Over 50 Years Old? Have Your PSA Checked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2011 | 06:12 PM
  #1  
High-ster's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Danksville, near Budsburg USA
Over 50 Years Old? Have Your PSA Checked

Pal of mine just turned 50 and developed a pain in his groin area.

He finally went to see the Dr. who informed him he has Stage 4, Prostate Cancer.

Although being a successful Contractor, for some reason, he neglected his health by not having regular check-ups.

One Dr. he was seeing told him to make his final arrangements.

Another Dr. did surgery by implanting some radioactive seeds around and in his prostate gland. He was still told to prepare himself and his family for the imminent.

This is the second one of my friends that have been diagnosed with cancer, one of them being my BEST pal, who passed on a year ago from liver cancer.

Anyhow guys, having your PSA checked is such a simple thing and could possibly save your life and the ones who love you a lot of heartache.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 06:29 PM
  #2  
rac03's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: central california coast
Sorry to hear the bad news about your friends. Good reminder, thanks. I had the ole Colonoscopy last year also, no problem.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #3  
cphilip's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 0
From: Clemson SC US of A
Thanks for the reminder. Been having the check up at least once a year for about four years now. Also started doing so when I turned 50. And besides a PSA you should have more direct exam done if you have any others symptoms and reason to do so. I haven't had any reason to go further and PSA' are great for me so far. I have been hearing a lot lately that they are even recommending starting at 45.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2011 | 01:18 PM
  #4  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
The psa is means something but it is not that good by itself. I went to a urologist who likes to do biopsies if you have any reading. He said he had found aggressive cancers in prostates when the psa was 2.5. I've read that 50% of men who had their prostates removed were impotent. So, what to do is not that clear cut.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2011 | 07:37 PM
  #5  
darkstar_420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
i hear you should start getting your prostate checked regularly when you hit about 30 years old
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 12:36 AM
  #6  
RSchnier's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
FWIW...My Doc is not a huge fan of the PSA test by itself; he uses it but says it yields false-positive too often to be accurate alone, and an enlarged prostate can false-positive the test without anything serious actually involved. So he does the, ahem, "digital" exam in addition to the PSA, which allows better interpretation of the PSA numbers because he can take the size of the prostate into account against the PSA measurement.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 03:06 AM
  #7  
Agent47's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Sorry to hear about yr pals,losing someone like that is not good.
I would expect that my doc will encourage me to have things checked but I doubt it will go any further. My reasoning is that I very much doubt if I could handle the prep. I have a very strong gagg reflex which makes it pretty difficult to drink nasty tasting things. Sometimes just the look or smell of somethings is enough, so I guess for me its not going to happen.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 10:44 AM
  #8  
cphilip's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 0
From: Clemson SC US of A
Originally Posted by RSchnier
FWIW...My Doc is not a huge fan of the PSA test by itself; he uses it but says it yields false-positive too often to be accurate alone, and an enlarged prostate can false-positive the test without anything serious actually involved. So he does the, ahem, "digital" exam in addition to the PSA, which allows better interpretation of the PSA numbers because he can take the size of the prostate into account against the PSA measurement.
While it is true that an enlarged prostate can show an elevated PSA and it not be cancerous. It at least tells someone to then do the digital exam. What it does do is detects small growths BEFORE they can be felt on a digital. So... by itself it may only lead to further examination to determine the cause of elevated readings.... but to skip it would be a mistake. Most doctors will warn you not to get alarmed if your readings are going up. But then again... you can't skip it either. You need to use it to know to look more closely with other means.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 12:48 PM
  #9  
Agent47's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
When the time come I will leave my doctor in no doubt exactly where he can stick his finger & it won't be anywhere near me!!!
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
RSchnier's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, MN
Originally Posted by Agent47
When the time come I will leave my doctor in no doubt exactly where he can stick his finger & it won't be anywhere near me!!!
Well, suit yourself. You maaay want to consider though, whether 5 seconds of minor discomfort (and it really is minor) is worth it to perhaps head off a lifetime of a whole lot more suffering than that.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 10:34 PM
  #11  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
My doc does the lovely exam and blood testing. Is that enough? I don't know.
 

Last edited by Super FX4; May 8, 2011 at 11:17 PM.
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 11:32 PM
  #12  
Flagship's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Big Sky Country, Montana
My doctor keeps getting on me to take this test. But, when I ask him about the number of false positives, he admits there are plenty. Have you any idea what you go through waiting for the results of some other test between the time your PSA says you have the C word, and the time you find out you don't?

I went through a bout of cancer, had hunks of me cut out, the kemo thing, the months of centering my whole life around my bad body parts. Enough! I choose to live joyously and not at the doctors office. When my time comes, it comes.

