1997 - 2003 F-150

May be a total noob question but...

Old Mar 20, 2014 | 09:58 PM
  #1  
Cobblewobble's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, Tx
May be a total noob question but...

For starters...I have a bone stock 01 Screw 4.6 2wd. I recently purchased an SCT SF3 3015 from MPT that came with their 3 free tunes. I chose to do a 93 Octane Performance Engine Tune With a Race Trans Tune. I've yet to do a dyno test but plan to soon. I've noticed a HUGE gain in drivability and seat of the pants dyno results...My question is, Am I feeling the affect of a placebo or am I truly noticing gains...and if so how much of a gain is likely from a bone stock 4.6? I've browsed the search feature possibly not enough but have yet to find the realistic actual gains of a real good tune on 93 octane. Thanks for any help you can offer...seems to be plenty of wisdom here...
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2014 | 10:03 PM
  #2  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
As I recall, you would be getting about 20 hp gain with that engine.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2014 | 10:09 PM
  #3  
Cobblewobble's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, Tx
Originally Posted by Bluejay
As I recall, you would be getting about 20 hp gain with that engine.
Much appreciated good sir! As soon as I have dyno results to post I will in order to help others like myself in the future.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2014 | 10:20 PM
  #4  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Cobblewobble
For starters...I have a bone stock 01 Screw 4.6 2wd. I recently purchased an SCT SF3 3015 from MPT that came with their 3 free tunes. I chose to do a 93 Octane Performance Engine Tune With a Race Trans Tune. I've yet to do a dyno test but plan to soon. I've noticed a HUGE gain in drivability and seat of the pants dyno results...My question is, Am I feeling the affect of a placebo or am I truly noticing gains...and if so how much of a gain is likely from a bone stock 4.6? I've browsed the search feature possibly not enough but have yet to find the realistic actual gains of a real good tune on 93 octane. Thanks for any help you can offer...seems to be plenty of wisdom here...
Hi & Welcome!

I did a very cursory search fer yall ( usin' the handy-dandy Search function) - there are many, many more like the ones below. I hope this helps.

The takeaway here is - gains depend upon many factors - a major one being yer exact strategy code, and whether/ how yer tunin' feller takes advantage of it. Overall vehicle condition and maintenance being another. Fresh plugs, fresh front O2's, fresh fuel filter, clean MAF & TB, healthy cats, other mods, any pre-existing conditions, etc ...


https://www.f150online.com/forums/2653179-post4.html

https://www.f150online.com/forums/ch...fter-chip.html

https://www.f150online.com/forums/ch...at-expect.html

https://www.f150online.com/forums/2472291-post6.html

good luck!


MGD
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 02:05 AM
  #5  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
Just curious, why are you planning on spending a good bit of money running the truck on a dyno when that's the only modification? Not criticizing, I just wouldn't spend the money unless I had multiple, more extensive mods done to justify the cost.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 02:14 PM
  #6  
Cobblewobble's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, Tx
Originally Posted by KMAC0694
Just curious, why are you planning on spending a good bit of money running the truck on a dyno when that's the only modification? Not criticizing, I just wouldn't spend the money unless I had multiple, more extensive mods done to justify the cost.
Well luckily I have a friend who owns a shop with a dyno so cost wont play much of a role. Its more for just a comparison of stock tune vs 87 octane performance tune vs 93 octane performance tune. And to identify any problem areas that may be lacking. Unfortunately he doesn't have a copy of SCT Advantage software to tune the truck directly but I can forward any results to Mike at MPT to make any needed adjustments. Plus...it would probably help another noob somewhere down the line once I have dyno sheets...
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 02:29 PM
  #7  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
Originally Posted by Cobblewobble
Well luckily I have a friend who owns a shop with a dyno so cost wont play much of a role. Its more for just a comparison of stock tune vs 87 octane performance tune vs 93 octane performance tune. And to identify any problem areas that may be lacking. Unfortunately he doesn't have a copy of SCT Advantage software to tune the truck directly but I can forward any results to Mike at MPT to make any needed adjustments. Plus...it would probably help another noob somewhere down the line once I have dyno sheets...
Okay, that's cool! It will help some other folks later for sure
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 21, 2014 | 03:22 PM
  #8  
jethat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,522
Likes: 6
From: Utah
Long ago I bought a gryphon tuner and it came with 3 tunes. I tried each one and settled in with the tow tune for awhile and one day I had my brother inlaw who is a transmission guy in the truck with me while I was accelerating hard getting on the freeway. He said the transmission was shifting to hard and if I kept it up my transmissions life expectancy would be shortened. I changed it back to stock since. My tranny has almost 150k on it. My preference would be to get every thing I can out of it so I am ok with how it runs stock.
 
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 03:30 PM
  #9  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
I like the firm hard shifts that don't wear the clutches as much. I ran the Gryphon performance tune for 135,000 with no problems on my 2005. Just another opinion or like.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2014 | 03:33 PM
  #10  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
^That was my understanding of increasing the firmness a little bit. Maybe not stupid hard like a race tune, but a little bit.
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 AM.