Still want comment on the 4.0l V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-11-2003, 01:45 AM
rwalsh76's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still want comment on the 4.0l V6

Guys,
Realize this is an f150 site. However, I still beilieve tht hte 4.0L Cosworth 6 in my Ranger is the finest engine I've ever owned. Love to hear your opinions.

RW
 
  #2  
Old 08-11-2003, 03:44 AM
Bo747's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 4.0 is a fine engine, the two that I've owned, '94 and '00, have been very reliable, but their performance is depressing.

I'd much rather have a Chevy 4.3. I had an old '94 Blazer 4.3, and a '99 S10, they are just as reliable, but will easily dust the 4.0s in performance. Finest V6s in my driving experience
 
  #3  
Old 08-11-2003, 09:32 AM
acadianabob's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'd be very surprised if cosworth had anything to do with the 4.0 V-6 in the ranger. no offense intended, but cosworth is a racing engine subsidiary of ford; CART, Formula One, etc
 
  #4  
Old 08-11-2003, 01:29 PM
decoy562's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, the Chevy 4.3 is definitely more powerful, but a piece of crap. Had one in a S-10, the transmission went out at 37k miles and the engine at 70k. My 2 fords have never done that
 
  #5  
Old 08-11-2003, 03:41 PM
TF's Avatar
TF
TF is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: California
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't there a big difference between the '00 4.0 and the '01 4.0? I think that's when they went to the SOHC engine and picked up an additional 47 hp. All things the same, the new one should be able to keep up the the 4.3 GM.
 
  #6  
Old 08-12-2003, 10:19 AM
SPROCKET_X's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Valencia, California
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got a 4.sl0w in my Exploder.....good engine but it's got 140k on it right now but has always been slow and weak from the begining but hasn't given me to many problems, I've got a freind with over 300k on his '93 Ranger with the stock motor and no major problems and it still is pretty peppy.
 

Last edited by SPROCKET_X; 08-12-2003 at 10:47 AM.
  #7  
Old 08-12-2003, 10:44 AM
Home skillet's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THe 4.0L SOHC is actually a Roush design.
 
  #8  
Old 08-12-2003, 03:17 PM
man164's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Zelienople, PA
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that the 4.0 SOHC engine has good power and the 5 speed auto tranny that they have it mated to make a great match. The SOHC is a much better engine for power than the older OHV engines.

But, I do not like the SOHC for a very different reason. I only got 45,000 miles out of mine. I lost oil pressure because the oil pump drive gear slipped on its shaft. This was in a 2001 Explorer Sport, and Ford told me TS. I have since gotten rid of that vehicle, but was dumb enough to buy another Ford.
 

Last edited by man164; 08-12-2003 at 03:20 PM.



Quick Reply: Still want comment on the 4.0l V6



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.