Contradiction or not?

 

Sounds like typical GOP stuff to me. Say one thing, do another...

 

You have to stop it with these logical arguments. Frank believes ClearChannel to be liberal therefore it is.

-Don

 

Where is the contradiction? All he did was point out that ClearChannel is, in fact, conservative.

Nowhere does he say he dismisses something on ClearChannel just because it is on ClearChannel.

-Don

 

You’re always going to have some morons among good people. I mean look they have a former KKK leader in the Senate and a democrat at that…

 

Ahhh, I see, ”Clearchannel, Rupert Murdoch or Conrad Black. All these owners are extreme neo-con rightwingers and don't allow dissenting views in the media they own.” and he is not going to dismiss anything they may have to say…

Guess I need a new definition on “contradiction”…

 

Wait, when did we find weapons of mass destruction?

The _fact_ is that we have not found any WMD.

My conclusion could still be in error but it is not because there are no facts to back it up.

-Don

 

In most unbiased media you will find find both sides of the issue being aired. Not with these guys. When was the last time you heard a dissenting view on Fox News without the so-called fair and balanced hosts interuppting with insults and denigration while basically dismissing what the dissenter had to say.
Guest: Well Bill, all the evidence to date suggests that no weapons were found and none are likely to be, so why did rumsfeld say he knew where they were.
Host: Well they were found. The president said those trucks were mobile weapons labs. Obviously they are and you are being unpatriotic and putting our troops in danger by saying they aren't.
Pretty 'fair and balanced' wouldn't you say?

sidenote:
Just for your information the trucks were later found to be just what the Iraqi's said they were. Helium pumping trucks for observation balloons. That is what the Brits said and they should know as they sold them to the Iraqi's in the first place.

 

DAMN!! All this typing and debating made me miss "Beat the Geeks" Damn Neo-cons, it's all your fault!!

 

Your conclusion was proven an error because just a few days ago they found buried a lot of missiles that have some type of blister gas, otherwise known as WMD’s…

Linked from Clinton News Network “Fair to the left”

Fair and Balanced

 

You see. You missed the whole point of the Lewinski affair. (Pardon the pun.) It wasn't about the *******. It was about why he lied about it, and what he was trying to cover up. Anyone who reads as much you do should have stumbled across the subject of the Paula Jones lawsuit. The two were connected. Clinton's lies were to prevent Paula Jones from being able to use Monica to establish character patterns for Bill, and strengthen her sexual assault case against him. Monica turned out to be of little help to Paula, supposedly due to Clinton using his influence to get her a job at the Pentagon. The perjury was connected to an ongoing lawsuit against the President and had nothing to do with Lewinski per se.

Of course the truth doesn't give you any ammunition to throw in the face of conservatives; so, you don't want to hear it. If you did, you would already know all of this and would never have made such a stupid, uninformed statement. I see this in a lot of the arguments made by the people here who claim not to be leftists. I should probably not read these political threads; but, I can't help it. It's like a train wreck. You just can't look away. I try not to make futile arguments in debates that are more about stamina than substance. I just can't help it sometimes.

 

Wow, the college debate team, there was a bunch of uber intelectuals regurgitating information from pamplets, encyclopedias and statistics from twenty years ago for the sake of....well, I never did figure out why. Wasting their time looking at dated information I guess. As far as arguments, I didn't see any from my end. I was just laughing, and maybe poking someone with a stick.

 

C'mon already!! A half dozen rotting old artillery shells filled with mustard gas left over from the Iran/Iraq war?? That's pretty **** poor evidence for justifying an invasion.
By defination a weapon of mass destruction produces death and destruction on a massive scale. Those shells might have had an effective radius of about 50 metres at best when they were new.
How about the cluster bombs and D.U. shells the US and British forces used in both Iraq conflicts? Both of them are gifts that keep on giving.

 

ClearChannel and FOX would seem to be a hell of a lot more conservative than say CNN. Right wing? Depends on your perspective. The further to the Left you are, the more to the Right the Middle, or a little Right of the Middle, seems to be.

 

Lots of posts since I was here last.
This one raised my eyebrow, I thought about it and think it is very true.
01 XLT Sport is referring to the Iraq invasion.
I don't know if Bush himself was aware that the election would turn on this one issue but, I predict it will cost him the White House in '04. November is just too far away for his approval numbers to hold up, especially when there is an actual alternative opponent whoever that may be. I think his best hope is that Democracts divide the vote of their Party amongst themselves to waterdown any one percentage. If Dean doesn't get the nomination he has the money to hang around and wreck it for the nominee.

I usually don't call an election when all the polls and 01 XLT Sport are against me but,
God told Pat Roberson that Bush would win in a landslide so I just couldn't help myself.

supercalifragilistic = So search will find this in November