Suspension
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2" (or larger) leveling kit on 2009 - maybe not such a good idea

Old Mar 6, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #1  
2009KR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
2" (or larger) leveling kit on 2009 - maybe not such a good idea

I put on a 2" AS leveling kit on my 2009 4x4 last year. I have posted my pictures and concerns about the extreme angle of the upper control arm earlier this year, but now have a new concern. After reading the Bilstein literature (thinking about swapping my leveling kit for a 5100 to have a little lower front end since I am going to tow a 4 ton trailer this summer), they claim an issue with leveling kits is that they prevent the strut-limiter from engaging properly resulting in suspension damage. Well, on my truck, the strut clearly no longer limits the suspension travel with the leveling kit installed. The photo below shows that my upper control arm can hit my spring (truck is jacked on the frame here).


And this photo shows the scar on the spring from the impacts it has had with my upper control arm. This is with a truck that is not driven off road.



I am removing my 1" stacked block next week and adding Firestone airsprings to level out the back, both unloaded and loaded. (Without the 1" stacked block, my front was 1/2" higher than my rear with the 2" kit.) What do you think about swapping out my 2" AS kit, which raised my front nearly 3", with Bilstein 5100's set to 1.5"?
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 01:56 PM
  #2  
Joe_STX's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
I see that Daystar makes a 1" leveling kit. Do you know of anyone who has tried this? I have always felt that a 2" leveling kit puts the upper control arm at a bad angle.
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2011 | 10:58 PM
  #3  
2009KR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
The group is surprisingly quite about this. Thoughts anyone?
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2011 | 02:35 PM
  #4  
LOWCOUNTRYKR's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
They must have done some serious changes because I have had 2.5" kit up front on my 2008 for 2 years now, with no impact on the springs
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 05:52 PM
  #5  
2009KR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Does anyone have similar pictures with Bilstein 5100s?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #6  
hammer40's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Vashon Island, WA
I just put a 2.5" kit on mine and it doesn't look near that bad. Although, I don't jack it up and let the suspension drop like that.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:11 PM
  #7  
dozerdog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
I've had mine on my 2006 ext-cab for a couple years,haven't had that, or any other issue. mine is an offset steel model (can't remember the brand), which is 2.5". If i remember right, the reason I chose it was because they advertised something about the above problem.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 09:39 PM
  #8  
Big_Smokey's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
i had a 3" on my 06 screw and didnt have that problem....hmmm nothing on my 10 though
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
2009KR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Mine is the offset version from autosprings.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 09:26 AM
  #10  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
I'm quiet because I'm speachless (yes, me)

All I can say is - those poor balljoints....

It never ceases to amaze me why folks will compromise the ride quality, travel, reliability and safety of their stock suspension geometry for something as ethereal as a 'look'.


There are ways to do this correctly - and that ain't it.

MGD
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 09:51 AM
  #11  
BlacKnBack's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by MGDfan
:



It never ceases to amaze me why folks will compromise the ride quality, travel, reliability and safety of their stock suspension geometry for something as ethereal as a 'look'.




MGD
Cause we can...
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #12  
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by BlacKnBack
Cause we can...

Roger that! I figgered there HAD to be SOME reason

I must be gettin' old - I no longer enjoy invoking the pucker factor


MGD
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 11:10 PM
  #13  
2009KR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MGDfan
I'm quiet because I'm speachless (yes, me)

There are ways to do this correctly - and that ain't it.
MGD
Don't just leave us hanging... I suggested the Bilstein 5100s - do you think that is the correct way? At what height would you set them?
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2011 | 09:20 AM
  #14  
BlacKnBack's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Roger that! I figgered there HAD to be SOME reason

I must be gettin' old - I no longer enjoy invoking the pucker factor


MGD
Sure you do.....you just don't remember.......
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 09:23 PM
  #15  
2009KR's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Does anyone have Bilestein 5100s on an '09? What setting did you use? How do your UCA angles look compared to mine?
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.