Lightning

Slower Than a 454 SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 1999 | 02:08 AM
  #16  
PFA's Avatar
PFA
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 0
From: Belleville, MI
Angry

Hey, I only got a best of 24.5k. A little faster, but NO Superchip!

------------------
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
PFA
'99 WHITE LIGHTNIN'
#0873
RHINO, Soft cover
LoJack
Valentine 1
Mobil 1
Best ET-14.18

 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 1999 | 03:15 AM
  #17  
4D THNDR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA USA
Thumbs up

4 runs...best was 1246, worst was 618...T1 @ work.

------------------
Red 99.5 Lightning,#0975,Born 5/6/99...Adopted 5/27/99 Chipped w/SuperChip Flipchip chip, Mobil 1

 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 1999 | 04:28 PM
  #18  
F150SVT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Post

Only time for one run:

41.3 Kbps

No chip yet but decent launch technique, plus iced down operater with a cold Bud.

Mike
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 1999 | 09:52 PM
  #19  
asdeman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Okc, OK
Post

Well a T1 is not the fastest means of internet communications. I work for the FAA
and we upgrade from T1 to T4. Now I can download a 30 MB file in a matter of seconds.
The transfer rate for average T1 is 1.544 MB
and T4 is 5.23 MB a second. I have a cable modem at home but do most of my downloads at work on the T4. I have to say I would never ever own a telephone modem. I'm on the computer and internet about 12 hrs a day and
could not put up with the delays.

Terry
99.5 Red "LOADED" Lighting
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 1999 | 12:25 AM
  #20  
blackbolt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: willow grove, pa, usa
Post

have cable modem at house....ran several tests and worst was 95.1 Kbps,11.7 KBytes/sec
and the best was 1457.1 Kbps, 178.6KBytes/sec
will try this this test during off peak hours
also read in a mag somewhere that tests were done by some company and they found that T-1's were the fastest setups....

------------------
99.5 black lightning
no mods yet
lots of stares and looks


 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 1999 | 12:26 AM
  #21  
blackbolt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: willow grove, pa, usa
Post

have cable modem at house....ran several tests and worst was 95.1 Kbps,11.7 KBytes/sec
and the best was 1457.1 Kbps, 178.6KBytes/sec
will try this this test during off peak hours
also read in a mag somewhere that tests were done by some company and they found that T-1's were the fastest setups....

------------------
99.5 black lightning
no mods yet
lots of stares and looks


 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 1999 | 12:50 AM
  #22  
gp's Avatar
gp
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: sanford n.c. u.s.a.
Post

my downloading time seems to be as fast as i need. i think my modem has more horse power than the rest of you.here we go again.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 1999 | 10:38 PM
  #23  
NXCobra's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Woodhaven, MI USA
Post

The thing that makes this site so slow is the banners from burst.net (the clickable ones at the top of the screen). I combatted this by using lynx (unix text browser) and have no problems at all. Loads very fast with my slow 26400 connection..

------------------
Jim
96 Black Cobra,
K&N,OffRoad H-Pipe
NitrousExpress 150 shot
Soon to have a stroked 351W
1999.5 Black Lightning
No Mods yet


 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 1999 | 03:37 AM
  #24  
Dennis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Post

Got ADSL here. Cable modems are not available in my area, but even if they were, I'm concerned about security and flooding, so I'd still go with ADSL.

I'm running at 768 Kbps. Sometimes, get to use a system on a wireless modem running at 2 megs. I really don't see much difference because of bottlenecks and slow servers all around the creation.

Even when on a dialup modem at 40Kbps max, never had to wait very long (at most 4 or 5 seconds for a page on this message board to load).

My guess is, some people are in high traffic areas and their service provider is probably out of bandwidth.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.