2009 - 2014 F-150

2011 order guide is out!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 11:23 AM
  #91  
tstjohn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by brazzeal15
wow. just did some research... the 3.5 ecoboost puts out less power than the 5.0 and they say that it tows 1500 lbs more?! Ford is really tryiing to sell a more fuel efficient vehicle I guess. I think Im going to save my cash for a '11 Race Red STX Supercab 4x4 with the 5.0.... plus im fairly certain that the aftermarket will lean more towards performance parts for the 5.0, 6.2, and 3.7... That 5.0 is already a beast in the new stangs. I feel like a kid that saw his parents wrapping the christmas presents.. haha.
Ecoboost will have more torque and at a lower RPM therefore more suitable for towing.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:06 PM
  #92  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,530
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Doesn't matter what the max HP and TQ numbers will be on the EB - the real point is the TQ curve is gonna be flat as a pancake - it will have more low end torque than the 5.0 and maybe even the 6.2. Think an old 4.9 I6 on steroids.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #93  
brazzeal15's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, Tx/Ft. Sam Houston, TX
Didn't think about the more stable RWD. Disregard my comment. Ha. I wonder what this beast of a V6 is going to run. And I also wonder what the aftermarket is going to do to really awaken the beast that a turbo V6 could be. but still looking forward to the 5.0
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #94  
°°Pat°°'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Outaouais, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by brazzeal15
Didn't think about the more stable RWD. Disregard my comment. Ha. I wonder what this beast of a V6 is going to run. And I also wonder what the aftermarket is going to do to really awaken the beast that a turbo V6 could be. but still looking forward to the 5.0


Just look at what they're doing with the current car with EB.


They're at over 425hp and 420lb-pd with almost ''nothing'' done to them,
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 04:35 PM
  #95  
cc1999's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
I use a long bed ext cab half ton truck for work and I went with a GMC last time, because Ford did not offer a loaded version, I am seeing on page 4 that it shows a
Lariat availble in a 4x4 supercab 163"WB, then on page 12 it shows the long bed is only availble up to a XLT pkg and not availble in the Lariat. Anyone know whats up?
I am guessing its a misprint on pg. 4 and it is not availble in a Lariat just like last 2010. It is nice to see they are offering an aluminum 7 lug wheel for it now.

FYI, on the 6.2L I had a chance to tow with mine last week, went to Colorado with a 1000 pound load in the bed and came back with a 5500 pound trailer all in all it was about a 2000 mile round trip working the 6.2L. I am very impressed with the way that 6.2L pulls and pulls in the mountains. I might even go as far as to say it handles a load about as well as some of the old 7.3L PSDs I had years ago. I am sure the new 400hp 800 foot pound 6.7L would pull circles around it, but 5000-6000 pounds is about all I ever pull anymore so this 6.2L did everything I needed it to do. I was very impressed to say the least. I pulled the same trailer out there back in July with my 4speed auto, 6.0 06' max Silverado and the new 6.2L Ford put the old max to shame, with far more power and better control, and much better mileage too.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #96  
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Power Kid
Payload didn't change. Thats max payload from which weight of options will be deducted.

I agree re the axles.
Yeah, payload for late 2010 was 1810, and now a whopping 1900. Whoopie! Still, not worth much when trying to tag the truck to 11,200 of trailer. Of course I'm having issues at 5,000 pound of trailer, so anything more and I'll pass on to a Superduty anyway. Of course, I reserve my rights to change my mind!
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 08:45 PM
  #97  
Smokewagun's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by glc
Why don't you go back to a diesel?
Sorry glc, my head was stuck in my... well...

I'd go back, but frankly, the cost for the diesel versus the mild fuel economy gain is not worth the diesel engine cost anymore. Back when diesel fuel was cheaper than gas (not 25 cents more like today) and I could get a sales tax credit if I plated a "D" here in Illinos, it made a big difference. I find it harder to justify a smoker today when I drive it daily unloaded, and only haul a travel trailer 12X a year and a 4,000 pound flat bed 10X a year. Now, if the new 6.7 proves to be good and a real fuel saver over the 6.2L gasser, I may go back and run it 300,000 miles. Somehow, I see a fifth wheel in my future... someday.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #98  
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba
Im thinking of ordering this

fx4 supercrew with leather and heated seats. 6.5 foot box, 5.0L with upgraded tires and blisteins all the way around. max tow package with power mirrors.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #99  
Power Kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
Can't get the max tow with the 5.0L regardless of trim. EB is only engine with that set-up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:05 AM
  #100  
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba
Originally Posted by Power Kid
Can't get the max tow with the 5.0L regardless of trim. EB is only engine with that set-up.
thats gotta be the dumbest logic i have ever heard. ford you failed big time. next they will put coils in the back.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:12 AM
  #101  
Power Kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
I know your answer but I'll ask anyway... why did they fail you?
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:13 AM
  #102  
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba
Originally Posted by Power Kid
I know your answer but I'll ask anyway... why did they fail you?
Cause I want max tow but I don't want the 6.2 or a lariat or a turbo.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:17 AM
  #103  
Power Kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
Why not?

Do you need more than the 9,800lb max the 5.0L provides? The hitch in the max is only rated for an extra 1,000 lbs.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #104  
Power Kid's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Home of Crown Royal
Whats your 06 rated at? My 04 was "rated" for 8,700lbs so its not like 9,800 or 9,600 whatever it is... is low?
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 12:19 AM
  #105  
snopro31's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Manitoba
Originally Posted by Power Kid
Why not?

Do you need more than the 9,800lb max the 5.0L provides? The hitch in the max is only rated for an extra 1,000 lbs.
more or less I want the mirrors. when towing one trailers currently I can't see the tires from the mirrors and I like to be able to see them when trailering.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 PM.