BOP reflash dyno graphs
I do not mean to offend anyone but I need some clarification.
The way I see it is this (allow me an analogy if you will):
I have a computer (PCM)
I run a program on the computer from the CD Rom drive on the face of the computer (same as chip)
I load a program from an external USB Hard drive (Micro tuner or Predator)
I run a program from an internal Hard drive. (PCM memory)
How would the same program run differently using different media?
Once it is loaded into memory it is the same correct?
I see reflash as a simple way of reloading the internal program instead of attatching a chip which gives Ford a reason to look further.
Doesn't a Micro tuner or Predator device do the same as a reflash?
Loading a program from various devices does not change how the computer actually operates does it? The computer still monitors the same sensors it did before but now it is using a different set of datapoints from the new program.
I do not think it matters how you get the program into the computer, the only thing that matters is the program itself.
You could take Nates program and put it on a chip and you would get the same results, good or bad.
I could be talking out my *** and I am sure some of you will tell me so but all this petty arguing over something so simple really brings the level of this forum down.
My apologies for not minding my own business.
The way I see it is this (allow me an analogy if you will):
I have a computer (PCM)
I run a program on the computer from the CD Rom drive on the face of the computer (same as chip)
I load a program from an external USB Hard drive (Micro tuner or Predator)
I run a program from an internal Hard drive. (PCM memory)
How would the same program run differently using different media?
Once it is loaded into memory it is the same correct?
I see reflash as a simple way of reloading the internal program instead of attatching a chip which gives Ford a reason to look further.
Doesn't a Micro tuner or Predator device do the same as a reflash?
Loading a program from various devices does not change how the computer actually operates does it? The computer still monitors the same sensors it did before but now it is using a different set of datapoints from the new program.
I do not think it matters how you get the program into the computer, the only thing that matters is the program itself.
You could take Nates program and put it on a chip and you would get the same results, good or bad.
I could be talking out my *** and I am sure some of you will tell me so but all this petty arguing over something so simple really brings the level of this forum down.
My apologies for not minding my own business.
Originally posted by Norm
You could take Nates program and put it on a chip and you would get the same results, good or bad.
You could take Nates program and put it on a chip and you would get the same results, good or bad.
Jim
Originally posted by Crazyone
Nate Ive run n2o on a TON of stangs with no chip my friend, its nothing special. Thus far I havent blown up a car in 8 years
Brandon
Nate Ive run n2o on a TON of stangs with no chip my friend, its nothing special. Thus far I havent blown up a car in 8 years
Brandon
I ran a turbo setup on my '92 mustang, also with no chip. Just larger injectors and a mass air calibrated for them. That's a different ballgame.
To follow your line of reasoning would mean we should be able put a 4lb pulley and 100 shot on a stock calibration pcm truck with no problems. I wouldn't try that.
You are comparing apples to oranges.
Jim
lets be honest here, the program he is running is nothing special,
buzz, like you said and like i predicted, the program is fat to protect for the nitrous, just as i said it would be,
my question, that i've asked dozens of times now, is where is the dyno graph of the "fixed" problem that caused the lean condition.
it was replied the problem was fixed and it was witnessed that the a/f ratios' were identical with and without the nitrous, so, why weren't those dyno graphs posted from the beginning? why haven't they still been posted?
?
?
?
buzz, like you said and like i predicted, the program is fat to protect for the nitrous, just as i said it would be,
my question, that i've asked dozens of times now, is where is the dyno graph of the "fixed" problem that caused the lean condition.
it was replied the problem was fixed and it was witnessed that the a/f ratios' were identical with and without the nitrous, so, why weren't those dyno graphs posted from the beginning? why haven't they still been posted?
?
?
?
Originally posted by jmimac351
Norm, you cannot access the same points being accessed with the reflash. The guy doing this is getting to areas these tuners cannot get to. They are not the same.
Jim
Norm, you cannot access the same points being accessed with the reflash. The guy doing this is getting to areas these tuners cannot get to. They are not the same.
Jim
Originally posted by Mike Wesley
If you were to take the file that BOP is loading onto your PCM, put it into a Predator, Diablo Chip, Superchips chip, AutoLogic chip, homemade chip, Tweecr, EEC-Tuner.. they would all work and perform identically.
Hopefully that helps clear up some of the confusion. If not, maybe I can re-word it.
Mike Wesley - AutoLogic
If you were to take the file that BOP is loading onto your PCM, put it into a Predator, Diablo Chip, Superchips chip, AutoLogic chip, homemade chip, Tweecr, EEC-Tuner.. they would all work and perform identically.
Hopefully that helps clear up some of the confusion. If not, maybe I can re-word it.
Mike Wesley - AutoLogic
Originally posted by Norm
Not according to Mike Wesley. Doesn't he know what he is talking about? I thought he programs these things for a living.
Not according to Mike Wesley. Doesn't he know what he is talking about? I thought he programs these things for a living.
This is the major leagues vs. the minor leagues. That is not an overstatement.
There are a lot of opinions here so you'll just have to sort through it and do what you think is best. BTW, Nate is not the first person to have this done. He just shared his results more publicly. There are a lot of guys running this right now that don't really care whether or not anyone else thinks it's better.
Jim
Originally posted by jmimac351
There are a lot of opinions here so you'll just have to sort through it and do what you think is best. BTW, Nate is not the first person to have this done. He just shared his results more publicly. There are a lot of guys running this right now that don't really care whether or not anyone else thinks it's better.
Jim
There are a lot of opinions here so you'll just have to sort through it and do what you think is best. BTW, Nate is not the first person to have this done. He just shared his results more publicly. There are a lot of guys running this right now that don't really care whether or not anyone else thinks it's better.
Jim
I just can't grasp the difference between all the various methods of loading a program. It seems that the cheapest way would be the best way if they can all do the same thing.
I thought the argument about different banks was shot down a long time ago. I think it was way back when Diablo first came out. My memory may be cloudy on that one though.
Thanks.


