Obummer needs to go

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:14 AM
_Flea_'s Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most liberals don't seem to have a very good grasp on economics, and they also seem to not understand or simply don't know history.

At what point are we allowed to blame Obama for the things goin' wrong in this country, instead of Bush? I mean, the guy has been in office for a couple years now...

It's also kinda funny that many liberals forget the record market highs during the Bush administration. They also forget that war is expensive (whether you agree with the wars is irrelevant).

I'm really gettin' a good laugh outta some of the comments made in this thread. That sad part is that so many people feel the same way K-Mac does. Some will never get it. Others will eventually come around.

The Democrats don't have a clue, and it seems a lot of Republicans don't have a clue either. The Republicans seem to have forgotten what they are supposed to stand for. Hopefully the Tea Party movement has changed that, but only time will tell. As long as this country only elects people from the two big parties, we'll continue a downward spiral. We need more constitutionalists in elected positions. Not politicians who follow a party agenda.
 
  #47  
Old 12-13-2010, 12:33 PM
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
...<snip>...
Maybe I am blind but I don't see how continuing a tax policy that drove us to the worst recession since the Great Depression is going to fix things. The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
You really think that is what did it ?

Nothing to do with the housing market value dropping and all the 125% mortgages from the late 90s coming to roost ( along with a few other things ).

Yes you have it all figured out ( just like calling the current POTUS more of a republican than Nixon).
Go forth and inform the the unknowing ( could be considered a circular definition.. )

I really love the last line of that post
 
  #48  
Old 12-13-2010, 12:44 PM
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Starkville Mississippi
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, what about the housing bubble that burst? What was its origin?
How about the ongoing growth of government and all of the bailouts? This surely isnt conservative. Liberal ideals think that this is how a country economically runs. They refuse to look at what has and hasn't worked in history.

All I can say is that the Tea Party better get stronger, kick out the Republicans who aren't conservative, and start controlling government spending. It's ridiculous that 32% of my salary is poof! Gone, all to the government. Fiscal responsibility needs to be painted all over this country with an extra-wide brush, and the tea party is the only group that understands that.
 
  #49  
Old 12-13-2010, 01:09 PM
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Green_98
Yea, what about the housing bubble that burst? What was its origin? ....<snip>...
Yes who's idea was that..........
Something about a chicken in every pot, and a house for every pot.... Home ownership was a right, not privilege.
I think he worked with the guy that invented the Internet...

Republicans take the blame for it, due to the big wall street companies that took a hit and the "stress tests" that the rules of which were not told to them.
Nice test, you are going to have a 10 question pass or fail test tomorrow. Sorry I cannot tell you what it is on, or if I am taking the correct answers from text books or wiki or a not well known blogger's site, but you had better get all 10 questions right, or you fail and must take a loan at an interest rate that is to be determined ( has nothing to do with Prime or fed funds rates ).

I still think that there was a bond payment due, and they got BoA to pony up the $2 B they paid in interest to the feds a "street tax" to make the payment. Nice savings account the administration has going here.

Originally Posted by Green_98
....<snip>...
How about the ongoing growth of government and all of the bailouts? This surely isnt conservative. Liberal ideals think that this is how a country economically runs. They refuse to look at what has and hasn't worked in history. ....<snip>...
Sure it is, didn't you hear wall street is reporting record profits, which means record taxes due. This is why raising taxes is a great idea. All that cash coming in makes it fiscally conservative.

Fortune 500 rank: 2
2009 profit: $19.3 billion
The global recession cost Exxon bragging rights: It's no longer America's largest company ( that title now goes to Wal-Mart) and it isn't posting record profits. Indeed, earnings got cut in half as sales dropped by more than a third in 2009.
 
  #50  
Old 12-13-2010, 07:35 PM
wittom's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Western Massachusetts
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
Is making sure there are a few safety nets in our society Socialist? Social Security, Medicare, health insurance, education, unemployment insurance, disability...I mean seriously? These are things of good and will better us overall.
It's becoming one awfully big safety net:

Originally Posted by Boston Globe-A legacy of unintended side effects
And once a family gets on SSI, it can be very hard to let go. The attraction of up to $700 a month in payments, and the near-automatic Medicaid coverage that comes with SSI approval, leads some families to count on a child’s remaining classified as disabled, even as his or her condition may be improving. It also leads many teenage beneficiaries to avoid steps — like taking a job — that might jeopardize the disability check.
Boston Globe-A legacy of unintended side effects

Read this article and then tell me these are things of good and will better us overall. This stuff isn't happening in a land far, far away. This article takes place in my state. They interviewed people in the area that I live. I see people like this every day. It's happening everwhere.
 
  #51  
Old 12-13-2010, 07:58 PM
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not saying that people never abuse these programs.

I seriously think giving a 4 year old SSI is stupid. They aren't replacing an income they would otherwise earn.

Some of these things have grown way out of control, but the fact that some abuse programs doesn't mean the programs should be stripped away.

