Mitt Romney!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2012 | 12:55 PM
  #31  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Last I remember I was just slightly over the legal limit.

After reading that post, I'm just glad Madonna wasn't on the radio when I logged on.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #32  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Those dirty, greedy Republicans...

http://nation.foxnews.com/mitt-romne...romney-gave-15
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 05:00 PM
  #33  
str8t six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 6
From: swamps of la
thats nothing new, democrats, on average, donate less than republicans.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 07:07 PM
  #34  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
I guess for the four years, 2000-2004, the Obamas 1% and 99% was a little different than what the Occupy movement has been stinkn the place up saying. They gave away 1% and kept 99% for themselves. Yes, man of the people. Oh, I'm sure they paid their "fair share" in taxes too.

Oh, sorry. I forgot. I'm supposed to be bashing republicans and ignoring the damage being done to this country by the current occupiers.

Carry on.
 
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2012 | 11:19 PM
  #35  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
Paul will NEVER get the nomination, he is too "out there". A vote for him is a wasted one.
The Nomination will be between Romney and Gingrich. And Romney cannot debate under pressure, Obama will eat him alive. Gingrich is the only candidate that can go toe to toe and defeat Obama. He has been a professional debater for over 40 years and the only one that has the confidence to take Saul Olinsky (Obama) down.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:25 AM
  #36  
str8t six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 6
From: swamps of la
Originally Posted by aussiekeeper
Paul will NEVER get the nomination, he is too "out there". A vote for him is a wasted one.
if everyone who said that voted for him, he would win.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:55 AM
  #37  
aussiekeeper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 991
Likes: 1
From: Sierra Vista, Az.
Originally Posted by str8t six
if everyone who said that voted for him, he would win.
Sounds like another wasted vote to me................
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 01:11 PM
  #38  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
For me it's really all about getting rid of obama. Typically I wait until all of the primaries are over before deciding who to vote against since voting for a candidate is never an option because they always suck. This time it is different, my disdain for obama grows daily! I would rather a stray cat be President before wanting him back in office and I HATE cats. Right now I prefer Gingrich to the rest of the crowd. I always thought he did a good job as Speaker of the House and his baggage isn’t as bad as some of the others. I like some of Paul’s ideas as they align with my Libertarian side but some of his other ideas, not so much. However, I do not see him beating obama which to me is the most important issue in this election. Romney sucks and voting for him will be more painful that it was voting for McCain.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #39  
str8t six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 6
From: swamps of la
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 01:43 PM
  #40  
str8t six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 6
From: swamps of la
Originally Posted by aussiekeeper
Paul will NEVER get the nomination, he is too "out there".
yeah, i guess governing by the constitution, preserving liberty and freedom that was intended by the fathers of the country is rather "out there"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tF2Ro...eature=related
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 09:48 PM
  #41  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
We can bitch and moan all day long about this RINO or that adulterer, or that nut job. Only one is going to get the nomination. Then what? You going to take your ball and go home?

They all SUCK! They all SUCK less than the current occupier.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Mvux...layer_embedded

Making this country right again is going to take time, patience and persistence. Giving up now, because you don't like how the game is played, is a big mistake. We can change the rules of the game. It's just going to take more than one or two cycles.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:09 PM
  #42  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
I agree with some of Paul's domestic ideas. The states rights, cutting spending, killing welfare etc all sound good to me. However, his isolationist foreign policies seem to lead down a road that we have been down before and the results weren't so great. I do not want the US to be the world cops, I do not want us to be involved in nation building and I would really like us to be out of the middle east. But... I remember we tried to stay out of the problems Europe was having in 1914-1917, right up until that pesky Zimmerman note came out. After that mess was over we tried to stay free of their problems. Some might go so far as to say we were an Arsenal of Democracy. That worked great until Pearl Harbor. We didn't have to fight the commies during the last half of the 1900s but the world is a much better place because we did.

For me it comes down to this, we are in an unenviable spot. We ARE the top dog right now love it or hate it. As top dog all the little dogs are either gonna nip at your heels or follow along with your lead. We need to balance doing our own thing and letting the other dogs follow vs putting the smack down on the ankle biters. My problem with Paul is that he doesn't seem to want to do anything to stop them from gnawing away and making trouble. The worst person the world has ever known was an Austrian painter, who saw that one coming? We must stay vigilant and stop something like that before it happens again. Hiding between the Atlantic and Pacific with Canada as a hat won't get the job done.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:20 PM
  #43  
01 gt f150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 9
Our constitutional rights are systematically being removed and going towards a socialist republic. We have certian rights provided by the constitution but now adays politicians make those rights available when it's convenient or gets them votes. This country is going to crap in a hand basket due to liberalism and Moral decline... Thanks MTV! In my opinion, If you haven't Served in the Military you can't be a politician or the Comander and chief. You shouldn't be able to send our boys to the **** unless you have been there yourself.

I propose a new Re-write of Veterans Day. If you are not a Vet you don't get it off. If you are a Vet, You get it off Paid. It is a Day to respect our Veterans but it has turned into a multi million dollar budget issue at both federal and state level paying all the over paid a$$ wipes a day off they don't deserve or didn't earn. How is it Kids in school and state and federal employees get it off? Why? Veterans day is for Vets Not the average joe that was to scared or spineless to serve a once great country. We need to get back to basics and take care of our own before we run off spending billions on some third world country trying to be Captian Save A Hoe. 80% of homeless people are Vets with Issues the regular citizen can't even begin to understand or comprehend. Yet millions of people walk right past they bitching about their smell rather than thank them for putting the ***** on the line for their ungreatful asses. Nough Said.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2012 | 07:45 AM
  #44  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by wittom
We can bitch and moan all day long about this RINO or that adulterer, or that nut job. Only one is going to get the nomination. Then what? You going to take your ball and go home?

They all SUCK! They all SUCK less than the current occupier.

Making this country right again is going to take time, patience and persistence. Giving up now, because you don't like how the game is played, is a big mistake. We can change the rules of the game. It's just going to take more than one or two cycles.
I agree. I'll take Romney/Gingrich/Santorum over Obama any day. But I do prefer Ron Paul.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2012 | 02:07 PM
  #45  
str8t six's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 6
From: swamps of la
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVUQu...layer_embedded
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.