Licking the V8 tears

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2014 | 02:41 PM
  #1  
Raptor05121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 7
From: Live Oak, FL
Licking the V8 tears

There is a "1997-2003 F-150" Facebook group and it seems every day there is a post from some guy with a lifted V8 on 33s complaining that he only gets 250 miles to a tank. I revel in the fact I can go 400+ without refueling. When I post a pic of my trip meter at 467 miles with the "Low Fuel" light on, everyone gets mad at me. All those years of having guys with V8s laughing at us, now we can laugh at them.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2014 | 04:37 PM
  #2  
dirk upson's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: riverside,california
i can get 500+ miles left in my raptor, too. no tears here......
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2014 | 09:52 PM
  #3  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
I can get 500+ on a tank and stomp V8s all day long.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2014 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
il_duce's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Honestly, I don't see why this is even a worry/conversation in the truck community. The conversation has really shifted from "how much can I haul," or "what HP/torque does this thing have," to "what MPG am I going to get." I could understand if it were a difference between 10 MPG and 40 MPG. That would be quite significant and worth looking into. Otherwise, I bought a truck to do truck things. I didn't buy a truck to get me 40 MPG and be "environmentally friendly." I'm not worried if I get 15 MPG vs. 23 MPG (or whatever the Ecoboost and V6 community is getting). If I wanted a vehicle that got good gas mileage, I guess I would get a Prius. If people with V8s are seriously complaining about MPG, then they should go buy a hybrid car or something. Personally, MPG is the last thing I consider in a truck. After all, IT'S A TRUCK.

For what it's worth, I have a V8 and get 450+ miles per tank. Granted, it's a 36 gallon tank
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2014 | 10:35 PM
  #5  
thelariat02's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 2
From: U.P. of Michigan
Originally Posted by Raptor05121
There is a "1997-2003 F-150" Facebook group and it seems every day there is a post from some guy with a lifted V8 on 33s complaining that he only gets 250 miles to a tank. I revel in the fact I can go 400+ without refueling. When I post a pic of my trip meter at 467 miles with the "Low Fuel" light on, everyone gets mad at me. All those years of having guys with V8s laughing at us, now we can laugh at them.
I'm in that group too, its a pretty funny read. It just full of rednecks that think everything aftermarket is a God send. They love their WAI's and fartmaster. There is no reasoning with them. I think we are fighting a losing battle.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2014 | 11:54 PM
  #6  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,538
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Originally Posted by thelariat02
I'm in that group too, its a pretty funny read. It just full of rednecks that think everything aftermarket is a God send. They love their WAI's and fartmaster. There is no reasoning with them. I think we are fighting a losing battle.
There's a lot of that over here too.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 12:25 AM
  #7  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
I could get 500 miles to a tank if I added about 20 gallons it


Originally Posted by il_duce
Honestly, I don't see why this is even a worry/conversation in the truck community. The conversation has really shifted from "how much can I haul," or "what HP/torque does this thing have," to "what MPG am I going to get." I could understand if it were a difference between 10 MPG and 40 MPG. That would be quite significant and worth looking into. Otherwise, I bought a truck to do truck things. I didn't buy a truck to get me 40 MPG and be "environmentally friendly." I'm not worried if I get 15 MPG vs. 23 MPG (or whatever the Ecoboost and V6 community is getting). If I wanted a vehicle that got good gas mileage, I guess I would get a Prius. If people with V8s are seriously complaining about MPG, then they should go buy a hybrid car or something. Personally, MPG is the last thing I consider in a truck. After all, IT'S A TRUCK.

For what it's worth, I have a V8 and get 450+ miles per tank. Granted, it's a 36 gallon tank
I agree. I do complain about my 11 MPG, but I drive fast ('N loud) and I could've gotten a Focus, and nearly brand new at that, for the same money, but that ain't what I want to drive.
 

Last edited by KMAC0694; Jan 20, 2014 at 12:28 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 11:00 AM
  #8  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Ive gotten up to 520 miles on a tank and i only have the 26 gallon tank .

And my lil 3.5 whoops up on most of these big manly sounding v8's
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 11:08 AM
  #9  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
My truck and my car have V8s and I wouldn't want it any other way! Maybe after the dumocrats completely kill the economy, I'll have to switch to a Fiesta.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by il_duce
Honestly, I don't see why this is even a worry/conversation in the truck community. The conversation has really shifted from "how much can I haul," or "what HP/torque does this thing have," to "what MPG am I going to get." I could understand if it were a difference between 10 MPG and 40 MPG. That would be quite significant and worth looking into. Otherwise, I bought a truck to do truck things. I didn't buy a truck to get me 40 MPG and be "environmentally friendly." I'm not worried if I get 15 MPG vs. 23 MPG (or whatever the Ecoboost and V6 community is getting). If I wanted a vehicle that got good gas mileage, I guess I would get a Prius. If people with V8s are seriously complaining about MPG, then they should go buy a hybrid car or something. Personally, MPG is the last thing I consider in a truck. After all, IT'S A TRUCK.

For what it's worth, I have a V8 and get 450+ miles per tank. Granted, it's a 36 gallon tank
it also depends on how much driving is done, for someone that drives alot then you do worry about fuel mileage.. Ive put 20k on my truck in 9 months, so i am concerned with fuel mileage, that's the only reason i haven't leveled my truck out and went with a bigger tire cause i will probably drop from 20-21mpg down to 15-16 mpg.. 5 mpg is a lot to me considering the miles i drive.

Now if i drove my truck 25 or 30 miles a day round trip then i wouldnt be worried about fuel mileage and would have the bigger tires, suspension leveled etc.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 11:14 AM
  #11  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
I put 62,000 on my truck in two years, so mpg is important to me, for sure. Also, having a truck when I need it is very important. How many miles I get per tank is of no concern to me since I fill up well before I run it low, but averaging 19 mpg over that 62,000 is important.
 
__________________
Jim

Last edited by Bluejay; Jan 20, 2014 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 11:43 AM
  #12  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Roadie
My truck and my car have V8s and I wouldn't want it any other way! Maybe after the dumocrats completely kill the economy, I'll have to switch to a Fiesta.
Amen Brother! My Vic has a 4.6 & my truck has a 5.4!...........
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 02:31 PM
  #13  
Raptor05121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 7
From: Live Oak, FL
Look what was in my newsfeed today... lol

Name:  loled_zps88e93bb0.jpg
Views: 36
Size:  63.2 KB

Like glc said, these same guys post pics of their trucks on 33's with lift kits going through mud puddles, then complain about the mileage.
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 02:40 PM
  #14  
thelariat02's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 2
From: U.P. of Michigan
But come on that 5" stack alot of those guys run must help make up for loss of mpg with big tires right? Haha
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 08:48 PM
  #15  
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
From: Houston and College Station, TX
That's some 20" lift on 44s with 3.31 (or like 2.56) gears on a 4.6 mileage right there.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 PM.