mmhmm

 

you seriously made a thread just to bash on someone who made his sig say his hp? i smell jealousy

 

This is an old thread. This thread was made to call out Raptor on his 230hp/270tq scan gage claims. You havent been around long enough to understand.

and trust me im definitely not jealous of raptors truck!.....

 

I dont think raptor was purposely bull ****ting, his scan tool was just inaccurate, its unbelivable because a guy on v6f150 has a complete top end kit with cam and 42lb injectors and walbro and hes at 220rwhp. nothing against Raptor hes cool.

 

yes Raptor is cool i bust his ***** though. His engine is completely stock. The scangage is NOT a tool used for accurate HP. or MPG claims. For istance my buddies truck was in Neutral going down a hill and the SG said 500 MPG....

 

thanks 4 clearing up the obvious trimble-

 

Wow, welcome to 4 months ago!!! And part of it wasn't just the numbers in his sig, it was the size...omg that drew people's eyes right to the numbers. But he's a good kid

 

......with a PA install video & Batman Cookies

You all have got to love the entertainment that he has contributed to this forum.

 

Haha. Well, I learned a lot since I've been here. I'm just now realizing, okay, those were a big bogus since what you guys have showed me. But....I'm moving on to 17 now, so the immature 16 is gone, along with my ugly gray bumper..

Sorry to anyone I pissed off about all of this. Didn't really know a whole bunch about #'s, I just got excited about what I saw, so whatever. I wouldn't mind going to a dyno one day. *hoping* for 165-170 rwhp maybe? being too zelous here?

 

165ish would be about right...

 

as they said in the 70's:
Keep On Truckin'

 

Hey Raptor
I have actually been impressed with the SCanGuage II. I found that when measuring TQ the ScanGuage II read within 5 FT/LBs of what Ford claims my truck should make. I added an AF1 and registered a 20 FT/LB increase right around 3000 RPM's. While I am not 100% sure of that gain it does seem that in taking a baseline reading then a reading once modified that I should be close to the actual gain.

You did enter in all your info about the motor right?

 

Just dragging this back from the dead!

 

But why?!?!?

 

It's very accurate, despite what people say.