Lightning

I got a ride IN the PSP TURBO POWERED BIG BAD RED BEAST, !!WOO HOO!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 12:48 AM
  #31  
l-menace's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
Originally posted by HTown Trucker
Turbos > any thing else.

a turbo will ALWAYS give more torque then a roots blower. hell a roots blower you guys using at 16psi+ it actually sucks 75hp+ just to turn the thing where a turbo takes 5hp if that.

hell if a bone stock 4.2 V6 with a single turbo at 13psi makes 362rwhp and 490rwtq out of a V6 then please a v8 turbo will make massive amounts of torque.
I could care LESS about peak numbers!
The Roots makes Torque at low RPM's, period!

A turbo, you need to spool it up to make the torque. To launch, you need a manual, or a high stall to spool the turbo.

I'm not KNOCKING turbo, I LOVE the idea, but don't knock the roots/screw.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 12:56 AM
  #32  
Struck in AZ's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 6
From: Cave Creek, AZ
Originally posted by l-menace
I could care LESS about peak numbers!
The Roots makes Torque at low RPM's, period!

A turbo, you need to spool it up to make the torque. To launch, you need a manual, or a high stall to spool the turbo.

I'm not KNOCKING turbo, I LOVE the idea, but don't knock the roots/screw.
You and I need to stop meeting like this menace...
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 01:00 AM
  #33  
l-menace's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
yeah agreed!

I meant to say, I could care less about peak numbers, I am more concerned with the space UNDER the Dyno Curve.
The more space = the more power

I'd rather have a nice smooth power curve on the dyno graph, than one that looks like a Heart monitor with Peaks.

I'm talking about Turbo's IN GENERAL, NOT SAL'S TRUCK!
Now, Knowing Sal's tuning first hand I'm quite certain that his curve will be phenomenal!
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 01:32 AM
  #34  
Bad as L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: Auburn Wa
Both of you guys need to go for a ride in something thats set up right. A big turbo can drop like a Hammer ! With todays boost controls and turbine wheel designs its not like the old days.

When I had my GN the last turbo I had on it was 70mm on a 235 cube motor and a big flat tappet solid cam and I have never driven anything more responsive than that. But most guys wont go out and spend a good chunk of money on a computerized boost control either and that is one of the keys.....holding the wastegate closed until almost full boost is on line.

The boost lag that you guys are talking about....9 times out of 10 is an early opening wastegate. And if you have the right turbo you don't need ceramic ball bearings and all that. I know guys that have bought those turbos and will never waste the money again.
Dale
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #35  
LightningTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,438
Likes: 1
From: Palm Coast, FL
Originally posted by Bad as L
Both of you guys need to go for a ride in something thats set up right. A big turbo can drop like a Hammer ! With todays boost controls and turbine wheel designs its not like the old days.
Dale hit it on the head.

You guys shouldn't knock the abilities of the turbo, until you see the results. Remember when we all knocked a centrifugal blower on a Lightning? Then I made 700 rwtq with the Procharger and it amazed everyone, even myself. The turbo is just that much better, since it's not tied to engine rpms. Maybe the turbo will suck, maybe it will kick ***. Time will tell. But the initial results are amazing. I've been driving the Lightning back and forth to work and it's been real fun. With only 10 psi, at 1/4 throttle this thing pulls like a **** and blazes the tires at will.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #36  
easterisland's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #37  
tlfwatch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/ LIGHTNING FAST
SAL WHEN AM I GOING TO GET TO RIDE IN THE WORLDS BEST KNOWN L IGHTNING ???

Originally posted by LightningTuner
Dale hit it on the head.

