I have just gotten stupider(see i even make up stupid frickin words) by reading this $h1t. Come on, ridge, you have no clue of what you are talking about and you clearly cannot tell the truth.

Trans Ams do not run a 4.9 0-60 stock, its 5.1, trust me, I have an 02 black WS6, I have done my research.

You claim to be able to beat any 5.4, then its a 5.4 2v, then its youll be able to beat a 3v Screw, then youll be able to beat them with frickin nitrous... make up your mind.

I feel that it is nauseating that you call your formula a trans am because "noone knows what a formula is" ---Are you serious???? you just figured noone knew the difference until someone called you out.

I suggest that we all be honest with each other and admit that 4.6's are not going to beat a 5.4 unless there is some serious advantages given to the 4.6(the 5.4 towing a boat perhaps, or maybe a blown coil pack, or maybe a reg cab with no bed vs a screw with 6 people in it and a fuel tank and a tool box in the bed)

And that we all ask that this thread is renamed to either "A few people who want to make themselves feel good by claiming they have beat 5.4's and the 5.4 owners revolting and poking fun at the ignorance of those very people, and one honest 4.6L owner with his head out of his *** siding w the 5.4 guys" OR my personal favorite: "Ridge sticking his foot in his mouth over and over again about everything that is mentioned"

But hey, what do I know?

 

seoncd best psot of this thread.....the first was

"please let me know what drug you are on....." or something like that.

 

LOL whered Thump go?

 

I would have to agree with that one

 

Thump is recovering from his shift at the **** station (read the whole thread). I'm sure he'll chime in later for more laughs

 

are you serious there is several places where you can find info on transam's hitting 4.9 0-60's and the formula is a 5.1, i never said i beat all the 5.4's i said ive beatin my parents about 4 differnt times, as for the 3v like i said a single cab 4.6 could probley take a screw 5.4 for the weight reason alone, but i havent lined up with a 3v 5.4, ive lined up with other trucks and ive beat some and lost some

 

Do you have links to back that up, perhaps you read it on some forum where people similar to yourself boast their bs, but they do it in 5.1. Maybe the guys who got 4.9 got their computers "turned up" by the stealership.

But last time I checked this was an f-150 forum...so im done arguing about this nonsense, and back the the point at hand here...you said you can beat 5.4's and didn't specify as to which ones...but the more people call you out the more it changes...next its going to be well there was a wooden block under the accelerator, and the brakes were locked...give us all a break man and follow a quote told to me since my young days

"It's better to be thought of as stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"

 

i didnt have anything until i just typed in 0-60 times in a seach bar and it proves just what i said

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

 

i dont beleive that site, they have been wrong in mny instances when id look up cvertain cars

 

clearly you didnt read the first page

When viewing this list, please keep in mind that day to day testing conditions are not always perfect (or even consistent) due to weather and track conditions! The results that "the experts" have provided may NOT reflect what your car is capable of doing under your conditions. This list is only meant to be a guideline, NOT THE GOSPEL!!! We are not trying to publish the exact (or even the best) numbers that a specific make and model of car can run every time out of the box. We are only posting this information as a basic guide so that anyone can use it as a base comparison. Every reasonable effort is taken to keep this list as accurate and up to date as is possible.

seriously dude, I laughed hard after the first 100 retarted things you said, now im just getting angry, and once again what is this site called again transam.com....no its f150online.com, and this is a 4.6 vs 5.4 thread, so please, stop with the nonsense...i want to be able to sleep tonight

 

Well all I can say is I know for a fact my 2000 WS6 Vert was faster than at least 2 (probably stock) Mach 1s. I raced one from a roll and a stop and the other from a stop and beat both pretty easily....we probaly ran a little less than a 1/4 mile but I was pulling on them both when we stopped. My car did have the performance gear option, and automatic, a SLP lid and Borla exhaust. I can also say a 03-04 Cobra would out run me quite easily...so to say a Mach 1 is faster than a Cobra is about as stupid as saying a 4.6 is faster than a 5.4.

As for the new Mustang GTs....hmm I didn't know they were supposed to be that fast. I might have to take the Hawk out this weekend and look for one.

 

i beat one in the formula the hawk shouldnt have trouble with it, the one i beat was a auto though. the guy was pretty cool too.

 

you'll win. the 300 hp 05+ GT's are making more power true, but like the F-150, they packed on a little weight. Guys in 00-04 GT's with exhaust/tunes/throttle bodies are running similar times and winning "impromptu" races with the new GT's (when stock)

can we let this thread die? I ain't posting again unless someone says something amazingly dumb again.

 

Exactly

 

Guys, post some examples of bone stock 1/4 mile trap speeds and call it a day. Trap speed is the best indicator of how fast a vehicle is. 0-60 times mean nothing. I should know, my STI will take a viper to 60 then fall on its face.