Stock 4.6 Single Cab run?
#17
#19
#21
But 5.4L owners do not want to admit it.:o
#24
#25
HI!... I know, it was a joke.....................
I have actually raced a 2009 F-150, 4X2 with the 4.6 3-VALVE, with my 2007 Ranger. Wasn't even close. Ripped him out of the hole by like 4 truck lengths and just kept pulling on him. I shut down at 150KPH and he was like 8 trucks behind. We shot the crap after wards. He couldn't believe a Ranger whooped him like that. lol!
I have actually raced a 2009 F-150, 4X2 with the 4.6 3-VALVE, with my 2007 Ranger. Wasn't even close. Ripped him out of the hole by like 4 truck lengths and just kept pulling on him. I shut down at 150KPH and he was like 8 trucks behind. We shot the crap after wards. He couldn't believe a Ranger whooped him like that. lol!
Last edited by Neal; 02-11-2010 at 01:59 AM.
#26
Except for the 2009 and newer 3V 4.6L which has some serious get up and go. With the 6 speed tranny there would be no competition. It's only rated at 292 HP but it seems to out-accelerate the 5.4L and rear wheel dynos often show higher output on the 3V 4.6L compared to the 5.4L. So, with the 3V 4.6L's 100 lb. weight advantage, it will likely be the fastest quarter mile F-150 in stock form without any blowers, etc.
But 5.4L owners do not want to admit it.:o
But 5.4L owners do not want to admit it.:o
post links to these "dyno's" or I'll get the flag
#27
according to this, both the 3 valve 4.6 and the 5.4 come with a 6 speed automatic...
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/f150/2010/review.html
so that takes your worthless claim and
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/f150/2010/review.html
so that takes your worthless claim and
#28
according to this, both the 3 valve 4.6 and the 5.4 come with a 6 speed automatic...
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/f150/2010/review.html
so that takes your worthless claim and ...
http://www.edmunds.com/ford/f150/2010/review.html
so that takes your worthless claim and ...
dam so the heritage model 4.6 should out gun the newer bodystlye 4.6 cause the weight diffrence between the two trucks.
#29
When people ask nicely I'll generally help them with their homework. But, if you want to be rude, you can go do your own homework.
I will say the only two sets of independent dyno runs that I've seen published for the 4.6L 3V and 5.4L (both stock) both showed the 3V 4.6L making slightly more power than the 2009 5.4L. You, rude one, can try to find them on your own.
I will say the only two sets of independent dyno runs that I've seen published for the 4.6L 3V and 5.4L (both stock) both showed the 3V 4.6L making slightly more power than the 2009 5.4L. You, rude one, can try to find them on your own.
#30
My 08 4.6L 2V has 248hp stock. THey bumped it up in 2008 from 2007 but the torque stayed the same at 293ft lbs. The hp may not be a huge difference over the 4.2L but it has a much better power band and lower rpm torque. I owned a 99 F150 Singlecab 4.2L and I can say, that even though my 08 is a little heaver, the truck is a whole other animal.
Last edited by Project F150; 02-11-2010 at 12:00 PM.