I never liked this car.

Old Dec 21, 2010 | 01:06 AM
  #31  
RhondaRocks's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Knoxvegas TN
Originally Posted by dirt bike dave
The new ones look OK.

Not as good as the original, IMO.

I have to agree I love the old ones. I wouldn't sneeze at either one, I'd drive either like I stole it.
Rhonda
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 02:37 AM
  #32  
birddog_61's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Graham TX
Supposedly the 2011 will hang with an m3 on a road course, that is pretty damn good for a live axel.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 07:48 AM
  #33  
shifty219's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Sault,ontario,CaNaDa
As far as Im concerned, the Mustang was never ment to be a "sports" car, its a muscle car... Porsche and Ferrari, those are "sports" cars
Remember IMO
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #34  
BREWDUDE's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Kobi..I've always loved the Mustang. Have owned 4 of them so far. I would give my left arm for a GT500 or better yet, the Boss 302.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muRC7WJHgmA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOwSPccbzl4&NR=1

I cant wait to see the Boss up against the M3
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 09:53 AM
  #35  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
Originally Posted by kobiashi
Well, you have now..


Originally Posted by kobiashi
Thanks for allowing me my opinion. You're talking about relative quality vs. older Ford vehicles. That's not exactly the highest standard to compare against. Better than something that wasn't all that good to begin with doesn't say much.
First, your welcome, and thanks for letting me have mine too! It does say alot about how far Ford has come over the past few years compared to were it was, even in 2007. Ford is making great strides.

Originally Posted by kobiashi
Compared to Porsches, Audis, et al. it's nothing to write home about. (It is better that the crap interior of a Corvette however, so it has that going for it.) Compared to my Lexus, the interior is crap. It all depends on your point of view.
So your comparing a Fords interior to Lexus and Porsche? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the GT500s interior isnt as nice as a Mercedes or Bentley either. Its a Ford, which isn't a luxury brand to begin with so compare apples to apples. Compare it to a Camaro SS and a Challenger SRT8.

Originally Posted by kobiashi
Compared to other sports cars that have sophisticated suspensions, the GT500 is seriously lacking.
The GT does about equal to the M3:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html

I am sure the GT500 isn't much worse.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #36  
Carlsson3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
I certainly ain't no Chevy fan boy, but the Shelby GT500 is a **** poor performer for the money.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIPBP-9TUnQ
 

Last edited by Carlsson3; Dec 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #37  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
A Corvette is a sports car and not really directly comparable. Two different types of rides, ones a sports car in every true sense of the word and the other is a good ole fahion muscle car
 

Last edited by harleydude78; Dec 21, 2010 at 11:40 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 11:38 AM
  #38  
1fast4.6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, Missouri
Originally Posted by Carlsson3
I certainly ain't no Chevy fan boy, but the Shelby GT500 is a **** poor performer for the money.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIPBP-9TUnQ


We have a winner!!!

The Z06 is a beast
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #39  
kobiashi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in the EU
Originally Posted by harleydude78
It does say alot about how far Ford has come over the past few years compared to were it was, even in 2007. Ford is making great strides.
You get no argument from me. I am in total agreement with you on this point. I had a 2000 Lightning and then a 2002 Lightning. Now those were CRAP interiors. Tap on the dashboard and you were tapping on plastic that had the same consistency and thickness of the type of plastic that was used in model cars and airplanes when we were kids. And it was hallow in those dashes when you tapped on them. Compared to those the GT500 is frickin' A++. But you know what? In spite of the crap interior of the Lightning, those were the most awesome and fun vehicles I have ever owned.


Originally Posted by harleydude78
So your comparing a Fords interior to Lexus and Porsche? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the GT500s interior isnt as nice as a Mercedes or Bentley either.
You would be correct. It isn't.

Originally Posted by harleydude78
Its a Ford, which isn't a luxury brand to begin with so compare apples to apples. Compare it to a Camaro SS and a Challenger SRT8.
I never intended a head to head comparison. I posted that I never liked the modern Mustangs, nor the Shelby, now I do. I said it had an awesome engine and was fun. It would be even better if a car like that had a world class interior. The damn thing is 50 grand +. Lexus and Mercedes and Audi have cars in the 30k range ALL of which put American exteriors to shame (not just Ford). Interiors have always been one of the American manufacturers weakest qualities.

