Timing Chain Broke and piston hit head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-21-2007, 01:11 PM
KForce's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just had this happen to me. broke the chain on the passenger side bank.

it didn't break the piston tho but bent every valve in the head. had a valve job done on both heads, and a complete head job. also all new timing chains, gears, and guides.

parts and labor i had around 1300. 700.00 of it was the head job w/head gasket kit (almost 300.00 for the gasket kit) :P

and i had like 250.00 in the complete timing kit from advance so 950.00 in parts and 400 in labor.

but my truck runs like new now.

kyle
 
  #17  
Old 12-21-2007, 01:16 PM
stein78's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The timing chain broke on my 4.6 in my Mustang, I'll never forget the sound it made. It happened at idle at a red light. I would junk the shortblock, who knows what damage the pistons, rods, rod bearings took with the shock. I put a new shortblock in the mustang and got the head fixed. That's probably the most cost effective way to do it or find a decent used longblock.

This is what the shortblock looked like and all the valves that hit were obviously bent, but no other damage to the head.

 

Last edited by stein78; 12-21-2007 at 01:20 PM.
  #18  
Old 12-21-2007, 08:00 PM
DYNOTECH's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The timing chains are extremely durable. I have seen many off of 200,000 mile engines and higher that are like new. However usually the main reason a timing chain will break is because a cam started to seize in the cam bore from lack of oil. With that said I suspect if you were to remove the cam caps on the failed cyl head you will see over heated bearing surfaces and or heavy galling of the aluminum in the cam bore. This condition puts too much strain on the chain ( acts like a brake) and the chain fails. The pistons will hit the valves if chain timing is lost. Breaking a chain is very rare on these engines if sufficent lubrication is available. If I was you I would follow some of the others advice here and just get a reman or a long block. We used to dyno test Jasper remans at Romeo. They are a very good replacement engine with decent warranty. Good luck.
 
  #19  
Old 12-21-2007, 10:38 PM
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: >wwOwww<
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 02XLT4X4
No, not all OHV engines are interferance. Ford is kind enough at least to not put a timing belt on the ones that are anymore.

And I have only heard good things about Jasper rebuilt engines.
do you have an example.
because overhead valves and the size of the combustion chamber ther is no othe place for the valves to be.
 
  #20  
Old 01-03-2008, 04:57 PM
ljvanwingerden's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update: Thanks for all your input and help

A valve locked up which caused it to shatter. When that shattered it smashed the spark plug next to it. So there wasn't any timing chain issue because both of them where on and fine.

I decided to go with a jasper engine and I get the truck back tomorrow.
Thanks!
 
  #21  
Old 01-03-2008, 05:32 PM
hllon4whls's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mandeville, La
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tumba
do you have an example.
because overhead valves and the size of the combustion chamber ther is no othe place for the valves to be.
1985 Isuzu Imark 1.47 4cyl engine. non interference. Break the timing belt, dead in the water. Put new timing belt on, time the cam and back in business. Happened 2 times on my dads car when I was in high school. Broke every 62k miles or so. Since I am off on a tangent anyway. Had to pull the motor to get the timing belt off. Frame was in the way of the crank pulley and bolt. Couldnt get it off withouth pulling the engine. Repair maunal had 3 steps. 1) Pull engine and transaxle. 2) Change timing belt. 3) Replace engine and transaxle.
 
  #22  
Old 01-03-2008, 07:38 PM
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: >wwOwww<
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by hllon4whls
1985 Isuzu Imark 1.47 4cyl engine. non interference. Break the timing belt, dead in the water. Put new timing belt on, time the cam and back in business. Happened 2 times on my dads car when I was in high school. Broke every 62k miles or so. Since I am off on a tangent anyway. Had to pull the motor to get the timing belt off. Frame was in the way of the crank pulley and bolt. Couldnt get it off withouth pulling the engine. Repair maunal had 3 steps. 1) Pull engine and transaxle. 2) Change timing belt. 3) Replace engine and transaxle.
is this an overhead valve engine
 
  #23  
Old 01-03-2008, 08:12 PM
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: >wwOwww<
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by hllon4whls
1985 Isuzu Imark 1.47 4cyl engine. non interference. Break the timing belt, dead in the water. Put new timing belt on, time the cam and back in business. Happened 2 times on my dads car when I was in high school. Broke every 62k miles or so. Since I am off on a tangent anyway. Had to pull the motor to get the timing belt off. Frame was in the way of the crank pulley and bolt. Couldnt get it off withouth pulling the engine. Repair maunal had 3 steps. 1) Pull engine and transaxle. 2) Change timing belt. 3) Replace engine and transaxle.
i couldn't find an image of that engine on yahoo.
i'm just curiuos about "non interference"
sounds like an advertising gimic.
 