I would rather give the 80 year old granny 800/month for SS than for her to be in a shelter eating cat food.

My dad died when I was 11. My mom and I were supposed to get SS checks. She got a couple and then got a letter saying she had to repay the benefits as she "made too much money" when she didn't make that much but oh well. No big deal. I got the dame letter after I turned 16 and worked PT. Again I would rather work than take the freebie.

I am not saying everyone has the same morals but I would rather give a few $$ to someone abusing it than to have legit ones suffer. You just never know when something might happen to you!
 
  #52  
Old 12-13-2010, 08:13 PM
_Flea_'s Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish the liberals would give away their own money, and let me keep my own. Then, I could choose to give my money to someone I feel is deservin', or I could save it just in case somethin' were to happen to me, or I could put it toward my own retirement since I'm likely not gonna be able to collect social security, or I could pump it back into the economy by purchasin' the things I want...etc...etc...etc....

I know what to do with my money better than the government or a liberal.
 
  #53  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:15 PM
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by _Flea_
I know what to do with my money better than the government or a liberal.
RACIST!!!! You only feel that way NOW because Obama is black! You LOVED it when that GW Bush spent your money, dincha?











j/k
 
  #54  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:20 PM
_Flea_'s Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LMAO!!!! I don't even like it when my wife spends our money. (Don't let her know I said that!) lol
 
  #55  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:38 PM
Djacobs28056's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
I seriously think giving a 4 year old SSI is stupid. They aren't replacing an income they would otherwise earn. ...

...You just never know when something might happen to you!
No, you are replacing the income their dead parent was earning. Like you said you never know what might happen to you. That's why you should be able to save. Not sent into a cycle of liberal spending in which you will never escape.



I would rather give the 80 year old granny 800/month for SS than for her to be in a shelter eating cat food.
So we should all pay because she wasn't a good steward of her money? My grandparents paid about 5% out of their pay where as I pay closer to 30%. They tax everything including wanting to go back to 50% when granny dies?
 
  #56  
Old 12-13-2010, 10:37 PM
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 1998
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
  #57  
Old 12-13-2010, 11:39 PM
06bluemeaniexl's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so much for the freedom to choose what you want to eat...
 
  #58  
Old 12-14-2010, 02:57 AM
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 06bluemeaniexl
so much for the freedom to choose what you want to eat...
I don't hear her saying that you will go to jail if you give your kids a Happy Meal at home.

She is trying to promote schools to offer better choices for lunch. What is wrong with that?

I remember my school's lunches in middle school and high school consisted of pizza so greasy that you could soak a dozen napkins with oil from it. To go along with that was some nice greasy fries and cans of pop.

This kind of stuff is cheap to produce and thus schools push it out. Most healthy Americans don't eat that kind of crap everyday!

It is like when I was in grade school, they slashed budgets and for about 3 years we didn't have PE.

Parents have no control over what their kids eat at school unless they brown bag it. Then they still can buy the junk.

I am no supporter of Obummer as I think he has proven himself to be no different that GW but this is hardly a reason to slam the guy.
 
  #59  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:06 AM
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1st4x4
No, you are replacing the income their dead parent was earning. Like you said you never know what might happen to you. That's why you should be able to save. Not sent into a cycle of liberal spending in which you will never escape.



So we should all pay because she wasn't a good steward of her money? My grandparents paid about 5% out of their pay where as I pay closer to 30%. They tax everything including wanting to go back to 50% when granny dies?
Do you honestly think most people really can save all that much? Most people are hand to mouth. I am not encouraging irresponsibility but the reality is that many people struggle to pay the mortgage and keep the utilities on. They had a study that people don't have enough for retirement. Aside from SS, the average person's savings would give them an income of about $190/month!



The tax rates today are the lowest in history in the US. Up until Reagan, the top tier was like 74%.

SS is a contract between generations. I am sure if you were a very astute investor people have proven they could possibly outperform SS's payouts but that is only if you make it to 65 or whatever the age is. If you get struck with a disabling problem early you or your family could be in big trouble.

As far as estate taxes, they don't kick in until you get into the millions. For most people it isn't an issue.

I will admit there is a part of me that thinks that those with big time assets should forgo their SS but they paid in so I guess they can take their share back.
 
  #60  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:11 AM
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by _Flea_
I wish the liberals would give away their own money, and let me keep my own. Then, I could choose to give my money to someone I feel is deservin', or I could save it just in case somethin' were to happen to me, or I could put it toward my own retirement since I'm likely not gonna be able to collect social security, or I could pump it back into the economy by purchasin' the things I want...etc...etc...etc....

I know what to do with my money better than the government or a liberal.

I wish I could keep my money too! I don't want to fund a bunch of unethical wars but that isn't my place to call it.

I would much rather see my tax dollars go to help people at home who are unemployed and can't find work than to rebuild Iraq. We build things there they really don't want and on top of that the insurgents blow it up anyway. That's a good use for my money!
 

Last edited by K-Mac Attack; 12-14-2010 at 03:25 AM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.