Pre-1997 Models

5.8 Am I the Lone Ranger

Old Jan 20, 2002 | 08:33 PM
  #1  
UncBob's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Oreland PA
5.8 Am I the Lone Ranger

All I read about is 302--302--302==5.0--5.0--5.0

I am going crazy

Am I the only one in the wotld with a 93/ 5.8

Didn't anybody but me get their trucks with the 5.8

Damn salesman tried to talk me out of oderering the 5.8 and 3.55s
Said I wouldn't need it.

Now I see his real reason was so I wouldn't feel like the Lone Ranger.

Everybody talking how great the 5.0/302 is , then the damn 5.8 must be good for something besides burning gas
Even the Dodge 5.9 has more horses and torque and it is a dinosaur
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 08:38 PM
  #2  
Donate54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: FL
ill trade ya my 5.0 (195,000 miles) for your 5.8, that way you could fit in with the majorty
 
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2002 | 10:00 PM
  #3  
Mike Lewis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Dickinson, TX USA
I dunno why the 5.0 was so popular in these trucks; the 5.8 was known as a truck engine.

Seems like everyone has a 5.0. I searched for a 5.8 when I bought my truck, but they were all in really bad shape (truck as a whole.)

Bought a clean 5.0 with only 66,000 miles on the clock. Not bad for a '91 in '99.

The good thing about the 5.0 is that is probably one of the most trouble free engines Ford ever made.

-Mike
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 02:51 PM
  #4  
IzzyEddy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, ON, Canada
Cool

I've heard that the 351 isn't much better for the everyday person running around. In my year ('94) the 351 has something like 5 - 10 HP more and the torque is like 30-50 lb-ft more. The 351 also burns more gas than the 302 for the same type of trips. Generally the people who where buying these trucks didn't need the 351 and chose the 302 instead. Not loosing much in the HP & TQ catagories and is better on fuel economy. How could you beat it.

Have Fun & Keep on Truckin'
Dean
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 02:53 PM
  #5  
btolenti's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Vacaville, CA USA
I don't know about all of you, but I would love 30-50lb-ft of torque!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2002 | 09:48 PM
  #6  
curt73@aol.com's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: NY
I have a 5.8 351 w in my 89 f150 4x4. i have 3.55's c6 tranny, 4inch lift 33's bfg. boy i get like 8 miles to the gallon. I am searching for ways to save on mpg other than selling my truck. by the way ford's inline 6 300 cu inch block was the best block ford ever made. it had a little less hp and almost as much torgue as the 302. i hauled a cement mixer with taht truck and it was fine. the 302 is famous for rear main seal leaks. at least where i live.
 
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2002 | 11:23 AM
  #7  
fordby4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I think we could argue forever on the best block FORD ever made, ....just goes to show FORDs quality

Anyway, I don't see anything wrong with the 5.8's! I've always been impressed when I drove them, and if it wasn't for the fact you need a tanker to follow you everywhere, I'd have one!
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 22, 2002 | 10:17 PM
  #8  
DonKingKong's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
My 1995 F-150 regular cab with the 351w gets better fuel economy then my 1998 Expedition with the 4.6L v8
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2002 | 02:29 AM
  #9  
Mike Lewis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Dickinson, TX USA
When I test drove a used truck with the 351W, it got better mileage than the 302... Problem was, the rest of that truck was falling apart--not well cared for.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 01:55 PM
  #10  
Fordtrucklover's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,Texas
Talking 5.8Liter Engine

I lost a 93F150 in a wreck. I bought a used 351W for rebuild. I now own a 1995 F150 XLT,5.8L ILOVE it!
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 01:55 PM
  #11  
Fordtrucklover's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,Texas
Talking 5.8Liter Engine

I lost a 93F150 in a wreck. I bought a used 351W for rebuild. I now own a 1995 F150 XLT,5.8L ILOVE it!
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #12  
ccnseven's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere Down South
UncBob, nice lookin truck
I think trucks are more for looks now than for makin a livin out of. That may be why dealerships carry 5.0 trucks mostly, not a lot of new trucks with 351's
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 06:35 PM
  #13  
Ray21's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: R
I LOVE my 351w
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #14  
mustang42's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
You are not the only one with the 5.8. Even though the 5.0 is mighty, I just swapped in the 5.8 to my truck. Let the gas guzzling begin.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 10:45 PM
  #15  
MnvlMat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Manville NJ
I gots me a 5.8 and 4.11 gears. I get about 16 mpg.
Granted its a lightning.... but Im not complaining.
 

Last edited by MnvlMat; Aug 26, 2003 at 11:11 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.