Guess the Dyno #'s on this Tuned F150
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by BalogUK
awesome duke! man i wish there was a dyno around my neck of the woods
Duke
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA & Montana
can you export to a .jpg? if not, maximize it as much as you can, press "prnt scrn" on your keyboard, then in paint or any program, press paste, and it will paste the screen shot... save as a .jpg, then upload to your gallery
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Trempealeau, WI
Nice numbers!!!
Well, one of two isn't bad.
I just might have to make an appointment to get my truck dynoed there when I am on my way to St. Cloud in a couple of weeks. Since there is no place down here with a dyno, or at least no place that I know of.
Originally Posted by F150 Duke
Well nobody guessed both but PHS79 guessed hp and was off on trq when he guessed 305.
I just might have to make an appointment to get my truck dynoed there when I am on my way to St. Cloud in a couple of weeks. Since there is no place down here with a dyno, or at least no place that I know of.
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by PHS79
Nice numbers!!!
Well, one of two isn't bad.
I just might have to make an appointment to get my truck dynoed there when I am on my way to St. Cloud in a couple of weeks. Since there is no place down here with a dyno, or at least no place that I know of.
Well, one of two isn't bad.
I just might have to make an appointment to get my truck dynoed there when I am on my way to St. Cloud in a couple of weeks. Since there is no place down here with a dyno, or at least no place that I know of.
PHS79, send me an email or PM when you plan on going to the dyno in Elk River. I'd like to meet up with you and watch the run.
Thanks,
Duke
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Nice numbers Duke, little higher than mine. I would have guessed clode to that considering the Troyer seems to make better numbers even on a 91 octance tune. I was at 254hp/326tq with the edge on level 3 with MAC catback, and airaid Jr. Nice Truck also. Rich. 
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 2
From: Northern Illinois
Originally Posted by F150 Duke
Well nobody guessed both but PHS79 guessed hp and was off on trq when he guessed 305.
In the 3rd gear pull:
HP – 257.49
TRQ- 329.81
I'll try and do a screen shot of the graphs to show you guys.
Once again the mods are:
3.25" AF1
Magnaflow SIDO catback with a magnaflow resonator
TP 91 Octane Tune
5.4 3V V8 2005 4WD 3.73 LS
A/F ratios were off the charts rich so I'll be sending this to Mike for additional tuning and maybe we'll be able to get a little more out of it, but these numbers are still really good.
Conditions:
65.49 degrees Fahrenheit
29.10 in-Hg
Humidity: 10%
SAE: 1.00
Duke
I took screen shots of the graph and am just trying to figure out how to save the screen shots as jpgs to post them.
In the 3rd gear pull:
HP – 257.49
TRQ- 329.81
I'll try and do a screen shot of the graphs to show you guys.
Once again the mods are:
3.25" AF1
Magnaflow SIDO catback with a magnaflow resonator
TP 91 Octane Tune
5.4 3V V8 2005 4WD 3.73 LS
A/F ratios were off the charts rich so I'll be sending this to Mike for additional tuning and maybe we'll be able to get a little more out of it, but these numbers are still really good.
Conditions:
65.49 degrees Fahrenheit
29.10 in-Hg
Humidity: 10%
SAE: 1.00
Duke
I took screen shots of the graph and am just trying to figure out how to save the screen shots as jpgs to post them.
Hey guys,
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Trempealeau, WI
Originally Posted by rms8
Hey guys,
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by rms8
Hey guys,
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
There are a couple threads in the chips forum where 04+ F150s with the 5.4 and 4WD dyno at 210 at the rear wheels.
So I gained 47 at the rear wheels and should be able to get a little more after fixing the rich A/F ratio.
There isn't a big difference on these motors between the 87 oct tune and 91 or 93 oct tune. They have a hard time taking advantage of the higher octane. Usually less then 5 HP difference. That's what Mike has seen as well as the tuner I was at.
Duke
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by rms8
Hey guys,
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
You made 257hp to the tires. To put things into perspective, one must take into account 17-20% parasitic drag due to accessories and automatic tranny. This equates to roughly 310-321hp at the Flywheel. The motor is already rated at 300 flywheel HP from Ford.
So all the mods netted a max of 10-21hp.
Just FYI.
Curious to see what the $$ to HP-gained ratio would be?
Has anyone chassis dyno’ed a stock motor?
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 2
From: Northern Illinois
Originally Posted by PHS79
Actually these trucks have around 30% drivetrain loss (if 4WD). Most bone stock trucks are in the 200-210rwhp range.
30% parasitic loss!!!!!! (I would have used the big eyed icon, but for some reason, they don’t seem to be working???).
Is this a well known fact with Ford automatics? That seems extremely high. Considerably more than I would have ever guessed. If that’s true, then it’s a down right shame!
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by RockPick
I'm going to guess 257.49 / 329.81
What are the numbers Duke?
What are the numbers Duke?
What a guess, how did you do it?
Yeah fellas, the loss on our trucks is substantial. Dodge isn't much better, same with GM. Nissan has the best % of us all and puts more to the rear wheels then the Hemi Ram. I remeber reading in the tuning forums that Rams put 240 to the rear wheels and Titan puts 260 to the rear wheels.
Duke