 with winds around 170 mph struck about 12 hours later, killing four people and cutting a path of destruction a half-mile wide through town.
Scores of homes, businesses and city buildings were destroyed or damaged by the time the winds died down. Nearly every red-brick storefront was whacked along Main Street, which is now deserted and blocked by a chain-link fence.
Residents whose homes were destroyed assumed they would be able to live in one of the hundreds of long, skinny mobile homes that FEMA is providing as temporary housing for tornado victims. After all, the Cordova Police Department, a pharmacy, a bank and City Hall all have moved into similar trailers since the storm.
But the city enacted a law three years ago that bans the type of mobile homes provided by FEMA, called single-wide trailers. Older single-wide mobile homes were grandfathered in under the law and double-wide mobile homes are still allowed, Scott said, but new single-wides aren't allowed and a tornado isn't any reason to change the law, even temporarily.
The city's stance prompted an outcry that's not getting any quieter, especially with other cities with similar laws granting waivers. About 200 people attended a community meeting last night where some tried to shout down Scott.
"There are trailers all over here but (Scott) wants to clean all the trash out. He doesn't like lower-class people," said Harvey Hastings.
The cotton mill, brick plant and coal mine that once made Cordova prosperous shut down years ago, but native Tony Tidwell said leaders seem to believe residents are flush with cash and can afford to build big, new houses to replace the mobile homes and small frame homes that twisters blew away.
"Let the people have a place to live," he said. To make matters worse, he said, the city is imposing a mean double standard when it refuses to let residents live in FEMA trailers but is using a nearly identical structure for police headquarters.
Scott said the city can use small trailers because it's for the common good.
"It's temporary and we know it's temporary," said the mayor. "We're trying to provide services for everyone."
Storm victims are supposed to live in FEMA housing for no longer than 18 months after a disaster, yet about 260 campers are still occupied by survivors of hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the Gulf Coast last more than five years after those storms. The same thing could happen in Cordova if the city bends it rules to help tornado victims, Scott said.
Officials with FEMA have said it's a local issue and they remain ready to offer help to storm victims.
"We have several options available, and work with each community, to provide the best alternative possible for those who need housing assistance," Michael Byrne, FEMA's federal coordinating officer for Alabama, said in a statement. "We stand ready to help."
Ruston said he doesn't want to live in a mobile home forever, and he didn't want to leave Cordova to move in with a relative after his FEMA trailer was turned away.
Now, he said, it might not be worth going back.
"If we're going to have a mayor like that I'll just go elsewhere," he said.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Decatur,AL
Cordova's about an hour south of me. Yeah, Mr. Scott isn't making any fans right now. I'm sure it won't be to long before he's run out of town. The residents are taking it pretty dang seriously, I saw it on Fox News yesterday.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Wow, that makes no sence, just let people be homeless?
I can see where the motor homes might make it look runned down, but its temporary housing! after a tornado! who cares what it looks like?!
I can see where the motor homes might make it look runned down, but its temporary housing! after a tornado! who cares what it looks like?!
Last edited by blu3expy; Jun 1, 2011 at 09:59 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
Trending Topics
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
When it comes down to it, does it really matter ?
I know you love to take any opportunity to clobber a "republican" over the head for anything.
Why are you the one to start the class warfare in this thread ?
I know, I know that is a republican thing, which by extrapolation means you cannot be accused of doing it ....
I had not even thought of this as part of what the DB is doing, so I just went and looked. Bunch of supposition in posts by people ( no clue if they even live in the town, let alone actually know ) as to which party affiliation he is.
You can find assumptions on both sides of party affiliation question, which leads me to believe that the ones that claim he is a dem are by republicans, and vice versa. I did find one claim : "The municipal elections in Alabama are non-partisan" ?? got me if this means they really do not have a party affiliation or if they just do not announce it.
I know the city I live in is the same way, the campaigns do not list any party affiliation. The guy I supported I have not clue which side he is on, I just supported him in the election.
This how all elections should run, but that would trash voter turn out - most people would have no clue who to vote for.
In other words the polarization ( that you display in your post ) that is furthered ( created by ? ) by the MSM is working great.
I know you love to take any opportunity to clobber a "republican" over the head for anything.
Why are you the one to start the class warfare in this thread ?
I know, I know that is a republican thing, which by extrapolation means you cannot be accused of doing it ....
I had not even thought of this as part of what the DB is doing, so I just went and looked. Bunch of supposition in posts by people ( no clue if they even live in the town, let alone actually know ) as to which party affiliation he is.
You can find assumptions on both sides of party affiliation question, which leads me to believe that the ones that claim he is a dem are by republicans, and vice versa. I did find one claim : "The municipal elections in Alabama are non-partisan" ?? got me if this means they really do not have a party affiliation or if they just do not announce it.
I know the city I live in is the same way, the campaigns do not list any party affiliation. The guy I supported I have not clue which side he is on, I just supported him in the election.
This how all elections should run, but that would trash voter turn out - most people would have no clue who to vote for.
In other words the polarization ( that you display in your post ) that is furthered ( created by ? ) by the MSM is working great.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
............this is a pointless law, to me he just wants the town to not look runned down, but its temporary housing! for people who lost their home. Talk about giving help to the people who need it, well they need it and they are not getting it because of a law that makes no sence other then to make the town not look like its runned down, when its destroyed by a tornado. wow.
Last edited by blu3expy; Jun 2, 2011 at 07:49 PM.
