2012 F150 V6 with EcoBoost or 2012 F150 V8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
PurdueF150's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
2012 F150 V6 with EcoBoost or 2012 F150 V8?

Looking to buy a new truck and am wanting some feedback on whether the new Ecoboost engines are worth the downgrade from the V8 to the V6. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
ddellwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,823
Likes: 15
From: Houston, TX
If I were buying a truck today, I'd almost certainly opt for the V8 -- in my mind, the Ecoboost has no proven track record of reliability that would make me feel comfortable going with that engine. Of course, I tend keep my vehicles until they are driven into the ground, so long term reliability is probably more important to me than it is to your average bear. Five years from now my advice might be different, but as of right now, I've stated my peace......
 

Last edited by ddellwo; Dec 26, 2012 at 06:04 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
dewalt17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Sparta, IL
I pretty much feel the same about ecoboost right now. Some of the issues people have been having and Ford not fixing them makes me not want one.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:54 PM
  #4  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Check the V6 and 09-13 sections and read for hour or days. You will find lots of opinions and little facts but some of it is entertaining.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 07:38 PM
  #5  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
If I were buying one, I would go with the 5.0 V8, especially since I usually keep my daily drivers for years.

If I did buy the ecoboost, I would go ahead and purchase 2 turbos and put them up for when they are needed (I have read they were designed to last 150,000 miles).
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #6  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by Frank S
If I were buying one, I would go with the 5.0 V8, especially since I usually keep my daily drivers for years.

If I did buy the ecoboost, I would go ahead and purchase 2 turbos and put them up for when they are needed (I have read they were designed to last 150,000 miles).
See this is exactly what I was talking about. The engine was tested for a 150,000 mile life cycle for warranty reasons not that it will fall apart at 150,001. This is 50,000 miles more than most gas engines are rated for. The 5.4 was tested for 100,000 miles and there are tons of examples on here where they have lasted 2 and 3 times this. If for some reason a turbo was to go out the rebuild kit is around $100.

Also, the 5.0 is one model year newer than the EB. It was first used in the 2010 Mustang, the 3.5 EB started life in the 2009 SHO and MKS.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 08:08 PM
  #7  
AirsoftF150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Ma
Hey I love the 5.0 in my truck it is powerful, efficient and sounds great with an exhaust. I never considered having the ecoboost because I don't really do anything where having the turbo'd v6 would have made sense for me. I drive like a gramp and get over 20 on the highway in a 4X4 S'Crew and average 18/19 mixed driving.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 26, 2012 | 09:09 PM
  #8  
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Wookie
Also, the 5.0 is one model year newer than the EB. It was first used in the 2010 Mustang, the 3.5 EB started life in the 2009 SHO and MKS.
Yeah, this is what I was thinking. They are both reletively new engines. I think that either would be as reliable as the other. I think that it depends what your doing with your truck. If you need lots of torque go with the twin turbo V6. Want a sweet sounding, high revving V8, get the 5.0.

My truck with the "new" base 3.7 V6 has been fine for what I use it for. No problems here.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 09:33 PM
  #9  
dewalt17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Sparta, IL
The coyote has been out for a bit on Ford racing. It is basically a much better, revised version of triton 4.6/5.4 from what I understand.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 09:48 PM
  #10  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by dewalt17
The coyote has been out for a bit on Ford racing. It is basically a much better, revised version of triton 4.6/5.4 from what I understand.
That was the original plan, but things changed. Now about the only things that are the same between the 4.6 and 5.0 are the deck height, bore spacing and bell housing bolt pattern. This was done to keep the tooling in the factory and vehicles the same. The block, heads, intake, bore, stroke and firing order are all different from the 4.6/5.4. It puts out great numbers for its size and sounds really good too.

The EB is based on the Duratec series that Ford has been building for ages. They took the basic design and reworked the bottom end for the new power levels. The heads were reworked for the variable cams and forced induction. The low end grunt of this motor is what sold me after several test drives of both the EB and 5.0.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #11  
Ross-FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 1
From: BC, Canada
Probably buy the 5 point ohhhhh as you can bolt a blower on it.

The EB style / type of engine has been in Europe for years and is an excellent set up.

Shame they don't offer the 6.2 in all models, configs.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 11:28 PM
  #12  
Raptor05121's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,610
Likes: 7
From: Live Oak, FL
Originally Posted by ddellwo
If I were buying a truck today, I'd almost certainly opt for the V8 -- in my mind, the Ecoboost has no proven track record of reliability that would make me feel comfortable going with that engine. Of course, I tend keep my vehicles until they are driven into the ground, so long term reliability is probably more important to me than it is to your average bear. Five years from now my advice might be different, but as of right now, I've stated my peace......
What are you smoking??? The EcoBoost has been out for YEARS. Easily TWICE as long as the 5.0L and has sold more units than the 5.0L, 6.2L, and 3.7L COMBINED.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 11:35 PM
  #13  
dewalt17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Sparta, IL
When did the first ecoboost come out?
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 01:54 AM
  #14  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
The 3.5L was first sold in 2009 in the SHO and MKS. See post #6.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 11:33 AM
  #15  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by Raptor05121
What are you smoking??? The EcoBoost has been out for YEARS. Easily TWICE as long as the 5.0L and has sold more units than the 5.0L, 6.2L, and 3.7L COMBINED.
But the problem is, from an engineering standpoint, an engine is stressed in a much different way when installed in a truck that tows and hauls thousands of pounds. An engine that will last 200,000 miles in a passenger car will not necessarily last as long in a pickup truck.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.