Low Temp Thermostat gains
#1
#3
even though it's only such a low amount in HP is it simply better for the engine to run the low temp thermostat? kinda like using synthetic over regular oil? won't be able to tell but it's just better - is that the case here?
BTW, how much for the thermostat? And is it a do it yourself thing?
BTW, how much for the thermostat? And is it a do it yourself thing?
#4
#6
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: St. Louis (Out in the woods)
Posts: 7,247
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes
on
97 Posts
Running a low temp thermostat is a fool's game. It is NOT good for your engine!
All it does is keep the engine closer to warmup mode so it runs richer. This will cause accerated wear and tear elsewhere, especially cylinder walls. Cats will also be taxed by the extra-rich mixture.
The lower cooling system temperature does not correlate to lower intake air temperatures.
The engine was designed for peak efficiency at around 200F. By running it at 160-180F, you are assuming all the risks.
The only benefit that can be gained from these stats is if you are getting detonation from excessive cylinder head temps. If this is the case, the thermostat is only a Band-Aid.
Pass on the low temp thermostat.
Steve
All it does is keep the engine closer to warmup mode so it runs richer. This will cause accerated wear and tear elsewhere, especially cylinder walls. Cats will also be taxed by the extra-rich mixture.
The lower cooling system temperature does not correlate to lower intake air temperatures.
The engine was designed for peak efficiency at around 200F. By running it at 160-180F, you are assuming all the risks.
The only benefit that can be gained from these stats is if you are getting detonation from excessive cylinder head temps. If this is the case, the thermostat is only a Band-Aid.
Pass on the low temp thermostat.
Steve
#7