Pre-1997 Models

Inherent problems w/ '95 F-150s?

Old Mar 11, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
DIYMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Inherent problems w/ '95 F-150s?

Hey all,
Just a question for a friend. He is looking at a 95 F-150 4x4 and was wondering if there were any issues he should be wary of. I told him that the body issues were the only ones I know of. No big deal there since he'll be using it as a workhorse, but admittedly I am not a real expert on that generation of trucks. He didn't have much info about it, but I told him I would ask anyway.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #2  
StrangeRanger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
From: Copley, Ohio
The worthless POS annular slave cylinder.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
DIYMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Originally Posted by StrangeRanger
The worthless POS annular slave cylinder.
Ok, elaborate. What's the solution, just replacement?

--DIY
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #4  
StrangeRanger's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
From: Copley, Ohio
An automatic tranny is the best solution. No clutch = no slave cylinder.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #5  
DIYMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Ok, I believe it's an auto, but thanx for the info. Anybody else know of anything else to watch for?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
PHS79's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Trempealeau, WI
My 94 F150 4X4 with 300-6 and 5spd has been a great truck. I beat the crapp out of it and it just comes back for more. The only issues that I have had with my truck is the wiper motors, I have replaced the motor 2 times now. I did replace the slave cyl once, but that was at 120,000 miles so it was about due anyway. Otherwise just reg maintance stuff, balljoints, u-joints, ect. Heck I haven't even had to replace the clutch yet and the truck has 160,000 very hard, well used miles on it.

I would tell your buddy that if the truck drives nice and the price is right, buy it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #7  
DIYMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Anybody else?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #8  
1muddytruck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: Lansdale, PA
I had a 95 2wd with a 351, auto, and Reading tool cap (very heavy steel cap) it was one of the cheapest to own vehicles I have ever had. Some little issues here and there, but nothing I couldn't easily fix in my driveway. Outstanding work truck. I sold it with 140k 3 years ago, and the guy who bought it loves it. He uses it to tow a landscaping trailer.

 

Last edited by 1muddytruck; Mar 11, 2008 at 11:09 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
hockeyfanjeff's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Parker, CO
Only problem I ran into on my 93 was the dual fuel tanks. The front tank was pumping gas to the rear tank
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #10  
DIYMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Originally Posted by hockeyfanjeff
Only problem I ran into on my 93 was the dual fuel tanks. The front tank was pumping gas to the rear tank
Lol, as long as the front tank is buying the gas, that sounds good to me.

Anybody else want to weigh in with an inherent problem?

-DIY
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:52 AM
  #11  
1muddytruck's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: Lansdale, PA
Oh yea, I forgot about the fuel tank thing. One of the in tank fuel pumps died, and was fairly expensive to fix. The other one still worked, but the sending unit didn't, so I had to use the odometer to know when to buy gas. I ended up selling it with just the one tank working. He should ask the seller if he has replaced either pump/sending unit. It'd be nice if he has.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #12  
Nathan Plemons's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Bowling Green, KY
I have a 95 F-150 that I've had to put a slave cylinder in once, well after 100k miles. At 177k miles now it still runs like a champ.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #13  
shroomie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 96
Likes: 1
From: Daytona Beach
Mine has some minor electrical issues.

Also, those damn Ford window motors can be a pain. I eventually replaced those stupid plastic ***** with steel ball bearings.

Overall though, it's a great truck.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #14  
PHS79's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Trempealeau, WI
Originally Posted by 1muddytruck
Oh yea, I forgot about the fuel tank thing.
I forgot about it until just now also. The front tank was replaced when I bought my 94, back in 97 with 64000 miles. Then sometime around 01-02 the front tank started pumping fuel into the rear tank. I had the pump replaced 3 years ago cost for the pump and labor was just over $200, after 3-4 days that pump went out also. The mechanic that did the work just told me to bring it back in and that I would not be charged anything for replacing the pump again. It has worked great ever since. I just don't know what the odds are that the front tank is on its 4th pump, but the rear is still the original.
 
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #15  
Nathan Plemons's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Bowling Green, KY
Strange, my dad and I replaced the fuel sending unit in the front tank of my truck. The unit still worked, but the float had developed a hole and filled with fuel, thus it was more of a sinker than a float.

If either of the fuel pumps had been replaced prior to our ownership I don't know.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.