You guys shouldn't knock the abilities of the turbo, until you see the results. Remember when we all knocked a centrifugal blower on a Lightning? Then I made 700 rwtq with the Procharger and it amazed everyone, even myself. The turbo is just that much better, since it's not tied to engine rpms. Maybe the turbo will suck, maybe it will kick ***. Time will tell. But the initial results are amazing. I've been driving the Lightning back and forth to work and it's been real fun. With only 10 psi, at 1/4 throttle this thing pulls like a **** and blazes the tires at will.
SAL when am i going to get to ride in the red machine
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #38  
LightningTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,438
Likes: 1
From: Palm Coast, FL
Re: SAL WHEN AM I GOING TO GET TO RIDE IN THE WORLDS BEST KNOWN L IGHTNING ???

Originally posted by tlfwatch
SAL when am i going to get to ride in the red machine
Come on down .
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #39  
l-menace's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
hmmm... buy a ticket, fly out to NY, rental to Port Jefferson, Ride in the baddest L on the planet?

PRICELESS
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #40  
9 Second Gen 1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, NJ.
It sounds like you really Got that Truck Dialed In Sal. I'm sure it will be a Terror. I can't Wait to see it Run down the Track. Good Luck Pal.

Ralph Voorhees
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #41  
Struck in AZ's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 6
From: Cave Creek, AZ
Originally posted by Bad as L
Both of you guys need to go for a ride in something thats set up right.
I appreciate it but I've been in 10 second GN's, a 1000hp Supra and a twin turbo 911 that put down nearly 700hp. I'm pretty sure I know about fast turbo cars. With that said my argument was a turbo isn't going to have the near instant low-end torque of a Roots or twin screw. Hell, even MM&FF got it right and showed that a twin turbo setup on a 4.6L showed less bottom end than a twin screw supercharger. Granted, the turbos 'caught' the twin screw at about 3,500rpm and took off from there but the supercharger did indeed have much more bottom end.

So, as I originally stated, let's see what kind of low-end torque is being produced by these turbo setups. I'm guessing that the peak torque is shifted significantly higher in the rev range. Still waiting for someone to prove me wrong.

LightningTuner
Then I made 700 rwtq with the Procharger and it amazed everyone, even myself. The turbo is just that much better, since it's not tied to engine rpms.
Where did that 700 ft.-lbs. happen? 4,500...5,000rpm?
 

Last edited by Struck in AZ; Mar 25, 2005 at 09:43 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #42  
svtguy12's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Struck in AZ
I appreciate it but I've been in 10 second GN's, a 1000hp Supra and a twin turbo 911 that put down nearly 700hp. I'm pretty sure I know about fast turbo cars. With that said my argument was a turbo isn't going to have the near instant low-end torque of a Roots or twin screw. Hell, even MM&FF got it right and showed that a twin turbo setup on a 4.6L showed less bottom end than a twin screw supercharger. Granted, the turbos 'caught' the twin screw at about 3,500rpm and took off from there but the supercharger did indeed have much more bottom end.

So, as I originally stated, let's see what kind of low-end torque is being produced by these turbo setups. I'm guessing that the peak torque is shifted significantly higher in the rev range. Still waiting for someone to prove me wrong.
If I owned a turbo L then I would use a 200 shot to get it off the line and then just phase it out around 3500rpm, then you've got no problems.



Just my .02 cents,
Tony
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 09:50 PM
  #43  
Bad as L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: Auburn Wa
What I expect to happen with mine is that I will have to time limit the boost for a second or two to keep the tires from exploding.
And then bring in the boost as traction will allow. If you watch an 8 second mustang with a 10 wide tire.....thats the only way they can get down the track. I believe the converter that I have new will more than enough to get the job done.

A turbo gives you this option....a blower doesn't.
Dale
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 11:51 PM
  #44  
03LightninRocks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 0
From: Botswana
Originally posted by Crash!
Rocks-

The intent of my post was to provide more data. The system will sell itself, especially once the numbers hit the site. Just posting my experience, and some data collected at the dyno.

Quite honestly...if I start seeing guys getting these things into the nines with turbo chargers, I will be one of the first lining up for one. Right now I am just waiting for the guys with endless resources to get all the bugs worked out. I can see the potential is there.


Rocks
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.