  #24  
Old 01-03-2008, 08:26 PM
B-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The old 2.0L & 2.3L I-4 engines in the 80's Rangers were non-interference engines.

Several of my friends and myself had the pleasure of replacing a failed timing belt and breathing the sigh of relief when you realize that no valve damage had occurred.

A non-interference engine WILL NOT make valve to piston contact, no matter where the cam / piston timing may be.
 
  #25  
Old 01-03-2008, 08:37 PM
chris1450's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: western washington
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tumba
i couldn't find an image of that engine on yahoo.
i'm just curiuos about "non interference"
sounds like an advertising gimic.
as was said... the 2.3 OHC pinto motor and many other motors are not interferance engines. I do believe most all 302/351 engines are non interferance engines. You brake a timing belt or chain on one of these engines, and you won't get any damage from the valve/piston hitting each other. interferance engines on the other hand will cause damage.
 
  #26  
Old 01-03-2008, 08:46 PM
grant5127's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Marcos, TX
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ljvanwingerden
I have a 1997 F150 V8 4.6 Triton 4x4.

I had a rhythmic ticking and didn't think much of it because it was really faint and didn't effect the performance of the truck. Then one day driving home I was waiting in traffic and the engine just shut off and wouldn't restart. It would turn over but not start.

I took it to a mechanic and he said that it was the timing chain. He took it apart and found that the timing chain broke and the piston hit the valve and bent it. I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place now.

I don't know whether I should fix the valves and timing chain or if I should just buy a used or refurbished engine and drop that in the truck. Any advice would be great!

Thanks
Whats the mileage on this disaster??
 
  #27  
Old 01-03-2008, 08:54 PM
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: >wwOwww<
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
does anyone here have a cross section or other diagram?

i would like to see how the valves are possitioned above the piston

thanks
 
  #28  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:31 PM
hllon4whls's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mandeville, La
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tumba
is this an overhead valve engine
Every engine sold in every car in the united states today is an OHV engine with the exception of the wankel engine (RX8). The isuzu is an OHV and an over head cam. 2v, so only one cam with 8 lobes.
The 4.6, 5.4 is an OVH and OHC. The 4.2v6 is a pushrod motor (cam in the block). The 4.0 current in the explorers and mustangs is OHV and OHC.

The 302, and 351 (5.0 and 5.8) are OHV pushrod engines. A flathead is not an OHV motor. The valves are in the block and run more or less in parrallel with the cylinder bores. Your lawnmower engine could be a flathead or and OHV design. Just depends on what you purchased.

See below for the differences. In a non-interference engine, as the piston moves up and down in the bore, cannot contact an open valve if it were to get stuck open for any reason including a cam timing belt or chain breaking.


 
  #29  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:44 PM
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: >wwOwww<
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
bad day!
 

Last edited by Tumba; 01-03-2008 at 10:16 PM.
  #30  
Old 01-03-2008, 09:49 PM
hllon4whls's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mandeville, La
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tumba
i know the difference.
thanks.
i guess the heads contain the more than the 78cc heads that i have worke on in the past. so the valves on these engines never go past the decl point of the head. so it would take a longer stroke to get the same compression.
that is what i was curious about.
i'm hear to learn. no matter how stuppid the question is, please don't always assume the one asking is a total moron just because he can't spell.
thanks for you patronizm i hope you rise above that someday
My intention was not to patronize you. I simply thought that you didn't understand the relationship and wanted to change that into comprehension of what was happening.

See, I have already risen of above my patronizm but not my patriotism.
 


Quick Reply: Timing Chain Broke and piston hit head



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.