2011 Ecoboost !
I'm late to this debate because I don't lurk here very much. I think a lot of you are selling the EB short just because it is a 6 cylinder. My wife has a Mazda CX-7 with a 2.3 Turbo 4 banger in it and it gets up and goes just as well as a comparable 6 cylinder crossover. Direct injection plus turbocharging yields great results in acceleration due to a flat torque curve. Go drive any VW/Audi vehicle with a 2.0T engine in it and you will understand. Every year since that engine made it's debut it's been on the top 10 engine list and for good reason. GM has done the same with the 2.0 Ecotech motors and Ford finally followed suit.
I talked to one of the guys at Unleashed tuning a couple months ago about the SHO equipped EB and he said those engines can easily put out 100 more HP with the stock turbos but they are limited by the stock fuel system. Once these engines hit a high volume vehicle like the F150 the aftermarket is going to have a field day with these engines. It's a lot easier to get more power out of a forced induction motor than it is a naturally aspirated motor.
With that being said I was dead set on a EB motor, but with the numbers the 5.0 is putting out in the new Mustang it has definitely gotten my interest so I am gonna wait and see what the reviews are on both of them especially if I have to pay more the EB.
I talked to one of the guys at Unleashed tuning a couple months ago about the SHO equipped EB and he said those engines can easily put out 100 more HP with the stock turbos but they are limited by the stock fuel system. Once these engines hit a high volume vehicle like the F150 the aftermarket is going to have a field day with these engines. It's a lot easier to get more power out of a forced induction motor than it is a naturally aspirated motor.
With that being said I was dead set on a EB motor, but with the numbers the 5.0 is putting out in the new Mustang it has definitely gotten my interest so I am gonna wait and see what the reviews are on both of them especially if I have to pay more the EB.
The EB won't match the current 5.4L It will exceed it in power and fuel economy.
Torque is as important or more so for towing. Check out the video of the 2011 V-6 Mustang v.s. the 2010 GT. The GT pulls away because of its torque. When the V-6 finally gets wound up, it starts gaining on the gap between it and the GT, but it is spinning very high rpm. My 5.4 pulls well at low rpm, therefore is very low in workload. I'll take it any day over a V-6 in a truck application. I don't care about overall HP in my truck.
Torque is as important or more so for towing. Check out the video of the 2011 V-6 Mustang v.s. the 2010 GT. The GT pulls away because of its torque. When the V-6 finally gets wound up, it starts gaining on the gap between it and the GT, but it is spinning very high rpm. My 5.4 pulls well at low rpm, therefore is very low in workload. I'll take it any day over a V-6 in a truck application. I don't care about overall HP in my truck.
Apparently they're gonna show off the Ecoboost in the Raptor, interesting...
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/06...oboost-v6.html
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/06...oboost-v6.html
Apparently they're gonna show off the Ecoboost in the Raptor, interesting...
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/06...oboost-v6.html
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2010/06...oboost-v6.html
Should be sweet.
Here it is. 2011 EcoBoost F-150. You also get a glimpse of the new dash screen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-spb8XIlqk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-spb8XIlqk
Last edited by Rambo; Jun 2, 2010 at 12:17 AM.
The EB won't match the current 5.4L It will exceed it in power and fuel economy.
Torque is as important or more so for towing. Check out the video of the 2011 V-6 Mustang v.s. the 2010 GT. The GT pulls away because of its torque. When the V-6 finally gets wound up, it starts gaining on the gap between it and the GT, but it is spinning very high rpm. My 5.4 pulls well at low rpm, therefore is very low in workload. I'll take it any day over a V-6 in a truck application. I don't care about overall HP in my truck.
Torque is as important or more so for towing. Check out the video of the 2011 V-6 Mustang v.s. the 2010 GT. The GT pulls away because of its torque. When the V-6 finally gets wound up, it starts gaining on the gap between it and the GT, but it is spinning very high rpm. My 5.4 pulls well at low rpm, therefore is very low in workload. I'll take it any day over a V-6 in a truck application. I don't care about overall HP in my truck.
As mentioned earlier, the V6 available in the Mustang is not the same as the EB 3.5L, however, by some reports the 3.7L V6 found in the Mustang will also make it to the 2011 F150. But it is nowhere in the same league as the EB 3.5L in terms of power.
It seems a lot of you assume that because it is a V6 it must be wound up to wrench the power out of it, nevermind the twin turbo set up and the specific tuning on it. Not all V6s are created equal.
V6's can definitely make some power, just look at the old VG30DETT in the Z32 Nissan 300ZX. I have a buddy that works on them and those things can make some insane power. He used to take me on ride alongs after he'd work on them.
The EB won't match the current 5.4L It will exceed it in power and fuel economy.
Torque is as important or more so for towing...My 5.4 pulls well at low rpm, therefore is very low in workload. I'll take it any day over a V-6 in a truck application. I don't care about overall HP in my truck.
Torque is as important or more so for towing...My 5.4 pulls well at low rpm, therefore is very low in workload. I'll take it any day over a V-6 in a truck application. I don't care about overall HP in my truck.
Some people need to look at the power, especially the torque curve of the EB3.5L. Regardless of how the engine makes it (I6, V6, V8), it's power is impressive.
Last edited by APT; Jun 2, 2010 at 08:52 AM.



