Bbk Twin Blade T/b
Originally posted by LTNBOLT
Here are the numbers you are talking about from SVT Performance. It would be nice to see the actual dyno sheet to see the spread across the RPM range.
Stock plenum....accufab 456.4rwhp/ 551lbtq
CL upper.....accufab 468.9rwhp/ 565lbtqTq
stock plenum....BBK 459.2 rwhp/ 549 lbtq
CL Upper.....BBK 474.4/562.3 lbtq
The biggest benefit of a single blade is the throttle response increase during daily driving. At say an 1/8th throttle the single blade lets more air into the intake than twin blades. This means less pedal to cruise at 80 mph also.
I'm glad you like your BBK TB but people that install TB's looking to big HP increases are barking up the wrong tree.
Here are the numbers you are talking about from SVT Performance. It would be nice to see the actual dyno sheet to see the spread across the RPM range.
Stock plenum....accufab 456.4rwhp/ 551lbtq
CL upper.....accufab 468.9rwhp/ 565lbtqTq
stock plenum....BBK 459.2 rwhp/ 549 lbtq
CL Upper.....BBK 474.4/562.3 lbtq
The biggest benefit of a single blade is the throttle response increase during daily driving. At say an 1/8th throttle the single blade lets more air into the intake than twin blades. This means less pedal to cruise at 80 mph also.
I'm glad you like your BBK TB but people that install TB's looking to big HP increases are barking up the wrong tree.
If you're so concerned with the entire powerband, I'll bet the stock TB makes better power and torque from idle all the way to 3500 RPM. Is that the better way to go? I doubt it. However, if given the choice between a TB that acts more like a stocker (BBK) regarding idle characteristics and not hanging up as the Accufab (frequently) does (did a search a while back and found this to be the case), plus beats it out in a HP comparison on a truck that is already modded enough to make >450 RWHP, I believe that makes it a much better choice. Not only that, it costs less than the Accufab. I had two Accufab's, and the throttle blade in the closed position was further away from one side of the housing than the other (both Accfabs were like this), and I even tried several TPS adjustments in tandem with backing out the set screw to bring the idle down. Still idled around 850 RPM no matter what, and still hung up around 1300 RPM for a few seconds after taking your foot off the gas (no matter what).
I have been involved in racing and working on many different vehicles, including my own supercharged Mustangs, so I am not a beginner when it comes to adjusting things. So, I am convinced that I got unlucky with the two (2) Accufab pieces, or they are just inconsistent. The first BBK piece worked like a charm.
So, being a better working, higher HP an less expensive piece, that's why (for me) I felt it was a no-brainer. I know there are others on here who like their Accufabs.
Originally posted by Blown347Hatch
. . . So, being a better working, higher HP an less expensive piece, that's why (for me) I felt it was a no-brainer. . .
. . . So, being a better working, higher HP an less expensive piece, that's why (for me) I felt it was a no-brainer. . .