Your comments compared this Ford to Fords of old. Which is fine, and certainly legitimate. I mentioned the brands I did because I have experience with them, they have always been a point of reference for me and they have served as a benchmark that I use to judge. You brought up one point of view, I another.

However, if you want to compare apples to apples and use the SRT8, okay.

I wanted an SRT8. Went gaga over it when it first came out. Test drove it like crazy. Wanted it even more . . . until I started following owners forums and such and found out that mechanically, it was a nightmare.

But as for interiors... The seats in the SRT8 are nicer, more comfortable. The SRT8 is roomier. A tad more headroom (which is important for me as I'm fairly tall). I'm just barely hitting the ceiling of the GT500 with my head and that's with the seat tilted back. Not the most comfortable for long distance driving. SRT8 has more shoulder and hip room.

Beyond the seats, however, it's no contest. The GT500 wins hands down.

Feel better?

[Side note: I've already started reading owners forums for the 2010 and 2011 Shelby GT500. So far, the only common problem is with the transmission and the grind between 1&2. (seems to be exclusive with the Shelby) Time will tell if there are other things, but for now the Shelby is lookin' good]



Originally Posted by harleydude78
The GT does about equal to the M3:

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html

I am sure the GT500 isn't much worse.
Interesting. While waiting for the eclipse in the early AM I started going thru the reviews of "professionals", especially video reviews and most of them said what I did, the suspension wasn't worth squat. It (and the brakes, even though upgraded in the Shelby) were not adequate for a car with the amount of power and weight it had. (I believe one of them even referred to the handling characteristics as "a pig". OK, so I said "cow", whatever).

BUT . . . they were also of the same opinion that for those very same reasons, it didn't matter, it was "hella" fun to drive (as the kids these days say).

As for the M3 thing . . . based on the one I drove (a 2010), I'd have a hard time believing that, however, I have also read, and viewed on one of the aforementioned videos, that the 2011 model went aluminum with the block which saved over 100 lbs so it's not so nose heavy, and I believe there were tweaks to the springs and struts and shocks that improved handling considerably. Maybe.
 

Last edited by kobiashi; Dec 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 12:52 PM
  #40  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
When talking handling, it's pretty hard to compare a broadsword (Shelby) to a scalpel (sports car).

If you need a scalpel, a broadsword is just not going to the job, no matter how sharp it is.

But if you are a broadsword kind of guy, you care not what a trained surgeon can do with a scalpel.

To take the analogy in another direction, you should not compare a cow to a ferret, as this will only annoy the pig.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #41  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 159
From: DFW
Originally Posted by dirt bike dave
When talking handling, it's pretty hard to compare a broadsword (Shelby) to a scalpel (sports car).

If you need a scalpel, a broadsword is just not going to the job, no matter how sharp it is.

But if you are a broadsword kind of guy, you care not what a trained surgeon can do with a scalpel.

To take the analogy in another direction, you should not compare a cow to a ferret, as this will only annoy the pig.
you totally lost me


Isnt a mustang a horse?
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 02:19 PM
  #42  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
I'd put a sterling 10.5 under that gt500 to make sure it wont break on me...
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #43  
wackojacko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
I loved the looks so much that i put one in the driveway! It handles very good for a live axle. The power is amazing! Spinning the tires at 65 with the traction control on will never get old!



 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 08:12 PM
  #44  
racer114's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Texas
have you seen any of the reviews on the 11 stangs? It blows everything out of the water in the handling department

I wouldn't say that. But, it is pretty damn good for a live axle car, which is fine by the way, as it can smokes many IRS vehicles and makes a fool of the Camaro and Challengers.

To the OP, if you want a German sports car, go get one. That isn't the competition for a Mustang, GT 500 or F-150. Get a freaking clue.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2010 | 09:57 PM
  #45  
kobiashi's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in the EU
Originally Posted by racer114
To the OP, if you want a German sports car, go get one. That isn't the competition for a Mustang, GT 500 or F-150. Get a freaking clue.
Oh my God . . . you poor thing. You can't read!
 

Last edited by kobiashi; Dec 21, 2010 at 10:36 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM.