Guess the Dyno #'s on this Tuned F150
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Found this from Mike:
Originally Posted by Superchips_Distributor
(Snip)
"Now in the new body style trucks with the 5.4 3V 300 HP engines in a 4WD configuration (run in 2WD mode) using the 4R75-E transmission (updated 4R70W, basically), we see it makes about 220 RWHP stock on the same eddy-current dyno that we did a lot of the Lightnings on, for an 80 HP driveline loss in round numbers - representing about 26.67% loss. The 5.4 3V motors, if actually allowed to turn enough rpms to hit their power peak at the rear wheels, generally make their 300 HP rating from what we've seen - they are not significantly under or over-rated, on average."
So I *probably* gained 37 HP which doesn't sound good, but 257 at the rw isn't too bad overall for a 3.25" AF1 and maggie exhaust. I can certainly feel the power gains when driving. I also think there is more there since I'm running really rich.
Duke
Originally Posted by Superchips_Distributor
(Snip)
"Now in the new body style trucks with the 5.4 3V 300 HP engines in a 4WD configuration (run in 2WD mode) using the 4R75-E transmission (updated 4R70W, basically), we see it makes about 220 RWHP stock on the same eddy-current dyno that we did a lot of the Lightnings on, for an 80 HP driveline loss in round numbers - representing about 26.67% loss. The 5.4 3V motors, if actually allowed to turn enough rpms to hit their power peak at the rear wheels, generally make their 300 HP rating from what we've seen - they are not significantly under or over-rated, on average."
So I *probably* gained 37 HP which doesn't sound good, but 257 at the rw isn't too bad overall for a 3.25" AF1 and maggie exhaust. I can certainly feel the power gains when driving. I also think there is more there since I'm running really rich.
Duke
Last edited by F150 Duke; Nov 18, 2006 at 05:57 PM.
Congrats Duke
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 5
From: NC
Originally Posted by RockPick
CMC plate? Maybe that's a dumb question but, what's that?
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Well I may be wrong but once my fuel curve is fixed I should also see an improvement.
I'm big time lean (over 13) at low RPMs. Then it dives down to big time rich (off the charts rich) at higher RPMs.
Duke
I'm big time lean (over 13) at low RPMs. Then it dives down to big time rich (off the charts rich) at higher RPMs.
Duke
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by assasinator
a cammed 05 stang picked up to 308 rwtq from 275 rwtq just by dialing in fuel.
his HP went from 7200 rpm and 318 rwhp to 6700 and 337 rwhp just from fuel. i watched it with my own eyes.
his HP went from 7200 rpm and 318 rwhp to 6700 and 337 rwhp just from fuel. i watched it with my own eyes.
Duke
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by alex_pitts87
how many horses to wheels is a nisan titan
Duke
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Deatsville, AL
Originally Posted by rms8
Hey guys,
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
Last edited by mcdover; Nov 19, 2006 at 08:51 PM.
