PowerWorks / Magna Charger 04-06 3V Supercharger system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #1  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
PowerWorks / Magna Charger 04-06 3V Supercharger system

Get your order in now! They are taking orders, and they are selling FAST !
Call one of the site sponsors and get your order in!

Emissions testing has been passed and the E.O.# will be issued soon!!

If you are tired of getting spanked by the Chevy/Dodge guys this is your ticket to a BIG SMILE!



 

Last edited by FORDTRK; Mar 3, 2006 at 12:54 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 01:22 PM
  #2  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
271.4 @ 5000 RPM
310.8 @ 4000 RPM
These are not numbers for a stock 5.4 3v engine (220-225rwhp), what kind of modifications has the vehicle used on this test before the S/C ?
Thanks.
 

Last edited by rafa26; Mar 3, 2006 at 08:30 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 02:56 PM
  #3  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rafa26
271.4 @ 5000 RPM
310.8 @ 4000 RPM
These are not numbers for a stock 5.4 3v engine (220-225rwhp), what kind of modifications has vehicle used on this test before the S/C ?
Thanks.

Had a flow master on it, thats about it.....

I am looking at the gain! 143 RWHP!!
 

Last edited by FORDTRK; Mar 3, 2006 at 03:12 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #4  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
You mean that installing only a flowmaster in a 5.4 3valve truck which has 220rwhp you jumped to 271.4rwhp : ??? 51.4rwhp gain ??? No way.
Something is very wrong dude. Mustang Dynos are not the best option. Those numbers does not match the reality, better dyno the truck on a different dyno otherwise you are the only one in the world with a stock 271.4rwhp in the world. Don't take me wrong, i am not here to fight anybody, i am here to get and share information and make some friends but better you re-dyno the truck. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #5  
05RoushMarkLT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, Alaska
The 271 RWHP stock number caught my eye right off the bat. There is either something modified with the truck from the get go, or a dyno that is seriously over compensating.

Take a look at the stock whipple test truck at 224 RWHP, or any other exhaust/intake/tuner F150 on here and you won't see many numbers above 245RWHP. A flowmaster isn't getting you 50RWHP. Somebody will show up after buying the magna charger and get considerably less RWHP and question what is going on. These are dangerous marketing practices for a company to take.

However, those are great numbers regardless and nice to see trucks pulling that kind of horsepower now! It just costs you more than a supercharger to get there.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
I guess you guys are not seeing the big picture....Look at the gain 143 rwhp. Dynos are just a measuring tool.....who cares what the basline or test was, its the gain.

Geez did not think there would be a lynching.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #7  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by FORDTRK
I guess you guys are not seeing the big picture....Look at the gain 143 rwhp. Dynos are just a measuring tool.....who cares what the basline or test was, its the gain.


Geez did not think there would be a lynching.
There is no linching here man, and,
"""Big picture""" is tell the potential customers the truth, it's good ethics if every company will always inform their customers hp gains over stock engines. It is not a good idea to claim hp gains on modified engines and i tell you why, i will give you one example, let's say a dude less informed than us read your post and look on the 414.8rwhp on the dyno sheet, he will think that magnacharger is the S/C that makes more power than anyother and probably will buy it because of the wrong information, after he installs and dyno his truck he will see 360rwhp and will get crazy and feel tricked. That is why Roush, Procharger, Powerdyne, Kenne Bell, Whipple etc.. won't test modified vehicles to make hp claims in the media.
 

Last edited by rafa26; Mar 3, 2006 at 08:24 PM.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #8  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rafa26
There is no linching here man, and,
"""Big picture""" is tell the potential customers the truth, it's good ethics if every company will always inform their customers hp gains over stock engines. It is not a good idea to claim hp gains on modified engines and i tell you why, i will give you one example, let's say a dude less informed than us read your post and look on the 414.8rwhp on the dyno sheet, he will think that magnacharger is the S/C that makes more power than anyother and probably will buy it because of the wrong information, after he installs and dyno his truck he will see 360rwhp and will get crazy and feel tricked. That is why Roush, Procharger, Powerdyne, Kenne Bell, Whipple etc.. won't test modified vehicles to make hp claims in the media.

other than the flowmaster there was not a single mod on the truck.

There is truth plenty there, 143 rwhp gain. I have nothing to hide, and nothing to lie about.....Sorry we are getting great results from this set up, but its true, 390-410 will be easy to reach with this system.

Its all about the gain, that is why both dyno charts are posted. If I wanted to wave my ***** around I would have posted the one chart and been done. rafa, I am not sure where you are going with this. THis is the same blower and the Roush and Trilogy supercharger systems use....I dont see anyone questioning their gains....This is a new design, something that the FORD market has not seen. This inlet forward design has proven to be way more efficient on the GM line over the last 5 years. I would challenge you to sit back and wait for these to hit the market and go from there. Dont look at the BIG number, look at the gain....that is all I ask.
 

Last edited by FORDTRK; Mar 3, 2006 at 08:42 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #9  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by FORDTRK
other than the flowmaster there was not a single mod on the truck.

There is truth plenty there, 143 rwhp gain. I have nothing to hide, and nothing to lie about.....Sorry we are getting great results from this set up, but its true, 390-410 will be easy to reach with this system.

Its all about the gain, that is why both dyno charts are posted. If I wanted to wave my ***** around I would have posted the one chart and been done. rafa, I am not sure where you are going with this. THis is the same blower and the Roush and Trilogy supercharger systems....I dont see anyone questioning their gains....This is a new design, something that the FORD market has not seen. This inlet forward design has proven to be way more efficient on the GM line over the last 5 years. I would challenge you to sit back and wait for these to hit the market and go from there. Dont look at the BIG number, look at the gain....that is all I ask.
Ok, let's take that way,
Stock truck=224rwhp + 143rwhp= 367rwhp.
Not the best gains in the market, but top 3.
Good S/C.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #10  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rafa26
Ok, let's take that way,
Stock truck=224rwhp + 143rwhp= 367rwhp.
Not the best gains in the market, but top 3.
Good S/C.

who else is claiming 143+ in the market with a supercharger...oh and and a chokemaster?
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #11  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by FORDTRK
who else is claiming 143+ in the market with a supercharger...oh and and a chokemaster?
Whipple does, 170rwhp gains.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #12  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rafa26
Whipple does, 170rwhp gains.

at what boost level?
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #13  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Originally Posted by FORDTRK
at what boost level?
At 8.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #14  
FORDTRK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rafa26
At 8.

We are at 7......guess we could throw some more boost at ours
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #15  
rafa26's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
From: hatboro-pa
Why not ??
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.