B.C. couple shut down B&B after gay rights complaint
Here's more things to think on: What about the animal kingdom? Animals in the wild that are gay are even more rare than in the human race. If it is decided prenatally, why isn't the percentage closer to 50%, or even better, 25%?
In truth, neither are anywhere near either rate.
In truth, neither are anywhere near either rate.
Your words, not mine. Please read post #94
But in 20 years,given the slippery slope we are on you may very well be in the minority. What gives you the right or authority to determine what is right for some one else? All the arguements you are making could be used against you in that scenario. You are trying to equate things that are not equal in the name of special rights for a given group of people, where is the consideration for the old couple. In your line of thinking it just isn't there, only the pitch fork and torches approach. Remember you are the one who said that an example should be made of them. Where is the tolerance you speak of for this couple? It isn't there either. Somehow they don't fit your view of what tolerance is, so your answer is burn them at the stake.
Here is a thought, maybe, just maybe they made a mistake and didn't understand what they were opening themselves up to. For this they should be punished? Or how about maybe this gay couple was "shopping" for a law suit (that happens), and where is their tolerence of others?
I guess the point that I'm trying to get you to see is this is just another case of militant gay poor me and you fell for it hook, line, and sinker.
But in 20 years,given the slippery slope we are on you may very well be in the minority. What gives you the right or authority to determine what is right for some one else? All the arguements you are making could be used against you in that scenario. You are trying to equate things that are not equal in the name of special rights for a given group of people, where is the consideration for the old couple. In your line of thinking it just isn't there, only the pitch fork and torches approach. Remember you are the one who said that an example should be made of them. Where is the tolerance you speak of for this couple? It isn't there either. Somehow they don't fit your view of what tolerance is, so your answer is burn them at the stake.
Here is a thought, maybe, just maybe they made a mistake and didn't understand what they were opening themselves up to. For this they should be punished? Or how about maybe this gay couple was "shopping" for a law suit (that happens), and where is their tolerence of others?
I guess the point that I'm trying to get you to see is this is just another case of militant gay poor me and you fell for it hook, line, and sinker.
I doubt these people are some hate mongers rather they are probably some old couple brought up with old fashioned thoughts of how the world should be and I get that. I'm not saying to take their home away and lock them in prison for 30 years of hard labor.
At the same rate, I don't want to create a legal precedent that allows people to use "my home" as a way to deny services to those different than them. I don't want to say, well they closed it so it's no biggie.
The reality is though, if you open a business you better know what you are getting into. Ignorance is not usually a valid defense.
It is no more learned than for me to be hetorexual. Nobody told me to like women, I just knew it intrininctly.(sp)
There arnt any more gay people now than before, they are only coming put of the closet more because they were terrified before because of certain closed minded people.
I would hate to be gay in Texas, who the heck is going to come out there? Just because they don't admit their gayness doesnt mean they don't exist.
From what I've read I think the % of gay people would be closer to 3-5%, but it's hard to know for sure, lots of fear still from people.
The reality is though, if you open a business you better know what you are getting into. Ignorance is not usually a valid defense.
Here's more things to think on: What about the animal kingdom? Animals in the wild that are gay are even more rare than in the human race. If it is decided prenatally, why isn't the percentage closer to 50%, or even better, 25%?
In truth, neither are anywhere near either rate.
In truth, neither are anywhere near either rate.
Here's more things to think on: What about the animal kingdom? Animals in the wild that are gay are even more rare than in the human race. If it is decided prenatally, why isn't the percentage closer to 50%, or even better, 25%?
In truth, neither are anywhere near either rate.
In truth, neither are anywhere near either rate.
Why aren't 25% of all people born with red hair? Why don't 25% have Down Syndrome?
Do I think every gay person was "born" that way? No. Is every guy that is heterosexual a solid heterosexual...no.
That said, a lot of people are afraid of anyone not like them and act out in prejudice acts and hatred.
More oppression and hatred has been driven by religion than any other reason. Does that mean to abandon religion, no but people miss the point of it being about love and make it a reason to feel morally superior and spread hate!
Habibi
Senior Member
From what I've read I think the % of gay people would be closer to 3-5%, but it's hard to know for sure, lots of fear still from people.
Senior Member
From what I've read I think the % of gay people would be closer to 3-5%, but it's hard to know for sure, lots of fear still from people.
that is what makes this stuff even more goofy. Think about it 95-97% are asked to bend over backwards for 3-5%, and you can't call that "special" rights?
Look at our very own Bucky, here's a guy who most days of the week is as heterosexual as the next guy, but get a few beers into him and invite his hunting buddies over for a "Hot Tub" party, and all of a sudden, all hell breaks loose, and Bucky ventures over to the 'other side' for a few special treats which he reserves for special occassions.
Does that make him gay? It's hard to tell, that why I like to think of him as only half a ***.

Let's say there's 300 million people in the USA and let's pretend the real rate is only 2%, that's still 6 million people. That's an awful lot of people to be trampling on, but seriously, nobody is asking anyone to bend over, just treat people fairly and don't discriminate, it's not really a lot to ask.
Let's say there's 300 million people in the USA and let's pretend the real rate is only 2%, that's still 6 million people. That's an awful lot of people to be trampling on, but seriously, nobody is asking anyone to bend over, just treat people fairly and don't discriminate, it's not really a lot to ask.
I'm not the least bit gay and have no intentions of going out and giving gay folks a hard time. I do have a problem with gays pushing their beliefs on me. If all they want it to live and be left alone I am fine with that. What they do in their bedrooms isn't my business. When they take it out of their bedroom and start waving it around on Main St. then they have made it my business. This is the problem most people have with the gay movement.
I think this is the misconception that's fueling some of these problems.
The gays just want to be able to live their life the same as you and me and not be discriminated against. They don;t want some 80 year old curmudgion from Texas telling them that they should just "restrain themselves from having sex" (not mentioning any names)
It really is as simple as that.
Kmacs example about the Hindi working at Burger King was a spot on example.
The Hindi cant eat aninals because its against his religion, but applies for a job at burger king.
He can't very well say to Burger King "Well, my religion forbids me from handling cows for consumption, so please stop selling it"
Burger King is still offering him the job, it's not BK's fault the guy's religion goes against working there.
The nice old couple running the B&B were never asked to change their religious beliefs but they broke the law when they refused to rent them a room at their business (which happens to be where they live) but the business takes precident. It's not like the gay couple will be having their relations in front of the old couple.
On the same token, they couldve just lied and said they were brothers, and nobody was the wiser, they couodve done their business behind closed doors and nobody wouldve been the wiser.
The old couple shoulve never asked them "Are you guy", personally, its nobodys business.
My personal belief is the gay couple shoudve just went 'oh well, let's look elsewhere' and moved on, but they didnt and now they have every right to go after them for discrimination.
Would I have done it? No, but it's still their right under the Canadian legal system, no different than if they were disciminated for the colour of their skin.
Just be gay and enjoy your equal rights but you dont have to parade it around in front of peoples noses.
I'm in total agreement.



