Lightning/C1500 race
Hi, my buddy has a 2000 short box C1500 5.3 with elderbrook headers @ 3" exaust, air raid filter@ superchip. the truck is slammed and has 20" buds, He feels that it has 400 dyno'd hp at the rear wheels! the race is on with my 01 lightning (stock )should I be worried? any opinions welcome. thanks Sean
I wouldn't worry too much...
The '00 5.3 had 285 hp at flywheel, and I believe 350 lbs. torque.
Edelbrock claims a 9 hp gain with their Headers alone.
I would say he is looking at this for horsepower...
285-50 at the Flywheel= 235
Headers 9
Exhaust 15
Airaid 15
Superchip 20
---------
294
I would guesstimate, w/o a dyno run, around 290-300 hp, and around 370 lbs. torque at the tires.
Anyone else, have any suggestions or comments...
Good Luck, R1968
Edelbrock claims a 9 hp gain with their Headers alone.
I would say he is looking at this for horsepower...
285-50 at the Flywheel= 235
Headers 9
Exhaust 15
Airaid 15
Superchip 20
---------
294
I would guesstimate, w/o a dyno run, around 290-300 hp, and around 370 lbs. torque at the tires.
Anyone else, have any suggestions or comments...
Good Luck, R1968
No chance
http://www.chevrolet.com/silverado/index.htm
Take a look at this link. The motor has 285 horse= around 235 on the rear wheel.
+ 10 or so for exhaust
+ 20 superchip
20"- tires= traction.
L= 335 on the rearwheel
I suspect you should beat him by atleast 4 car lengths. Just do a good burnout before the race- Then hammer him into the ground!
Take a look at this link. The motor has 285 horse= around 235 on the rear wheel.
+ 10 or so for exhaust
+ 20 superchip
20"- tires= traction.
L= 335 on the rearwheel
I suspect you should beat him by atleast 4 car lengths. Just do a good burnout before the race- Then hammer him into the ground!
Please!
'Sean:
Come on now! NO WAY will you get outrun by that thing. Not only will you pull him through any gear, any any speed, but you will DEFINITELY come out of the hole harder.
I'm pulling 2.0XX 60-foot times ALL DAY in bad air with my bone-stock 2000.
Practically nothing, and particularly that lightly-modified pickup, will run with you in a street setting. You will come to appreciate this as you get a few miles under you belt.
Whup on the boy, and do it quick, before somebody talks some sense into him.
Come on now! NO WAY will you get outrun by that thing. Not only will you pull him through any gear, any any speed, but you will DEFINITELY come out of the hole harder.
I'm pulling 2.0XX 60-foot times ALL DAY in bad air with my bone-stock 2000.
Practically nothing, and particularly that lightly-modified pickup, will run with you in a street setting. You will come to appreciate this as you get a few miles under you belt.
Whup on the boy, and do it quick, before somebody talks some sense into him.
Trending Topics
Thanks for your help guys, I kinda knew this but you know how sometimes people screw with your head. last night I left 3 burn outs outside his shop, all linked up so it looks like a lightning strike!!! i will post pics to night. thanks
Originally posted by svtsean
Thanks for your help guys, I kinda knew this but you know how sometimes people screw with your head. last night I left 3 burn outs outside his shop, all linked up so it looks like a lightning strike!!! i will post pics to night. thanks
Thanks for your help guys, I kinda knew this but you know how sometimes people screw with your head. last night I left 3 burn outs outside his shop, all linked up so it looks like a lightning strike!!! i will post pics to night. thanks
"285-50 at the Flywheel= 235
Headers 9
Exhaust 15
Airaid 15
Superchip 20
---------
294 "
I'm thought the 5.3 was rated at 270 as advertised. Plus all of the previous perfrmance parts are there maximum ratings and at flywheel definately not rearwheel, and in optimum conditions. Especially on a none blown engine, that is being very optimistic.
If he's lucky he's sitting at 270 rwhp and if it is 285 flywheel it still isn't anymore than 280.
Either way you'll smoke him
Headers 9
Exhaust 15
Airaid 15
Superchip 20
---------
294 "
I'm thought the 5.3 was rated at 270 as advertised. Plus all of the previous perfrmance parts are there maximum ratings and at flywheel definately not rearwheel, and in optimum conditions. Especially on a none blown engine, that is being very optimistic.
If he's lucky he's sitting at 270 rwhp and if it is 285 flywheel it still isn't anymore than 280.
Either way you'll smoke him
Hey Bolt owners, I'm on your side. I don't think the GM guy has a prayer.
The numbers I qouted are from various truck magazine's. I do not want to step on anyone's toes here, ok.
I have had nothing but bad luck from GM products. I am back with a new FORD, and plan on keeping it a very long time. I am very happy with it's overall performance/reliability/comfort.
Let us know what happens to your GM buddy...
We would love to read about a GM kill...
R1968
The numbers I qouted are from various truck magazine's. I do not want to step on anyone's toes here, ok.
I have had nothing but bad luck from GM products. I am back with a new FORD, and plan on keeping it a very long time. I am very happy with it's overall performance/reliability/comfort.
Let us know what happens to your GM buddy...
We would love to read about a GM kill...
R1968


