No joke..
Everything I've seen at the track, even professionally built cars making stupid power always seem to have some kind of problem after a few sessions.
are you ******in kidding me??
the other one is what a mustang dyno looks like
and if you want to be picky a mustang dyno is much better for tuning due to the extensive loading capabilities
is that graph from your mustang???
Last edited by Tally TransAm; May 24, 2008 at 01:13 PM.
Nope, that's from my 2006 F150 with the 37s on it. Pretty good numbers for a 6000# truck with 37s, 20x10s, CAI, and FartMasters. After the dyno I switched to Dynomax mufflers with a H-Pipe. I'm sure the tq numbers would of been better after the new exhaust. To clarify the graph, those two pulls were both Justin's tunes. I put down 216 rwhp before the 93 octane tune.
I'm not going to get into the debate between Dynojet vs Mustang Dyno because it won't end. People like to stick to their guns and can't have their mind changed so I won't bother. Agree to disagree. I've seen graphs from Mustang Dynos that looked a lot different than that. Weird.
I'm not going to get into the debate between Dynojet vs Mustang Dyno because it won't end. People like to stick to their guns and can't have their mind changed so I won't bother. Agree to disagree. I've seen graphs from Mustang Dynos that looked a lot different than that. Weird.
I'm wondering if it's possible for the dyno operator to change the layout of the print out with a Mustang Dyno? The ones I've seen have put their logo at the top, followed by the graph and than the numbers, comments, etc were at the bottom. Just for an example ...
No, I'm not. What's wrong with me thinking it's fake? I didn't flat out call you a liar, I just said it looks fake to me and wanted to see if I was the only one that thought that.




