Line-X, Rhino? Differences?
Originally Posted by jimmy k
In NJ? I don't think there is even a single one!
actually- the second Line-X dealer just opened for business in NJ. he is on route-22 in warren i think. the other one is somewhere near sayerville. the new one is closer to me but i am going to wait and let him get a couple beds under his belt before i bring mine in.
I did a lot of research last year before having my '06 XLT lined. From everything I've heard, both read online and from friends that have both Rhino and Line-X, Line-X is harder, and less "rubbery." Rhino, which I ultimately went with, is slightly rubbery. You can go back and forth forever about this, and everyone seems to have a preference, but I'd see if you can see (read: FEEL) either a sample at a dealer, a showroom truck, or a friend's liner in both Line-X and Rhino. In either case, the guy who applies it definitely makes a HUGE difference - I had mine done at a GMC dealer and it came out PERFECTLY. Don't take anything here as gospel, definitely take it as recommendations but in the end, go out and check them both out first-hand and make your own decision.
my .02 at least, HTH
my .02 at least, HTH
Originally Posted by TruckGasm
Thanks for the pics. I'll state some observations:
1. It looks like the dealer really didn't apply enough final texture, which is a dealer problem, not a Rhino problem.
2. You can see the effects of a low pressure product which is sort of wavy.

That waviness can also be seen here:

To contrast, here's LINE-X, which uses high pressure:

1. It looks like the dealer really didn't apply enough final texture, which is a dealer problem, not a Rhino problem.
2. You can see the effects of a low pressure product which is sort of wavy.

That waviness can also be seen here:

To contrast, here's LINE-X, which uses high pressure:

It can still be done, but it's more of a hastle. First, make sure the dealer has stencils to apply the logo. Then, he's going to have to apply a primer to existing surface, then apply another (thin) layer of LINE-X, then spray the stencil.
That's the correct way to do it. If a primer is not used, the old LINE-X could separate from the new LINE-X.
That's the correct way to do it. If a primer is not used, the old LINE-X could separate from the new LINE-X.
I have had esperience with all these and as far as overall superiority it would have to go to Speedliner. It is a cold spray and does take 48 hours to completely cure but when it is cured it is twice as strong as either the Rhino or Line-X. It maintains it's appearance and doesn't get hard and plasticy like a Line-X and doesn't fade like both of the others.
Test Speedliner Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc. TUFF STUFF® Speedliner® Advantage
Tensile Strength 4700 psi Actual results 1700-1900 psi 62-176% stronger
Tear Strength 865 lbs/in Actual results 140-150 lbs/in 476-517% stronger
Abrasion test 4.4 mg loss Actual results 10-15 mg loss 127-240% stronger
per 1000 rev Per 1000 rev
Elongation 570% Actual results 325-375% 42-75% stronger
Hardness 92 Shore A 85-90 Shore A None
Flammability 0 burn rate Actual results N.A.
U.V. Strength 80-89% gloss retention Actual results N.A.
after 2000 hours
Di-Electric Strength 278 V/mil Actual results N.A.
(+/-35)
Test Speedliner Rhino Linings U.S.A., Inc. TUFF STUFF® Speedliner® Advantage
Tensile Strength 4700 psi Actual results 1700-1900 psi 62-176% stronger
Tear Strength 865 lbs/in Actual results 140-150 lbs/in 476-517% stronger
Abrasion test 4.4 mg loss Actual results 10-15 mg loss 127-240% stronger
per 1000 rev Per 1000 rev
Elongation 570% Actual results 325-375% 42-75% stronger
Hardness 92 Shore A 85-90 Shore A None
Flammability 0 burn rate Actual results N.A.
U.V. Strength 80-89% gloss retention Actual results N.A.
after 2000 hours
Di-Electric Strength 278 V/mil Actual results N.A.
(+/-35)



