Whipple 2.3 Dyno results
Originally posted by WaveBlaster785
Whipple is a better made product regardless, so if it's the same money or less, then why would you even consider the KB, even if the HP numbers were only comparable.
Whipple is a better made product regardless, so if it's the same money or less, then why would you even consider the KB, even if the HP numbers were only comparable.
Originally posted by lokosvt
Stock tune, I think its a good sc, but I was expecting better results for the price and for what everyone was talking about.
Stock tune, I think its a good sc, but I was expecting better results for the price and for what everyone was talking about.
This is the 2.3
Not the 3.3 race blower that everyone has been hyping.
This is the direct competition for the KB. With that said, retail is supposed to be about 3200....it's that right on par with KB??
Originally posted by lokosvt
MM&FF June 2002 issue, KB testing everything stock 3" upper 7.5 stock lower 13psi, It made 403rwhp. With the 9" lower and 2.75 upper, accufab tb, 20.6psi, 511 rwhp. With the 2.57 upper accufab, 21.6psi , 522rwhp 600lbs-ft tq. This was back then, Im sure theres have been some changes to the KB since then. Im not so impressed with the Whipple.
MM&FF June 2002 issue, KB testing everything stock 3" upper 7.5 stock lower 13psi, It made 403rwhp. With the 9" lower and 2.75 upper, accufab tb, 20.6psi, 511 rwhp. With the 2.57 upper accufab, 21.6psi , 522rwhp 600lbs-ft tq. This was back then, Im sure theres have been some changes to the KB since then. Im not so impressed with the Whipple.
Wow, those things will sell great. I have to say its nice to see vendors putting this much R&D into the lightning even though its been discontinued. I guess they know where the money is at though. I really hope they have a few of them left when I get back in a year.
31C
31C
Originally posted by Rob_02Lightning
WOO HOO, Smooooooooking results
AND a real looker too
(not you Spanky, the Whipple)
WOO HOO, Smooooooooking results
AND a real looker too
(not you Spanky, the Whipple)
My Red-Rocket:
Originally the 2300ax unit was going to come with a 90mm round throttle body. But to keep cost down the unit will not come with a throttle body. The intake plenum is being reworked to accept the lightning throttle body. so in essence you would use a accufab or billetflow or equalivelent single blade if you so choose.
lokosvt
To my understanding the MM&FF KB test was done with a reflash done on the computer (basically a tune) and race fuel was used. The whipple test was done with NO changes besides the Whipple 2300AX unit as pictured. Stock PCM tune, Stock airbox etc. Please correct me if i am wrong.
The 3300AX unit development has stopped. It has been halted for 3 weeks now. Only reason being other projects being brought to the market. Including: Cobra 3.3, Lightning 2.3 and 3.3, 05' Mustang, 5.4 3V, 5.4 2V, 6.8 3V and some GM applications. So you can see they are swamped. Also the 3.3 unit has a long way to go. The adapter plate will be rediesgned so the unit does sit lower. Also JDM is making a upper plenum for the unit to help whipple out. Whipple still wants a rear entry unit and once the other project die down they will be making a rear entry plenum for the 3.3
Will
Originally the 2300ax unit was going to come with a 90mm round throttle body. But to keep cost down the unit will not come with a throttle body. The intake plenum is being reworked to accept the lightning throttle body. so in essence you would use a accufab or billetflow or equalivelent single blade if you so choose.
lokosvt
To my understanding the MM&FF KB test was done with a reflash done on the computer (basically a tune) and race fuel was used. The whipple test was done with NO changes besides the Whipple 2300AX unit as pictured. Stock PCM tune, Stock airbox etc. Please correct me if i am wrong.
The 3300AX unit development has stopped. It has been halted for 3 weeks now. Only reason being other projects being brought to the market. Including: Cobra 3.3, Lightning 2.3 and 3.3, 05' Mustang, 5.4 3V, 5.4 2V, 6.8 3V and some GM applications. So you can see they are swamped. Also the 3.3 unit has a long way to go. The adapter plate will be rediesgned so the unit does sit lower. Also JDM is making a upper plenum for the unit to help whipple out. Whipple still wants a rear entry unit and once the other project die down they will be making a rear entry plenum for the 3.3
Will
I'm glad to read that the R&D is going well, I'm also happy to here that the new inlet will accept the oval throttle body, after dropping near 500.00 on an Accufab it would be nice to see it help out. I know I'm not the only one waiting with checkbook in hand.
TA
TA
Originally posted by Casey02L
Just proves what some of us have been saying about not needing a tune to run more boost..........
Just proves what some of us have been saying about not needing a tune to run more boost..........
That much boost does need a tune. The stock eec cannot correct to the degree (%) that is needed. Anyone who runs a KB or Whipple with 20lbs of boost and no tune is crazy.
Steve
Last edited by Calightnin; Dec 25, 2004 at 11:25 PM.
I need this broke down into simpler terms.
The big difference here is that the KB and Whipple are screw compressor's that can make more boost with less heat at lower RPM. Correct?
Is that because in addition to the above mentioned difference the compressor has more volume?
Thanks. Sorry I am so slow and drive a stock L
The big difference here is that the KB and Whipple are screw compressor's that can make more boost with less heat at lower RPM. Correct?
Is that because in addition to the above mentioned difference the compressor has more volume?
Thanks. Sorry I am so slow and drive a stock L