YMMV
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 04:12 AM
  #13  
code58's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 2
From: So. Cal.
Originally Posted by Agent47
When the time come I will leave my doctor in no doubt exactly where he can stick his finger & it won't be anywhere near me!!!
Wanta live??? Nobody (straight) wants that, but hear me out. I had a PSA of 2.4, very normal. I was fortunate to have a GOOD Dr. (young) who hadn't slept through class. He did a digital (not because of PSA, or being gay, or symptoms), just because he was a good DR. He found a fairly good sized mass and sent me for biopsies. For those of you who know what Gleason Score is, it was Gleason 6 and 7! That is borderline no return! Being healthy and active, and with a lot of prayer and an EXCELLENT surgeon, I chose that route. That was almost 15 years ago and I can guarantee you, with a PSA of 2.4 and NO symptoms, had I not done what no man wants to do (bend over) and let him put "do the probe", I WOULD NOT be here today!

By the way, I have an EXCELLENT female Dr. who has had her finger up there and she has enough sense to lay you on your side on the table and I can guarantee you it's MUCH easier. Wanta live? It's your choice, and I know those who've made the wrong one, and enjoyed a nice funeral.
I asked the surgeon who did my surgery (excellent outcome, most that do not just don't have the right surgeon) how long he thought I likely had the cancer and he said maybe as long as 10 years!!! (Re-read above!)
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #14  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
I've debated entering this thread, but code, your post pushed me over the line.

Two years ago my PSA was 2.4. Last year it was suddenly 3.4. After a second PSA that was also in the mid 3s, I elected to have a biopsy. I'm a bit more lucky than code was. My Gleason score was in the 5s on half of the samples. As a result, I had several choices:
1. Continued monitoring - PSAs 4 times per year followed by another biopsy at the end of summer.
2. Surgury - he recommended this only if I was so worried I could not sleep at night.
3. Radiation - The problem with this is that radiated tissue does not really behave like ordinary tissue anymore and it increases your chance of rectal cancer as well as a 4 times risk of bladder cancer.
4. Freezing - He said there is no long term data on this yet, so he couldn't really recommend it. (I wonder how the hell they freeze your prostate?)
5. Reduce testosterone - unfortunately, this increases your risk of heart attack and stroke.
I asked about chemo, but he said that was really only for end-stage, when you wanted to suffer through a month or so longer.

I've opted for the continued monitoring. So far, things seem fairly "stable", but we'll see on my next visit to the urologist.

I asked about symptoms - He said there are none usually, until you start having chronic backache, which means the cancer is attacking your spine (sounds a lovely way to die, doesn't it)?

Before having the biopsy, I tried to gather as much information as possible. Almost everything I found made a biopsy sound horrible and the procedure sound dangerous. But, nothing I found gave any meaningful alternative. So, the biopsy, while "uncomfortable" was certainly not "painful" and there were no lasting ill effects. I'm glad I had it and though I'm not looking forward to the next one, will have that one too.

Bottom line, in my opinion - If you want to die horribly, don't have your PSA checked and don't submit to the rectal exam. Prostate cancer effects a VERY large number of men as they age (I'm 70 - as Bluejay says, "Really old.") I plan to live for many more years and intend to continue being actively engaged in physical (and mental) activity while doing so.

- Jack
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2011 | 03:25 AM
  #15  
code58's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 2
From: So. Cal.
Jack, I read almost around the clock (when I wasn't working) from the time I got the biopsy report with the Gleason 6 and 7 till I had the surgery. I chose 6 mo. of hormonal deprivation before surgery to downsize the tumors as much as possible (NOT FUN!). My wife is an RN so I got ALL the technical stuff I could get my hands on (NOT brochures!) and the 6 mo. HD gave me time to think. I chose surgery because that's the ONLY way they could do a "slide" study of the whole gland. I have seen all the slides, gone over and explained by a Pathologist. I have seen quite a few funerals (some had surgery, some not) and most were diagnosed AFTER me. The gland size is an important factor in eventual outcome. The more normal size, the better (mine was 2 gram under normal) and the larger, the worse. HUGE (60-85 grams IS NOT GOOD!) My youngest brother (5 years younger) was diagnosed 1 mo. after I was. It is a disease that has NEVER read the rule book, matter of fact I don't think one exists! Jack, at 70, your chances improve all the time, I was quite a bit younger when diagnosed. But it is still VERY important that you keep on top of it. With a Gleason of 5 (should be a second #, rarely ever both the same #) it would be worth your time to do some current studying on the disease. I was a Medic when in the service, my wife spent a career in nursing and I have one of the best Dr.'s I've ever known and I still am not foolish enough to say "well my Dr. said", and I mean it! She KNOWS I'm going to research whatever she tells me, and has no problem with that.

BTW, seed implants have come a LOOOONG way since I was diagnosed, and my personal opinion is it is possibly the best way yo go for a LOT of men TODAY. There are asterisks beside that, but the advances have been striking. TEMPORARY seeds are also a very good consideration.
 

Last edited by code58; May 10, 2011 at 03:31 AM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 AM.